Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 01 February 2006 21:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Shane Durkan I wonder if anybody could help. I need to assess/audit an office workstation( chair desk,dse/ vdu... etc) as an employee is complaining of a sore back and is requesting a new chair, are there any standard questionnaires and if so where could I find them? Any help would be appreciated.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 01 February 2006 22:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Hi Shane You could start off by getting a copy of L26 - DSE Regs + ACoP and give the Schedule a good read. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#3 Posted : 02 February 2006 07:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Waddy Hi Shane Check out http://www.healthandsafetytips.co.uk/Downloads.htm this will help you get started. Cheers Bill
Admin  
#4 Posted : 02 February 2006 07:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Shane The HSE publication 'The law on VDUs An easy guide' provides guidance on compliance with the Health and Safety (Display Screen Equipment) Regulations 1992 as amended in 2002. At the same time, when someone is complaining of a sore back, you are faced with a symptom that could be extremely serious. As para. 13 of the ACOP of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations clearly states that in an 'intermediate' level of risk, you are advised to consult a specialist, this may well be a situation in which failure to consult a professional safety ergonomist, ie. a CMIOSH with an M Sc in Ergonomics, do so could become a false economy.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 02 February 2006 12:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jos Kieran, are you honestly saying that every time an employee complains of a sore back you need to bring in a person with CMIOSH with an M Sc in Ergonomics to sort it out ?
Admin  
#6 Posted : 02 February 2006 12:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan It depends on the extent to which you have the competence to assess an intermediate level of risk of a back injury. I don't generalise other than draw relevance legal situation to the attention of an enquier and let him assess his own competence. If you wish to read the voluminous literature on back injuries and relevant safety precautions, you may appreciate why, as a safety ergonomist with experience as an expert witness in the field of back injuries, I think it is wisest to underline the risks involved and to encourage members of IOSH to bring them to the attention of employers and employees at all levels. No more, no less.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 02 February 2006 13:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan In relation to Jos' question, there is an additional observation I should make - after hearing a lawyer's comments on settlement negotiations, on the lunchtime news. Unless Shane is thoroughly familiar with the Disability Discrimination Act, as well as prevention of musculo-skeletal injuries, he is at risk of failing to assess the situation he refers to adequately. As the employee has informed the employer of back pain, if the condition were to become a lot worse over time, the outcome could mean a claim under the disability discrimination legislation. Claims under this heading have, in principle, no upper limit and there is relatively little case law in the UK for guidance. If asked to assess the employee's need for appropriate work design and furniture, a CMIOSH with a M Sc in Ergonomics could be reasonably instructed to apply the DDA as well as health/safety legislation, or decline the assignment, in accordance with normal professional standards; a safety ergonomist who undertakes such an assignment is not in a position to set a quite arbitrary boundary and fail to give due attention to the implications of the DDA.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 02 February 2006 15:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jack ' - - ie. a CMIOSH with an M Sc in Ergonomics - -' Shouldn't that 'ie' be an 'eg'?
Admin  
#9 Posted : 03 February 2006 09:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alison Melrose OK, as an Ergonomist (who just happens to have MIOSH and is working towards Chartership) the main issue here is the person should be competent to perform the assessment. Whether they have CMIOSH or not is irrelevant..they should however have an understanding of posture and how to lay out a workstation properly. I give advice and recommendations - I NEVER force anyone to do anything they don't want to... However, I DO tell them why I believe they should alter their position / layout. If they fail to make the adjustments then I would write on their assessment form to indicate that they have been given suitable advice but had failed to comply, if their back pain were then to get any worse, the company should be safe as they had done as "far as reasonably practicable" to rectify the situation. Just because the person asks for a new chair, doesn't mean they NEED one! The chair could be adequate but the lumbar support is in the wrong position / they are sitting too low / the armrests are interfering with the desk etc...a qualified individual (e.g. ergonomist) would look at the posture and determine what the problem was (also by talking to the person to gain insight into when and where the discomfort is being experienced - it might turn out to have little to do with the workstation and could be their car / bed / number of pillows etc!). The DSE regulations are a good starting point so an employer understands the legal implications (all computer "users" should have an assessment performed - not just those that complain of discomfort). The Ergonomic Society can provide a list of qualified ergonomists that can help if the employer wants training or needs help. The main issue is that whoever does the assessment needs to have an understanding of the issues and how they can be rectified.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 03 February 2006 09:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Young So now we're saying that it takes a trained ergonomist to decide whether someone is sitting properly? Nice job if you can get it...
Admin  
#11 Posted : 03 February 2006 09:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alison Melrose Someone who is "competent". That can be an ergonomist, physiotherapist, GP etc - as long as they have an understanding of the issues [anatomy, physiology, biomechanics, psychology etc and have been trained to undertake display screen assessments].
Admin  
#12 Posted : 03 February 2006 09:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Young So by inference if you don't have that level of knowledge, any DSE assessment carried out by anyone else is incompetent as we don't have the necessary skills to interpret relevant information from the assessment. I don't think so!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 03 February 2006 09:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alison Melrose Ron, The DSE regulations call for the assessment to be performed by a competent person..it could be yer granny so long as she is competent! ;)
Admin  
#14 Posted : 03 February 2006 10:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Young Hi Alison, This isn't personal but there is a heavy inference on several postings suggesting that to be competent to carry out a DSE assessment one has to be an Ergonomist or have some form of medical qualification to know how to competently interpret DSE assessments. I'm sure thats not within the spirit of how the Regulations were written and I think it's way over the top on what is required for the vast majority of assessments. I do agree that there are times when we safety bods might require assistance from Occ Health, furniture suppliers etc. for someone with a specific problem but I can honestly say that in the 12 years of completing countless DSE assessments, I have never had any need to use an ergonomist. PS my dearly departed Granny didn't know what DSE was...
Admin  
#15 Posted : 03 February 2006 10:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Dear All There have been many observations on this [and other] threads referring to "sitting properly" and a great many apparently sensible, but inherently facile, comments made about it. Please remember that the commonly promoted model of the "begging dog" position is exactly that - a model. It has to be adjusted and modified to suit each particular user; and some users will simply not be capable of being comfortable in a chair that suits everyone else. For instance, an individual with lower lumbar degeneration will sit very differently to another. This is actually no different to the blind insistance on people "lifting properly" or the "those boots fit me so there's no reason that they shouldn't fit you" approach. All are fatally flawed as they fail to do what MHSW Reg 4 - Scedule 1 require - adapt the work to the individual. I could go on [and on, and on] but I'll let someone else have a go now. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#16 Posted : 03 February 2006 11:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alison Melrose I guess what I was trying to say is that whoever does the assessment should have received training on how to carry out an assessment and should be aware of what equipment / layout could be beneficial (or could actually make the symptoms worse - I've seen so many people misusing wrist rests in my time!). I should point out though that I've seen companies where an employee had attended a DSE trainer course and has carried out an assessment for a work colleague but been told "what do you know about..." and doesn't trust their colleagues judgement. We'd then get called in to give an "expert" opinion. OK, the employee might have adequate training and be fully competent to do the assessment but the organisation prefers a second opinion [usually this is where someone HAS a problem with their workstation and they aren't sure if what they are recommending will either help or hinder the person and they don't want to get it wrong]. Everyone is different but lack of knowledge (for example, knowing the back rest CAN actually be raised) often means the chair doesn't need to be replaced. Sure, if the user does have a medical need and if they've already tried altering the chair etc then an alternative should be tried. I'd suggest the company trial a number of chairs rather than buy the first "all singing, all dancing" one with hundreds of buttons on it though...
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.