Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
We seem to be getting rather pernickety with our English spelling and usage. So if I say that it is now time to boldly speak have I split the infinitive? Grammatically I believe not because the infinitive of the verb is Speak, not To Speak. But in my capitalisations, to make my point, I have committed grammatical faults to print.
As long as we can understand the message is there a real problem on these forums? I will, however, reserve the right to medieval punishments for treasonable speech where the words Principle Contractor are used as opposed to Principal; this right being reserved also for the users of the word banksman as opposed to signaller. It is non-pc and not recognised in the British Standard. Even the HSE cannot get this latter correct.
Bob :-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By fats van den raad
Bob... don't forget the old gramatical trip hazard... AFFECT vs EFFECT....
I am the first to admit that my spelling and grammar is atroc....att.... very bad, and as you say, as long as the message can be understood, who cares.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
One error that I find very disappointing is the frequent use of 'poffesional' on this forum rather than 'professional'. I would have hoped for better from professional persons. However, I prefer to avoid resorting to criticism of spelling here - having made the odd mistake myself.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Cr8r
Well done Robert!
As far as I'm concerned, I feel strongly that grammar, spelling and punctuation should be correct in publications and, for example on the television. It also reflects badly on the company if letters and other documents are badly laid out and have less than perfect spellings and grammar.
However, when it comes to personal notes, aide memoirs and even risk assessments, I don't care how they spell things or even if they don't know the correct name of something. The key to it all is COMMUNICATION. Is it clear to the reader what the author meant? If yes, then it matters not what the spelling is like. If there can be any confusion at all, then this is a different matter and needs attention. Usually, I have found that there is no confusion.
There is a time and a place when things really should be perfect, and a time and a place where it isn't crucial.
I would rather find a risk assessment with spelling errors than find that they hadn't done one because they didn't get O level English and haven't the confidence to spell.
PS - I did get O level English, so if there are any errors in the posting, I must have done it on purpose just to test you all (so don't bother pointing them out). Alternatively, it could be that it is some time since I sat the exam and I may well have forgotten it all by now.
A dearly beloved colleague of mine once took it upon himself to write some notes about his job to help others cover for when he went overseas for a while. English was not his forte, but his heart was obviously in the right place. His neatly typed papers were bound, the covers encapsulated, the title proudly proclaimed: "IDOT GUIDE". This was about eight years ago and he still gets reminded about it to this day. One example of perhaps where good spelling (or at least proof reading) is pretty essential!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Haynes
If you are really worried about spelling - go to 'Google' and download the Google Tool Bar. This allows you to spell check anything you type whilst on the web.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andy Petrie
Bopb, couple of points. What is the british standard, there aqre lots of them and I am sure banksman or signaller are not recognised in the majority.
Secondly, working in a railway environment a signaller has a specific job, controlling the signals, he's not the guy that helps reverse trains/trucks. That's a banksman.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
The BS referred to is the one on lifting and cranes - but there are also other references made in other documents. I am sorry the rail industry is so non-pc:-) but it doesn't mean that I cannot get on my high horse. I reserved the right to exact medieval retribution and I stand by it. One of the reasons I try to get the use of the word banksman eliminated is simply because it is so tied up with lifting situations. Also it winds inspectors up very successfully and diverts their attention away from what they were doing:-)
We are hung up by language and it is about time we recognise that there is a time and a place for accuracy and other times when communication of ideas is the key focus.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
If I asked for a signaller on a construction site I'd probably get a rude response. Banksmen direct delivery vehicles and heavy plant in difficult areas. It's a communication thing.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Mace
Why is spelling on this forum such an issue, most of us so called poffesionals (oops Professionals)tend to use some form of computer program to type now and they all come with spellcheckers (usually in american), due to this people become lazy as they don't have to think about spelling and grammar, this also allows them to concentrate on more important issues.
However if we are to have a discussion on English what about one on mathematics aswell, how many of us can remember pythagoras's therum or how to work out the cosine of a tangent.
Content is what matters not grammar. I have not as yet come across a posting that i have not been able to understand because of grammatical or spelling errors.
I do not have any English Qaulifications at all, yet i still managed to get 9 O'levels, 3 A' levels, a HND, and a degree.
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Hoskins
As I have recently posted to the 'other' earlier thread, it doesn't take much to proof read the preview before posting it to the Forum. We should at least be correcting any obvious errors at that point.
