Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 06 December 2005 13:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Murphy If you have an enclosed area where painting is being done and the MSDS sheet says HANDLING CONDITIONS: Vapours are heavier than air and may spread along floors. They may form explosive mixtures with air. Prevent the creation of flammable or explosive concentrations of vapour in air and avoid vapour concentrations higher than the occupational exposure limits. In addition, the product should only be used in areas from which all naked lights and other sources of ignition have been excluded. Electrical equipment should be protected by the appropriate standard. Keep the container tightly closed. Exclude sources of heat, sparks and open flame. Non-sparking tools should be used. But there is no source of heating and it can be 0c at times, so they have an industrial propane heater, with flame, I know these MSDS sheets can cover every eventuality, so you would argue the heater must not be used in the area they are painting, so is there a better way of heating the area or do you just have to ask them to work in 0c the bulidiing is (10m x 20m x 5m high)
Admin  
#2 Posted : 06 December 2005 13:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Hi Alan To be honest, I thought that this was a "wind-up" at first but decided that it deserved a serious answer. You have identified several different issues in your question:- lack of heating; introduction of a serious source of ignition into a flammable atmosphere being the two most obvious! Other serious concerns arise from the potential for exposure of personnel to contact and airborne contamination and the failure to mention any form of LEV or RPE. Forgive me, but you haven't identified their existence or use. I am of the opinion that the situation as described warrants the most urgent action and your employer should be seeking and taking some serious advice about the items identified. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 December 2005 13:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Murphy Its no wind up i have just found out and am having a few stern words at present you have to remember as safety profesionals we only give guidance and let them know the consequences of their actions. You can take a horse to water but you cant make it drink. I am afraid you need the full backing of management to fully implement everything.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 December 2005 13:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Alan, If things are as you describe, you need to take more drastic action than a "word" and advice. I have authority (very rarely excercised) to stop work. As a professional, you need to judge if this is the time to do so. Sounds like a potential Stockline explosion (google this for consequences info for your senior management)on your hands.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 December 2005 14:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Murphy I have already stopped it, i was going to anyway, i suppose i am really looking for other ideas for means of heating now. Thanks for help anyway
Admin  
#6 Posted : 06 December 2005 14:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Alan You need to give more information on this. Is it a one off painting process for the structure itself? Is it an ongoing permanent process? What quantity is being used and how much is applied at any time? The actual levels encountered can be suprisingly low sometimes but it all depends on the natural ventilation. I have found toluene based paints in some areas giving less than 30ppm 1 metre from the workface. Having said that the use of direct propane heating needs to be very carefully assessed. Bob
Admin  
#7 Posted : 06 December 2005 14:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Talbot Hi, I can see why you are concerned. You do not state if the substance is used every day, what quantity and we know nothing of the room except its size and temperature. Forgive me if I am reading it wrong, but you don't seem to know: 1) what levels of the substance (vapours) are present 2) how those levels compare to EH40 and the data sheets 3) whether to believe the data sheets or not 4) what the 'appropriate standard' means 5) whether your colleagues are in imminent danger of explosion or poisoning If you were visited by an inspector, and large quantities were being used but you could not furnish the information needed to calm them down, I would not be suprised to see some severe action. I would suggest you call the manufacturer of the materials today and take some further advice. It may be that the quantity you use is not a problem, or it may not.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 06 December 2005 14:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Hi again Alan I didn't intend to imply that you were not being suitably responsible here. As an independant consultant I get to see a wide range of people whose sole interest in H&S has been as the result of something nasty happening and with the sole intent of getting the enforcer of their back! I very well appreciate the difficulties that you face and have great sympathy and respct for all those who conscientiously try to improve things - or at least get to a defensible minimum level of compliance. You know the answer to your problem already, I think. Regards Frank Hallett
Admin  
