Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 October 2005 10:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Molly Good morning all I am interested to hear of any "Large" organisations who have banned the use of hands free mobile telephones by thier employees while driving on company business. I am conducting a quick straw poll, I would be grateful for any input Regards
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 October 2005 11:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Malcolm Hogarth I have taken great pains to advise the powers that be that the use of hands free mobile telephones should be discouraged but have been told that as it is not against the law that the company will not take the advice. I have made sure that it is in the health and safety policy though. When I was sent a Bluetooth to use I promptly sent it back and told them that I did not intend to use it especially when driving (leading by example and all that)
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 October 2005 11:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By richard james apps Against Company Policy
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 October 2005 11:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nikki The HSE has banned hands free for all personnel.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 October 2005 12:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alison WR Ofcom has banned their use. Passengers may use mobile phones, but drivers must drive with the phone off and pull over to take messages or make calls. We recognise that we will have to work hard to ensure compliance. Australian research suggests the hands-free device only lowers the risk of crashing from x5 to x4, and we felt that the sense of safety afforded by the hands-free probably resulted in more time on the phone, so an overall increase in risk. The problem is that concentrating on the auditory input closes off visual input. Alison
Admin  
#6 Posted : 20 October 2005 13:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Daniels The National Trust has had a policy in place for several months whereby staff are not permitted to use mobile phones of any type whilst driving on Trust business.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 20 October 2005 16:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jackw. Fairly large LA. Chief executive refused advice re not using hands free thus staff can use these whilst driving..
Admin  
#8 Posted : 21 October 2005 07:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Molly Many thanks to all who responded - my findings suggest that the banning of the use of mobile telephones in any form while driving on company business is becoming an agenda item in many board rooms - including my own company's! Cheers
Admin  
#9 Posted : 21 October 2005 11:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard McLellan You can add BP to the list of large organisations that forbid use of mobile phones while driving on company business. "Engine on, Phone off" is the slogan Richard
Admin  
#10 Posted : 21 October 2005 13:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Sue Ryder Care, 2,500 employees. The company secretary (a Lawyer) banned it even before I was hired. We still allow hands free to be fitted though not used while driving. We've just had a MORR conducted by RoSPA and that says we should ban the fitting of hands free, which is good as that's what I want as well, John
Admin  
#11 Posted : 21 October 2005 14:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Hazel Harvey IOSH also have this policy for its staff on company business.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 21 October 2005 14:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Cr8r Be careful. If you ban hands free but your culture means that personnel will be expected to be contactable, then the reality is that they will answer their normal mobiles while driving as they fear reprimand and think the likelihood of an accident is minimal (a cursory glance will tell them whether they think they will get caught or not). A previous company did just this and the result was that almost without exception, people took and made calls while driving. It was against all the procedures and policy written down, but the underlying culture was that if you are given a mobile phone, you will jolly well answer it when it rings! If your culture is like this, then hands free will be the least dangerous option.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 21 October 2005 14:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Cr8r I should have added that hands free will be the least dangerous option until your culture has changed to totally ban the use of phones whilst driving! Good luck.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 21 October 2005 14:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Mathews My advice that the use of mobile phones, in any form, whilst driving should be banned was rejected. Then to rub salt into the wound I was asked to write guidance on the safe use of mobile phones whilst driving. Initially it was the shortest H&S guidance note that I have ever written: “DON’T”. Surprisingly, this too was rejected and I was asked to try again. So I wrote a quite long winded guidance note that when followed made it impossible to use the supplied hands free device whilst driving. That was accepted. My personal opinion is that whilst Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) (Amendment) (No. 4) Regulations 2003 does not make it illegal to use a hands free mobile phone whilst driving. Driving whilst at work should also be covered by the HASAW Act 1974, Section 2(2)(a) of that Act requires: the provision and maintenance of plant and systems of work that are, so far as is reasonably practicable, safe and without risks to health. Use of even hands free mobile phones whilst driving at work would not be a safe system of work. Richard
Admin  