Alan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Philip Roberts
Not wanting to appear pedantic but I believe GRAMMATICAL has 2 M's in it
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Well spotted Philip but everyone completely understood what it was about!:-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
I can remember that we spent hours in primary school doing spelling tests and competitions (when we weren't reciting mathematical tables).
Presumably good spelling and grammar were considered to be indicative of application to accuracy and detail as well as learning ability. These days these can still be useful with regard to presentation and image within the professions. I must admit to being less than impressed by badly written reports and correspondence and to be more inclined to favourable consideration of requests for business when well-presented in a professional manner. There are times and places where spelling and grammar are of little relevance but I would not agree that this is always the case.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Philip Roberts
Robert,
My posting was tongue in cheek and I do have the Google spellcheck to help me. I am generally a poor speller and agree, if you can understand it why moan ?
best regards
Phil
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Talbot
I remember Pythagoras' theorem, and how to get cosine of an angle from the tangent ... but I haven't used them in so long I would gladly swap that knowledge for spelling skills.
We should all do well to remember that this forum is open to all and that will include some people with skills more useful than spelling and grammar. I don't know when I might need their advice. It would be appalling if they didn't help me for fear of being publicly corrected.
I would expect that those who have employed them, and those who rely on them for advice in their respective jobs are happy with their abilities.
We are all free to set English tests for those we wish to employ - but I think we should butt out of other people's esteem, eh?
E&OE (spelling)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By PaulA
Robert..
I cdnuolt blveiee that I cloud aulaclty uesdnatnrt waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnind. Aoccdrnig to a rsheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmaotnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer bein the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotle mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcusaea the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt..
The faster you read it the easier it is!
Was sent and thought of the critics on this forum....
Kind Regards All.. PaulA
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Mace
Paula
Absolutely brilliant
thanks, your article made me smile.
To Everyone,
However as pointed out by another post if people are publicly ridiculed on these forums for trying to help they will stop offering there help. I am like most of us i hope extremely busy and sometimes even knowing i have made a mistake with spelling on this or any other forum tend to ignore them for times sake, however all technical references and all letters, emails, fascimile's i send are always checked, it is after all supposed to be an area where we can gain access to help and assisstance.
Best Regards to All
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Ah, the useful mathematical information we all like to use like Cosh, Sinh and Tanh - I can still, with a bit of scratching of the grey cells, differentiate the odd vector or two and even use a cylindrical slide rule. What does one do without them nowadays. It certainly takes me back to the days of farthing blackjacks.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
That was enlightening, Paula. I too was able to read the entire message at normal speed - which shows that accuracy in spelling is not necessary for general communication where exact interpretation is unnecessary.
The two main problem areas for bad spelling (and, sometimes, grammar) seem to be: (a) where precision is important and errors could lead to misinterpretation; and (b) where a good or 'professional' presentation is important. Upon receipt of some letters from public bodies these days, I must admit to feeling an inclination to correct them in red ink and return them to the sender. If it makes me feel that they are employing people for a job (which includes a need to write on the body's behalf) who are unable to fulfill it in, at least, that respect or who have little concern about accuracy, I suspect that this impression is also conveyed to many other recipients of their communications.
Presentation and image have value in communication and business irrespective of whether the brain can sort out what was meant.
I never write to criticise the spelling or grammar of specific contributors on this forum and fully appreciate that their knowledge and ability in health and safety may well be superior but, at least this 'thread' has provided an opportunity to express concern at an apparent deterioration in the standard of written English and its possible consequences. Hopefully it has also persuaded some to spell ‘professional’ correctly.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martin Mulholland
I Cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alex Ryding
I assume that this will make peoples' teeth grind then?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By alex mccreadie
BS7121 PARTS 1,2,4,5 All state Slinger / Signaller and are as stated previously concerned with cranes and lifting. Even though it is wrong most people in the construction crane industry tend to call them Banksmen. And yes it was nice to see someone put the Grammer and Spelling thing in a proper context.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Alex
You may join me with your quartering knife!!
I think there have been some "unusual" responses but I have learned from the Cambridge research - Now where shall I allocate the CPD points for the learning experience and self development?
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
I can spell OK, but can't tpye very well! (numerous fingers and reasonably quickly but can't quite manage to hit all the right keys all the time:)). And what if our IT people won't give us the privileges we need to install the Google toolbar? Can't we have some sort of smell chucker on this forum?
John
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.