Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 13 February 2006 13:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anne Smart This year’s IOSH conference and exhibition, entitled ‘Health and safety: fit for business’, launches at ExCel in London on March 13. In the weeks leading up to this 2-day event we will be polling for your views on topics addressed by the difference tracks within the main programme. (1) What is the greatest challenge to communicating health and safety within your organisation? Anne Smart, IOSH media and marketing assistant
Admin  
#2 Posted : 13 February 2006 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Hay 1) The fact that a lot of people still see H&S as getting in the way of geting the job done. 2) H&S vs profit. Paul
Admin  
#3 Posted : 13 February 2006 13:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tracy W The problem I have is that management have no time for administrative issues, such as H&S, because they are too busy with business. Although H&S is statutory it is non profit making. Staffing levels are being cut and the role to support implementation of H&S is being compromised. As an aside, I was a little disappointed in the two day schedule because the main threads I am interested in fall on the same day 13th, with little interest in the 14th. Trouble is I can't be in two places at once and thought it might be useful to air this view. My preference would be that future event schedules mix issues such as best practice/legal [probably two of the most important threads] with the more practical case studies over the two days permitting more choice. Is there the option to obtain copies of presentations if you are unable to attend? Thanks
Admin  
#4 Posted : 13 February 2006 13:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gordon Thelwell Good question! The main obstacle i find is that i am biased by my qualifications and experience. Try as we all do, how do we transfer our message effectively to 'non aware' persons regarding health and safety?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 13 February 2006 14:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Talbot Without a doubt, misconception. Despite your understanding, and my understanding, and all our joint efforts to educate and inform, the basic concept remains a mystery to many. This is because it is still a young subject and has yet to become as commonplace as financial awareness. With practice, we will get there.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 13 February 2006 18:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Ignorance!!!!! That is, ignorance of health and safety by middle and senior management. They need to be educated and I am not talking about regulations, but in the subtle aspects of implementing and managing policies. For example, if another manager tells me that all accidents and incidents are preventable I shall go mad. Zero Tolerance is a theory, whilst it is a noble concept, it has no place in reality. Sorry about the mantra - it's been one of those days. Ray
Admin  
#7 Posted : 13 February 2006 19:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Hi Anne What do I think? First, your question assumes that all your readers are "employees" - they aren't! A substantial number of H,S,F&E professionals are self-employed. But don't feel too bad about that - the HSE and the IR frequently make the same assumption. Second, considering the current and recent threads regarding Professional Competence, Job Descriptions for H & S positions and the total nonsense surrounding the many so-called "passport" schemes in the context of your question:- The greatest challenges are all about getting an adequate level of understanding across all industry of the FUNCTIONS of those who give H,S&F advice, ensuring that those who write job specifications have some understanding of the level of competence required to adequately fulfill those posts, and gaining a genuine equivalence for the myriad of non-professional and basic H,S&F qualifications that each industry has spawned and holds dear "because they're our qualification" - such arrant and arrogant nonsense!. The reality that a very large proportion of employers & employees simply see what we do as a LOSS to the business will only start to be remedied once we get the other issues sorted out. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#8 Posted : 14 February 2006 18:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Milne Hi Anne, In my experience, limited to manufacturing, the greatest barrier to health and safety communication has been the misunderstanding of what communication entails by management at all levels. I say management because they are responsible for the health and safety performance of the organisation with the top man taking ultimate responsibility. Effective communication, within an organisation, is much more than telling people what they should be doing or informing them of past performance and future goals. Communication has developed as a social activity that bonds and defines the acceptable behaviour for the social group and it should be noted that over 50% of that communication is non-verbal. A number of years ago a newly appointed departmental manager rang me with an urgent request for information, “A folk lift truck has run over a rodent bait box and smashed it, the contents are spread around, what should I do?” I explained the safest course of action and carried out a post incident risk assessment that included the instructions for safe disposal of the rodenticide were this to happen again. A few hours later I presented him with the documentation and advised that he communicate the contents to those at risk. “How do I do that?” he asked; “Just use your normal lines of departmental communication” I replied and was met with a blank look. At that moment the penny dropped and I understood the barriers to effective health and safety communication. The effectiveness of communicating health and safety information is dependant upon the efficacy of communication generally within the organisation. I am sure we have all experienced managers making excuses for errors rather than apologising and asking for the assistance necessary to be successful. This attitude leads to problems not being communicated upwards with the result that remedial action cannot be taken; this is particularly true for health and safety issues since they are often perceived as the most difficult to resolve. I say perceived because the most difficult issues to resolve are those of inappropriate management (does not meet the buisiness needs of the organisation); if that issue can be resolved then the communication of health and safety information will be effective. This is a very short reply to a BIG question. My message is that if organisations wish to improve their health and safety, then they should understand that a poor performance in safety is a symptom of ineffective management and not something to be rectified in isolation. Regards, Richard.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.