Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 October 2005 22:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob Malcolm Can anyone tell me if it is acceptable to format a generic H&S file/plan by a principle contractor/planning supervisor so that it can be left on site at all times for the client to see if asked. Please take into consideration that the tasks performed by the principle contractor are identical every time & for the same contractor on each occasion. The only thing that changes is the site address along with a few localized environmental issues i.e. the task is conducted in close proximity to a school, river, highway etc. Many thanks Rob
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 October 2005 22:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob Malcolm Just noticed, I meant to say that the tasks are performed for the same client on every occasion.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 05 October 2005 00:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Butler Hi Rob As in CDM Reg15(4) - a H&S Plan should be prepared for each project. If we do the generic outline and build on each plan at each site then we have done what can be considered reasonable - my argument anyway. Those 'generic' H&S plans on project sites must be developed with relevant info such as project timescale, site specific risk issues, environmental factors, welfare arrrangments, etc (H&S File would not be on-site but passed over at handover phase). Sub Contract workforce changes from phase to phase too as do welfare provisions. Preperation of H&S Plans for CDM is rather difficult to apply to this sector without significant time/effort/manpower. How many other utilities organisations hold a relevant/dated and comprehensive H&S Plan on any site????? Regards, Steve B
Admin  
#4 Posted : 05 October 2005 07:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob Malcolm Hi Steve, Late night last night I see. Thanks for the input. I was beginning to loose my way with this one, I'm not up to speed enough with CDM Regs yet. Can we chat at length sometime soon if you have 5? Thanks Rob.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 05 October 2005 09:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Rob Just to keep correcting the problem first - It is princiPAL contractor. The problem I often find is that many Planning Supervisors seem unable to cope with a basic precedent plan which has the relevant areas modified for the particular site. Steve has identified these areas and I believe that they can be readily dealt with in the context of an aspect and impact assessment for each area. The information on site specific controls would then be strengthened in the method statements. If you are your own PS this problem disappears. The H&S file is I believe always one for the PS to produce. If you are the PS then the information can be constructed in such a way as to be simply appended with any local variation and supplied. If you are not the PS and have not been specifically contracted to produce the H&S file pass the information to the PS and let her/him worry about how to construct and distribute it. The current regulations do not place any duty on the PC to create the file this has to be done via a contract clause. Bob
Admin  
#6 Posted : 06 October 2005 13:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter I've never been keen on the generic approach. I'm gathering from postings that this is PU work on highways & footpaths? You seem to be making light of the local environment/existing site conditions. Traffic volumes, road widths, roundabouts, bus stops,fixed traffic lights, surrounding land and building use etc etc. are all highly significant project specific issues, and the way in which they are dealt with will vary greatly from project to project - hardly a generic approach. In a more general respect, "formatting" of a methodology can lead to a stagnation in approach to developing safer systems of work, with little or no consideration of possible improvements, adoption of new technologies etc. You would have to be confident that a frequent review process would work objectively.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 07 October 2005 13:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mal Shiels Hi all, thought it might be useful for me to add my bit in here, i act as planning supervisor on many projects and work closely with many principal contractors. We have a standard format and layout for the pre construction health and safety plans. About 35% of the plan is generic from project to project with the rest consisting of site and project specific information. I comment on many principal contractors construction phase health and safety plans, there is no problem with a generic layout or format with some generic information in there (contractors committment to h&s for example). However the major part of this plan should be site and project specific. It is important to actually embrace the ethos of what CDM is about, this is, not mountains of paperwork, it is working together, for smaller projects the plan will probably be a few pages, with the plan likely to grow with the more complex projects. With regard to the health and safty file, any planning supervisor worth their salt introduces this topic at pre start meetings and gets agreement on who will do what. Rob, if you want you can e-mail me and we can chat, even if its only to bounce ideas around, regards
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.