Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 29 September 2005 15:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly Need clarification on a scaffold question. We have a scaffold that is tied to the rear elevation of a 5 storey building. The only working platform is at the fifth storey of the building as rememdial works only need to be undertaken there. Access to this working platform is via the usual series of ladders in a zig zag formation with landing platform at each floor. My question is do landing platforms need to be treated in the same way in terms of toe boards, intermediate rail and guard rail at side elevation of the landing platform? Hope this makes sense. Jennifer
Admin  
#2 Posted : 29 September 2005 15:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope Yes, edge protection must prevent a gap greater than 470mm
Admin  
#3 Posted : 29 September 2005 18:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steven bentham Yes, good scaffolders will have already effectively guarded the intermidate platforms. Poor scaffolders will save on a couple of tubes and leave them off with the excuse that they are only required to guard working platforms.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 30 September 2005 02:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Antony McManus All scaffold platforms, the correct term is 'lift', require double guardrails, toeboards etc and must be inspected,and recorded, on a weekly basis and after severe weather or alteration. Hope this helps.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 30 September 2005 10:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler Under WAH ask them to provide RA either designer/scaffold company or builder. Regards Jonathan Sandler
Admin  
#6 Posted : 30 September 2005 16:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly So if everyone is agreed that all edges need to be protected why did the nice man at the HSE say that the situation I described was acceptable, not ideal but ok? Yours in puzzlement.... Jennifer
Admin  
#7 Posted : 30 September 2005 22:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Antony McManus the 'nice man' from the HSE probaly did not have the knowledge to assess the situation correctly. Contrary to many beliefs, scaffolding is an exact science. As a previous respondant stated, poor scaffolders will try and cut corners by saving a few tubes. This invariably happens with 'smaller' scaffolding companies. If you need any more advice Re: scaffolding, please contact me directly. FYI I've been an advanced scaffolder for 17+ years.. Regards Tony Mc
Admin  
#8 Posted : 01 October 2005 11:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lynchy Jennifer I would have thought that you would look at this as a place of work at height from which a person may be injured if they were to fall - per the WAH regs 2005. The fact that this is a temporary scaffold is incidental - access and egress is a place of work and measures have to be taken to prevent falls - ie guard rails!! And the guard rails then do indeed have to be of the correct standard - ie mid and top rail! Or is it the case that the person could not possibly get near the edge / get off the ladder?? Or have I got the wrong end of the stick here?? It is Saturday, after all!! Lynchy
Admin  
#9 Posted : 01 October 2005 11:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lynchy Jennifer The nice man at the HSE .............. (1)I bet you wouldn't be able to find him again if this case came to anything and, (2) the [reference removed] is not always right you know!!!!! (I'll propbably get arrested now!) Lynchy
Admin  
#10 Posted : 01 October 2005 16:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mev Jennifer I have always been led to believe that gaurdrails are required on landing platforms if a person can fall off not forgetting that a side could be up against a wall etc. but as for toeboards although best practice would be to put them on, but if the lift is only for ladder access and not a working lift i don't believe they are a requirement BS EN 12811-1 will give you the info you need, by the way don't be fooled by thinking only smaller companies cut corners as one post put it, scaffolders are contractors and erect the scaffold for whoever they are working for at the time be it large or small companies MEV
Admin  
#11 Posted : 01 October 2005 20:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Jennifer I am a 'nice man' from the HSE, but not the one you spoke with! From the way you've described it, I would say that you definately need appropriate edge protection, including toe-boards and guardrails. The WAH regs are essentially building on previous existing best practice, and the comments of others are correct - although it's a bit difficult to say without actually seeing what you have! Not sure who you spoke too? Most HSE offices have a specific Construction team that should be able to advise you appropriately - so maybe try them if you haven't already. I won't come and arrest you! Steve.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 02 October 2005 00:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john houlihan the top rail must be of a minimum height of 950mm, with the mid rail not leaving a gap of more than 470mm, and yes a toeboard plus stopend toeboards would be required.....dont let anyone tell you different.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 02 October 2005 18:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smurfer mustn't get into the habit of thinking toeboards are just for stopping equipment falling off the platform. You could be walking along a platform, slip on wet boards, feet slide to edge and as this happens you fall on your back and keep sliding under the lower handrail and off into oblivion... a toeboard would stop you!
Admin  
#14 Posted : 03 October 2005 18:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john houlihan quite right smurfer!! A double guard rail would be insufficient for the reason you outlined. If Jennifer would like any technical information about scaffolding I will kindly oblige.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 10 October 2005 22:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan james Sorry to correct you John but the top rail rail should be at 910 mm so maybe your knowlegde would also fit onto a postage stamp!!
Admin  
#16 Posted : 11 October 2005 09:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Barthrope Really Alan, Get with the programme. How long have the WAH Regs been out now?
Admin  
#17 Posted : 11 October 2005 17:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john houlihan message for alan who itermated my knowledge of scaffolding would fit on a postage stamp, well im sorry to disappoint you Alan but after 26 years in the scaffolding industry and now a health & safety consultant for the scaffold world my knowledge is pretty extensive coupled with first hand experience. when you have wiped the egg off your face take time to read the work at height regs, tg20/05, BS 5973 and BS EN 128-11 and sg4/05. When you have digested all that then come back to me and talk about scaffolding, then we may be able to get onto some more complex issues with scaffolding like topograhy, design etc,etc. Any problems you need clarifying you could contact me or the NASC.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.