Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 07 October 2005 10:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By NLR
I have been asked by a contractor to supply a method statement for the above, the only risks I can think of are WRULD's or and cut fingers from cutting the tops of the tubes of mastic. Anyone got any other ideas. thanks in anticipation.
Nigel
Admin  
#2 Posted : 07 October 2005 10:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister
Have you thought about the hazards of the contents? I know some have ammonia, others will have various organic solvents, probably in small quantities though. Potential exposures to eyes, skin, ingestion and inhalation.

Also these can be used in awkward areas: work at height, confined spaces???

Also disposal.

Hope these few thoughts help.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 07 October 2005 11:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By NLR
Thanks for your response David all other risks i.e. working at height, cOSHH have been adressed by their own specific method statement.
Nigel
Admin  
#4 Posted : 07 October 2005 13:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
Soemtimes you just have to follow the path of least resistance. Either you tell the contractor that this is daft, brings H&S into disrepute, etc, etc.; or else you bite the bullet & provide him with a 4 or 5 line method statement for use of the gun? (Load tube,cut tube end, apply trigger pressure to prime and apply product in accordance with mnfrs instructions/COSHH Assessment.Apply end cap/seal end when not in use.To release depress lever and withdraw plunger.Discard used tubes in accordance with site waste arrangements/COSHH assessment)?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 07 October 2005 18:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope
mastic guns should only be used by competent persons. If they need instruction or training on how to use a mastic gun safely they are either under 5 years old, or biologically incapable of becoming a competent person
Admin  
#6 Posted : 07 October 2005 19:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ross Hunter
I agree with the above. A method statement for something such as this is like taking a sledgehammer to a walnut. A simple risk assesment would suffice. If this guy or any of his people feel they are not competant to use such a simple hand tool then I suggest that they shouldn't even be on site. True, on occassions (not very often)contents of the gun may be hazardous. If that is the case a simple COSHH assessment for the material being used and the user informed of its recommendations for protection etc therein.

Anyway shouldnt the contractor have his owm RAs COSHH Assts etc if the work that he has been contracted to do is the business he is in. Documents such as these should be checked prior to taking on a contractor as part of your duties to identify his competency.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.