Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Trudy Sharp
Hi there,
Big debate going on at my workplace at the moment. We have always advised that laboratory chairs should be imperveous to liquids, resistant to chemicals etc and this is company policy. We now have one specific team of people that are wanting to take upholstered chairs into a lab. Have discussed GLP, current policy etc with them but we're not getting anywhere. Does anyone know if there is actually anything in writing that states lab chairs MUST be impervious? I've tried the obvious legislation, British standards etc and can't find confirmation of that statement anywhere - all that I have found refers to benches, floors and walls - no mention of chairs at all. It's a long shot but it would be nice to wave a piece of paper in front of them! Their main objection appears to be that they don't want to sit on vinyl. Any advice or comments would be gratefully received.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Saracen11
Hi Trudy, like any other item of work equipment it must be suitable for the intended use, adequate in strength and stability (Inter alia/Etc…) Your RA will help determine the type of chair needed, a reputable supplier(s) will advise you on various models, the suppliers/manufacturers (?) of the substances used will also be able to assist.
Have you asked to question why they don’t want to sit on vinyl chairs; discomfort, sweatiness, allergic reaction etc… what are the other shifts views on this decision?
Refer the staff and managers to HSW sec7, 8 and MHSWR reg14. If that fails, contact your HR department (if you have) one to initiate disciplinary procedures – if your industry is as risky as your posting suggests, this action may be what’s needed when all the above fails.
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
A row about where laboratory workers put their bums sounds like the stuff of cartoons!
On 1 February, you wrote on this website: "... I have today managed to get our new H&S Policy and Arrangements, including the roles and responsibilities, agreed in principle. So I think I will go for attaching the H&S Policy and Arrangements to the letter and going for some thing along the lines of:
"Strong leadership is vital in delivering effective health and safety risk control. Your commitment is required to continuous improvement in health and safety and your actions and decisions at work must always reinforce the messages contained within the Campus Health and Safety Policy and Arrangements. ... In addition, you are required to ensure that local health and safety arrangements for your area(s) of responsibility are developed as necessary."
Where is the 'strong leadership and commitment' in the laboratory?
In its absence, to better understand the source of the opposition, invite the staff to complete a repertory grid with you. Wiley published a good guide to repertory grids by D Jancowitz in 2003.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Frank Hallett
Hi Trudy - go with Saracen on this.
1st question is - why the decision was made to have impervious chairs;
2nd question is - were the original criteria relevant and reasonable;
3rd question is - has anything changed to demand a higher standard;
4th question is - has anything changed to allow a lower standard.
Frank Hallett
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Trudy Sharp
Thank you for your time and advice - I'm afraid that no one has suggested anything that we haven't already tried. We've done the risk assessments, we've looked at all the options, and the only appropriate way to go for the laboratory concerned is impervious chairs. We've looked at vinyl, polypropylene etc but they want their upholstered ones - but don't seem to be able to provide a logical reason for this. Asking if there was actually a piece of legislation is my last ditch attempt at persuading them. Someone did suggest that the BS on laboratory design stated that lab charis should be impervious but I've trawled the document and can't find that anywhere. At the end of the day - all I can do is advise them, which I have done, and leave it to them. If they do not want to follow my advice that is their affair!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Trudy
From what you've written, you appear to be simply turning two blind eyes to the motivational issues involved.
Admittedly, the trouble about 'people' is that they have minds and emotions of their own, which don't fit snugly into codes of practice, 'legs and regs'.
Even if motivational issues are the most difficult, you can't truthfully say you've tried 'everything' unless you get to grips with them. The repertory grid technique is one, only one, of the radical approaches available to you along these lines.
From a more positive angle, 'safeguarding bums on seats' could be a relatively safe subject to address as a motivational point of entry to 'behavioural safety'.
Of course, the root paradox is that you too are free not to choose innovative ways of tackling a problem.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter
Trudy
What were the original reasons for specifying impervious chairs and have those reasons changed?
Paul
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Patrick Guyomard
It's a laboratory - do these boffins wear lab coats and wear safety specs? If so you can point to splashes, spills and contamination of chair covering (which don't get regularly laundered like the coats)and challenge them so look up the relative fibre absorption properties of chair and coat material and link this to the high surface area of weave - there's a nice research problem for them. Possibly even touch on the risk of different chemicals spilled at different times coming into contact leading to strange reaction dynamics. If they don't wear coats etc. No risk of spills - nice comfy chairs. 'Fundamentally' it's their problem as I'm sure they know enough about the chemicals they use to cover their...professional concerns
Sorry, should, but can't take this seriously - and I'm not sure if your reputation will be enhanced either way. I'd make your recommendations and move on.
Pad
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Frank Hallett
Hi Trudy
I, like a couple of others, have almost lost interest in this one. Not because we are dismissive of your problem however; simply because there is an apparent almost total failure on behalf of your fellow employees and the employer to recognise the fundamentals of safty management!
If the RA has been completed as impartially as it should, and it still indicates impervious chairs for the identified reasons, yet the users wish to use something else and they appear to be winning the arguement then it is clear that the term "safety management" means something very different to each of the parties involved.
My advice is to spell out exactly who will be liable for what if an event [of any nature] occurs - it doesn't matter whether it's followed by a claim but deal with that also - and make sure that all the recalcitrants get exactly the same information at the same time; then leave them to get on with their own devices and make sure that YOU KEEP THE EVIDENCE to safeguard yourself.
Frank Hallett
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mike
The situation that none of you has considered is that lab staff may be using PCs seated at their bench for hours at a time. Would it then be OK to ignore their DSE concerns. Hypothetical in this case I know since we don't know if DSE is involved at all.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Salus
I know it is not your compaany policy for these types of chairs but why can they not have the chairs? sounds like it could be cleared up with a good housekeeping procedure
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By James Perry
Might I suggest that you look to your HR department for this.
This appears to be a "refusal of a reasonable request" which in some circumstances can automatically break the employment contract. I.e. employee removed, problem solved.
It depends on your balance between promotion of good Health and Safety practice and enforcement of such.
(more advice from ACAS.co.uk)
Regards
Jim
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By James Andrew Scott
All of this sounds to have gotten really complicated, but the labs where I work have impervious upholstered chairs in various areas and these cause no problems at all. Have a look at what is available in lab supplies catalogues.
James
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jonathan Sandler CMIOSH
You might wish to wait till you have watched Alan Yentob's programme on the history of seating tonight after the news at 10 pm BBC1, can you get CPD points for watching TV?
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Thompson CMIOSH
what ever happened to section 8 of haswa
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Diane Thomason
Trudy,
You may be interested in this - when one of our lab suites was visited by a HSE Specialist Inspector, one lab was found to contain an old wooden stool. We were asked to remove this as the expectation of the HSE was that in an area such as this (biohazards) the chairs/stools should have a wipe-clean impervious surface. (which is in fact what we have in all our labs - the wooden one was an oddment!)
I agree with Frank - make your recommendations with reasons, document your evidence and leave them to make the decision. Seems to me this is one of those petty We Don't Wanna Be Told What To Do arguments from their side - but you are right.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Redfern
The HSAC booklet 'Safe working and the prevention of infection in clinical laboratories and similar facilities, states that 'Other fittings and furniture also needs to be constructed from hard-wearing, easily cleaned materials with impervious surfaces that are resistant to damage by stains or chemicals'
I realise that this is guidance but still best practice.
Redders
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.