Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 October 2005 13:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By P.J.O'Callaghan I am trying to get my head around a test paper question and would appreciate some help from someone who understands law. the question is as follows. " The Law of Tort and the courts play a major role in ensuring an adherence to health and safety in the workplace". Discuss this comment with referance to case law, and comment briefly on how the couts system could be reformed to improve health and safety in the workplace. I know that Tort is a wrong doing but I cant seem to get my head around this question. If you can be of assistance I would really appreciate your help. Regards. P.J.O'Callaghan
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 October 2005 13:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson Torts are civil rights of action for the recovery of damages by persons who have sustained injury or loss from acts, statements or omissions of others in breach of duty or contravention of right imposed or conferred by law. The same circumstances may give rise to claims for breach of contract or in tort. Many tortious acts are also crimes. Regards Adrian Watson
Admin  
#3 Posted : 23 October 2005 20:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Adrian, Staright from Tottenham matey!
Admin  
#4 Posted : 24 October 2005 11:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Talbot PJ, think of Tort, and Civil Law as the way that we as a society support those hurt by others. Whilst laws can be written and enforced by Government, they seldom allow for an individual to seek recompense for hurt. Tort (Negligence, Trespass, etc.,) allows an individual to seek justice for a 'wrong' and the Court decides whether that wrong was the fault of the other party. To succeed the wronged person must prove Duty, Breach and Damage. A duty of care was owed, a breach of that duty took place, and damage was suffered. It is an extreemly useful provision and is the very heart of the 'claims culture' which I personally think is more effective than regulation at times. You need to do some reading to get specific. Look up the cases of Donahughe (sp?); Bolton; Stevenson; and you will start to find other cases which should start to explain things. Get a book on English Tort - do a Google search.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 25 October 2005 09:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By stuart cross I think the more interesting part of this is the second...how can the part that reads: "comment briefly on how the couts system could be reformed to improve health and safety in the workplace." I think that the examiners are asking for an opinion on no fault liability here and whether the law should be reformed so that criminal law does not take presidence over civil law when someone is suing for recompence. Come on you clever people lets discuss this quesion and help PJ anyone can understand what Tort is....... ;-) Stuart
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.