Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 22 December 2005 18:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PaulA Does a MIOSH with experience and working daily on matters such as manual handling, giving advice etc... allow for him/her to give training and certificate employees with manual handling training as required by Man Handling Regs? Your thoughts please. Kind regards PaulA
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 December 2005 18:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Fisher PaulA Depends - but on the face of it I would say not for Assessors but ok for Awareness. My thinking is that in achieving MIOSH that will have been achieved by generalist training rather than specific on MH. As for experience - no problems but with only experience and generalist training, how do you know your thinking is sufficiently right to enable you to competently train others at Assessor level. I would recommend you consider a course, such as RoSPA. Regards Bill
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 December 2005 23:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor The requirements will be for competence both in manual handling knowledge as a subject and in training. Personally, I have relied upon incorporating published training programmes or other training materials within in-house training - after having been the recipient of subject specific training myself in the past. However, when training moves from the general to the specific (eg from principles of manual handling and safe lifting to the use of specific items of equipment such as hoists we have brought in the specialists (eg from the equipment supplier).
Admin  
#4 Posted : 23 December 2005 09:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Paul In response to your request for 'Your thoughts', mine are simple but challenging. To the extent that you are thoroughly famililar with a. how to explain and illustrate the ergonomics of safe manual handling b. how to explain the essentials of the orthopaedic research of leading experts (e.g. 'Occupational Biomechanics' by Chaffin, Andersson and Martin, 3rd edition, 1999, Wiley), relevant to manual handling risks you will be in a position to gauge your strengths in relation to the learning needs of those you want to train. What I found remarkable in studying Chaffin et al. was how much they emphasise that they, the leading experts, don't know about orthopaedic conditions, even though they operate on them regularly. A useful analogy might be fire safety for a CMIOSH who is not a fire engineer. It is one thing to train staff in an office, shop or warehouse where the hazards are relatively straightforward but it is something else to do so in a chemical plant or with a mass transport system. While a M Sc in Ergonomics and Physiotherapy may appear to be an ideal qualification, if you have studied these two areaas alongside the experience you claim, you should be in a good position to evaluate your own competence level in relation to trainees' needs, with respect to the principle of working with your EXPANDING professional competence. Rather than a 'qualification', it may be more appropriate to have professional supervision from someone who can help you monitor the transition to a higher level of competence.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 23 December 2005 11:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeff Manion In general training and qualifications could be suitable for the individual, having knowledge and experience of the works(i.e. operations dept / office staff etc), relevant to tasks and environments involved using relevant examples. Knowing your limits of knowledge. Access to information could include: - Manual handling risk factors, How injuries occur, How to carry out safe manual handling – this includes good techniques, Appropriate and relevant systems of works – related to the individual tasks and environment, Use of aids and equipment, Practical work to allow the trainer to identify and put right anything the trainees in not doing safely. A quick selection of throughts. JM
Admin  
#6 Posted : 23 December 2005 12:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham Generic training is fine, How can you be confident that your giving good advice to individuals, sometimes capabilities are not fully know untill an injury occurs. In some cases the Injured person will not have known the had an underlying problem themself until they are recieving therapy for recovery
Admin  
#7 Posted : 23 December 2005 12:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fornhelper Good question Paul !!! My thoughts are that any 'generalist' CMIOSH who has read up on the subject, comfortable with legislation, good practice, etc should feel confident about providing training in most aspects of health and safety and, given their status, should be able to make that judgement call for themselves. I tend to get a bit p****d off at some H & S professionals who feel that all training courses need to be 'accredited' by some body or other (unless there is a legal requirement for this of course). One 'Head of Safety' I worked for even 'bought in' Risk Assessment training from a company because it was accredited even although there were 3 MIOSH H & S professionals working within the Section !!!!! In relation to 'manual handling' I would be quite happy to carry out basic training in this area as far as the lifting of 'loads' was concerned. However I recognise my competence in relation to 'person handling' and do not feel I have the knowledge, expertise or experience to train staff in this aspect of 'manual handling'. However, I do feel OK with training staff to undertake assessments for moving and handling (load & people handling) as long as the person(s) carrying out the assessments are competent in the area they are assessing. e.g. I may train an Occupational Therapist on how to undertake a 'moving and handling' assessment even though I am not fully conversant with 'O.T. practices' (how to use slide sheet, best walking aids etc.) In my book most H&S training is about passing on information, instruction, knowledge and experience and isn't 'rocket science' (despite what some training companies would have you believe!!!) If specialist knowledge is required then we demonstrate our competence by 'bringing it in' and enhancing our skills by learning from them. FH Hope you all have a great Christmas and lang may yer lum reek Slan
Admin  
#8 Posted : 23 December 2005 13:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan 'Formhelper' states the interesting opinion that 'In my book most H&S training is about passing on information, instruction, knowledge and experience and isn't 'rocket science' Truly, H & S training is neither 'rocket science' nor mainly about qualifications. But effective training does apply 'behavioural' science and has explicit regard for the motivation and learning-readiness of learners. To reduce H & S training to 'information, instruction, knowledge and experience' is a good explanation of why so much (well-planned, well-intended) training misses the mark and fails to adequately improve safety behaviour.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 23 December 2005 14:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jerry Lucey Hi Paula, Whilst many of the courses leading to IOSH membership will give you all the information you will be delivering on a manual handling course, it is worth considering that as part of a manual handling course you are not only passing on knowledge but also the practical skills involved with the safe handling of loads. The manual handling 'train the trainers' course will give you the skills and confidence to deliver this training and to demonstrate and confirm the practical aspects of the course. I think I speak for many people who have delivered training when I say that the first time you deliver a course is terrifying and many people freeze or panic. On a train the trainer course this is acceptable and expected and you will get the opportunity to build up confidence and develop your training technique in a supervised and sympathetic environment. I have witnessed many who were very well qualified in health and safety go to pieces when it comes to standing up and delivering training. One of the most important things with delivering training is the course content. It is important to record the course content of any training delivered and this is particularly important with manual handling training. I have undergone health and safety training courses and manual handling courses some of which were not IOSH accredited and I would strongly recommend undergoing training that is IOSH accredited as I have found the standard to be so much higher.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.