#9 Posted : 06 December 2005 14:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Murphy Right first things first, I have been at the company 6 weeks i am trying to instill a WHOLE new outlook to safety, I was alerted to this problem at 12.30pm today went straight to the site, did a standing assessment came back rang the company of the heater and rang ICI direct for their MSDS sheet of the wood preservative, then forwarded this on to our PPE suppliers who are ensuring we have the correct respiratory protection. Since collating all info I have stopped the heater being used and application until all the correct safety specifications are in place, Including a COSHH assessment which will show the need for testing and looking for safer alternatives. If i have missed anything out there please let me know. This is a symptom of bad practices where there should be a safe system in place to ensure these things are highlighted to the correct people before this process even takes place. I am working towards putting all these systems in place, as all good safety is built on sound workable policies, policed by competent management and superviaors on all levels. But i am afraid Rome wasnt built in a day. But it will be built As for the amounts, the wood preservative will be painted on all day for 8 Hours, and yes there is a liftable door at one end of room. Thank you again for all advice,
Admin  
#10 Posted : 06 December 2005 15:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Alan A whole new light on it here! Most wood preserving shops are as you describe - unheated and uncared for. I am just surprised that the paint on preservatives are being used widely as they are not actually very effective. The reality is that they are intended to be used as a cut end treatment because the pentration is relatively poor compared to vac-vac treatment. I think your managers need to have a process review to see if the task is really the best solution to the need, if it is essential then you may need to consider booths for the job with associated LEV etc. The exhaust fume from this may need to be scrubbed as well. It might surprise you how inessential a job can become if capital expenditure looms! Bob
Admin  
#11 Posted : 06 December 2005 15:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Murphy No this is alcholol based, harmful, irritant and flammable
Admin  
#12 Posted : 06 December 2005 16:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Just as bit puzzled in retrospect as I thought ICI sold the preservative side of the business. Are you able to identify the alcohol present as well as the other aromatics and aliphatics? This would give us some better idea. Bob
Admin  
#13 Posted : 06 December 2005 16:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Murphy 2. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS Substances presenting a health or environmental hazard within the meaning of the CHIP Regulations or which are assigned occupational exposure limits. EC No. HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS % SYMBOLS HEALTH R PHRASES Chestnut and Golden Brown: 265-185-4 NAPHTHA HYDRODESULF. HEAVY <10 XnN R65,66,51/53 265-196-4 PETROLEUM BITUMEN 5-25 Xn R40 265-150-3 NAPHTHA, HYDROTREATED HEAVY 2.5-10 Xn R65,66 232-315-6 PARAFFIN WAX <2.5 Unavailable ACYPETACS-ZINC 2.5-10 N R51/53 232-366-4 KEROSINE (PETROLEUM) 50-100 XnN R38,65,51/53 Acorn Brown and Rustic Green: 265-185-4 NAPHTHA HYDRODESULF. HEAVY <2.5 XnN R65,66,51/53 265-150-3 NAPHTHA, HYDROTREATED HEAVY 2.5-10 Xn R65,66 232-315-6 PARAFFIN WAX <2.5 Unavailable ACYPETACS-ZINC 2.5-10 N R51/53 232-366-4 KEROSINE (PETROLEUM) 50-100 XnN R38,65,51/53 Note: The text for R phrase codes shown above (if any) is given in section 16.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 06 December 2005 16:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Cannot see an alcohol here and you seem to have a garden furniture range of colours. My view is that you need to continue the review process. I think though that shop heating is out of the question at this moment. I think paint booths will be the best solution - good luck Bob
Admin  
#15 Posted : 06 December 2005 17:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Murphy Yes I realised that after on closer inspection, a manager told me it was alcohol based, but still flammable, ty for all advice anyway
Admin  
#16 Posted : 06 December 2005 17:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Kimmins Alan To help you... You need to contact an electrical engineer and ask them what 'Intrinsically Safe' (IS) heating options there are. IS is a definition of electrical apparatus that is suitable for use in various hazardous environments. In your case a flammable or explosive environment. All lighting, switches, fans etc.. also should be IS suitable. They will have a code on them IP##. The number suffix categoizes the equipments as what type of atmosphere it is suitable for. I believe Atex equipment in the UK supplies IS (IP rated) heaters for all zones. IP54 is the minimum to comply with Intrinsically safe. An electrical engineer or chemical engineer competent to assess hazardous area working should make this assessment and define the IP## of the equipment based on proximity to the source of the hazard. David
Admin  
#17 Posted : 06 December 2005 18:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Murphy Ty again for some good advice, what a day, allways something different to encounter in health and safety lol
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.