#15 Posted : 21 October 2005 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Mace i am fairly new to this profession however, it has been statistically proven that not only mobile phones increase the risk of accidents occuring but all sorts of other things as well, i.e. talking to a passenger, listening to the radio, lighting a cigarette, changing the CD, therefore obviously hands free kits provide the same distraction. Options ban hands free - people will just start using phone again. Options ban passengers, listening to the radio, lighting a cigarette, changing the CD - it will never happen within todays society. Option change society and culture - isn't this what we are attempting to do, it will be a long hard slog, and probably not neccesary; eventually fuel will be in short supply (sooner than most people think) then governments will have to act to reduce mileages covered for buisness, conference and video calls will become cheaper and easier to setup, no need for buisness trips and no need for hands free kits eh voila safer society all round. sorry i was dreaming there a bit. However to the point in question present your advice to the board of directors, thats what we do "advise the safest course of action", they will then make an informed decision on the topic, if it is ban it ok, if it is to allow it then again "advise" the users of the risks and help them to make there own "informed decision", i have always found in life even with the smartest people tell them they can't do something and they invariably will, advise them properly and they will probably eventually go along with you. Remember were there to advise initially i think. Regards
Admin  
#16 Posted : 21 October 2005 20:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Hann This is an issue upon which I have spent quite a bit of time on over the past couple of years, trying with little success to convince senior management and various car driving mobile phone using employees that we should completely ban the use of hands free mobile phones free whilst driving on the grounds of safety. To help me to do this I have in the main used the excellent research and publicity materials which are freely available from the ROSPA web site. Our company policy on mobile phone use in vehicles, (not written or approved by me I hasten to add) whilst stating that using mobile phones whilst driving, even using hands free, is unsafe and should not be done, has no real ‘teeth’ and is quite openly ignored by senior management. The policy therefore lacks any legitimacy amongst the wider community of car driving mobile phone users, who in the main also just ignore it. The simple argument upon which I have been focussing is that your brain cannot concentrate on two separate fairly complex tasks at once i.e. driving and holding a conversation. This argument, whilst apparently accepted in some respects, is a little later rejected due to the perceived “commercial need to use the phone to do business”. The view seems to be that “our competitors do it and if we don’t, we will be at a real disadvantage”. I think that we all suffer from the fact that when mobile phone use in cars first started, there was no real body of evidence to clearly show the dangers. Now that there is plenty of supporting evidence around, phone use in vehicles has become so widespread that it is too difficult or uncomfortable now to be able to implement a total ban. I would warmly welcome hearing of any case studies that may exist about companies who have found workable solutions to this problem. I would also like to hear of as many companies as possible who have taken the decision to implement a total ban. The reason for my wanting this information is that there are one of two sceptics about, who believe there are very few companies around who have been able to do this. As evidenced by the likes of BP, National Trust, IOSH and Sue Ryder referred to earlier in this thread, this is simply not the case. Many thanks in advance for any advice or assistance you are able to give. Mike
Admin  
#17 Posted : 23 October 2005 09:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Webber Earlier posts said “your brain cannot concentrate on two separate fairly complex tasks at once i.e. driving and holding a conversation” and “The problem is that concentrating on the auditory input closes off visual input.” Really? Then how do rally drivers cope, and the police, and taxi drivers who all successfully manage to compute auditory and visual data streams simultaneously? Hasn’t evolution equipped us humans to do just that? It’s all a matter of competence isn’t it? Nagging spouses, crying babies, squabbling children, scenic views (attractive people), music, conversation, navigation, thinking etc. are all equally likely to form a deadly distraction for a minority of drivers. The competent majority are surely capable of driving, chewing gum and holding a phone conversation all at the same time. Shouldn’t we be campaigning to make mobile phones easier to use whilst driving, rather than adopting the Luddite approach of trying to ban their use entirely? Richard
Admin  
#18 Posted : 23 October 2005 20:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle I understand that the recent move towards recommending the banning of 'hands-free' mobile phones in motor vehicles arises from an Austrialian police study that established that in accidents examined 80% of the drivers were using 'hands-free' mobile phones at the time of the accident. I have however not been able to source the report, so if anyone knows where is can be sourced (via the intanet) I would appreciate the info. Stuart
Admin  
#19 Posted : 23 October 2005 22:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Webber Stuart The research was undertaken by Suzanne P McEvoy of the Injury Research Centre, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia Contact smcevoy@thegeorgeinstitute.org I am not convinced that prohibition is the correct approach, but I am open to persuasion. Richard
Admin  
#20 Posted : 24 October 2005 00:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Davies Severn Trent Water have now banned hands free kits, the motto is "missing a call won't kill you but answering it might"
Admin  
#21 Posted : 24 October 2005 02:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A. L. Ure International Association of Oil and Gas Producers 'Land Transport Safety Recommended Practice' April 2005: "Drivers shall neither initiate or answer a mobile telephone call while driving a vehicle (this includes text messaging and the use of hands-free devices)." The list members of the OGP is too long to list here, suffice to say it includes all the major players in the oil and gas industry. Andrew
Admin  
#22 Posted : 24 October 2005 09:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi Folks, Just to pick up on two old chectnuts cited by Richard Webber. Nagging spouses do distract, but if they're in the car with you they may notice an impending near death situation, if they're bending your ear on the phone, they won't. This 'point' is sheer man in the pubbery anyway; the evidence, not the theory but the evidence, based on studies around the world, is that talking on the phone is disproportionately distracting, whatever 'reasons' we can come up with to justify taking risks with other people's lives. The West Australian study is the most recent one, but I have seen references to scandiwegian studies and others reaching the same conclusions. As for the Police on their radios; their comms on radio are short and to the point, and they have been trained to deal with them. I do wish I could say the same for taxi drivers, John
Admin  
#23 Posted : 24 October 2005 10:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis The problem at the end of the day is that there are perceived benefits to the use of hands free phones. We are so busy formulating bans that we forget that human beings have brains and they will make the cost benefit decision. We need perhaps to train people in the responsible use of hands free kit, ie only when road conditions are suitable and thus bring in the sense of control that is lacking in any outright ban. One thing that will have to happen is for the television to stop showing the reality Traffic cops who are talking to their control mid-chase. If they can do it so can any experienced driver! - We all know how good our driving is !!!!!!!!!!! - its the other person. As for the Australian study - the risk increases for those who use a mobile phone, even hands free for the 15 mins afterwards. I think the figures were suggesting something like 50% of drivers involved in accidents had used a hands free within 15 mins of the accident. Thus using a telephone 24 hours before you drive is going to make it even more likely that you will have an accident (probably near 100%). I could make a case that says that drinking water, tea or coffee makes you accident prone. When the variables are removed from these kinds of study i will look at them seriously. Bob
Admin  
#24 Posted : 24 October 2005 10:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi Bob, I'm afraid I don't agree; it's not just the Australian study, all the studies so far published point to the same sort of conclusion; empirical studies and lab research, all strongly indicate that using a phone impedes driving performance. 3,000 deaths pa is far too high, and anything which might reduce this is good; I say this especially because I have enough imagination to see myself as one of the casualties. Employers can simply ban mobiles while driving, and discipline people breaking the ban; fifteen years ago we didn't have them, we didn't use them, and the world still turned. I never ever use a mobile while I am on the road and it has zero impact on my performance, especially as I can almost always stop within fifteen minutes and return a call, John
Admin  
#25 Posted : 24 October 2005 13:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eric Taylor Intersting point about the effect of using hands free affecting drivers for up to 15 minutes after the call. I do a bit of rallying. Sometimes there is road mileage in between the special stages, (fast bits). If I have been rabbiting on to my driver through the intercom, (just like hands free), then presumably I will be affecting his ability to drive? Transfer this to the world of professional rallying. Driving a car for some one else for gain is defiantely a workplace. Doing road mileage is definately a risk to other road users. Are you seriously telling me there is an increased risk from this sort of thing? Do we need a 15 minute head straightening period at the end of each special stage then silence inbetween? Most rally cars are so noisy inside that you need head phones and an intercom. Most professional teams can link in to the car by radio and mobile phone anyway. Where does this fit in. I don't see any difference between this sort of communication and hands free. I've never heard of any training for this in this situation. Can't help thinking it's getting a bit over the top.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 24 October 2005 14:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Just imagine also - I have taken a call in the motorway services and cannot drive for at least 15 minutes even if it was undertaken hands free. Where is the causal link in all of this. We have had this discussion before and such spurious statistics really do the anti hands free case no good at all. They simply make the person on the Clapham omnibus realise that the experts know a great deal about practically nothing in the real world. Many accidents happen close to motorway services so perhaps we should close them down and reduce the problems of people re-attuning to motorway speeds. Hands-free to accidents has yet to be proved to the same degree as cigarette smoking to lung cancer. Bob
Admin  
#27 Posted : 24 October 2005 16:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Bailey Thurrock Council (Essex) have banned hands free ever since the new laws came in. Peter Bailey
Admin  
#28 Posted : 24 October 2005 16:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Just a reality check here. When was the last time you made or recieved a really important call? You know, one that just could not wait. Most business phone calls are the "I'm on the train" variety made by people who "think" what they have to say is important - basically the dross of life. Its only 5 years ago these things were much rarer - and we managed somehow!
Admin  
#29 Posted : 25 October 2005 20:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Thanks Richard... Stuart
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.