Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 22 February 2006 09:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anon1 Hello all, A scenario as follows: Imagine a Group X. Within this group there are a number of separate companies - Company A, Company B, Company C, etc. Now, Company A has a union and union safety reps, but the rest do not. A few of Company A's employees who are union members are working on Company B's premises, and Company B does not have a union. The Company A employees working on Company B's premises will in the not too distant future become employees of Company B. In the meantime, does a union safety rep who is a Company A employee working on Company A's premises have any right to represent those Company A employees working on Company B's premises, or have they any right to even be on Company B's premises? Long term what might happen is that once everyone working in Company B is an employee of Company B, they may well join a union for themselves and appoint their own union safety reps (it may or may not even be the same union), but as Company A and Company B are separate companies, won't union activity in Company A be totally separate from union activity in Company B? It just all seems a bit messy in the meantime. Would appreciate your views. Thanks.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 February 2006 11:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Sanders The union safety rep, represent Company A employees regardless of where the actualy work. Steve
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 February 2006 11:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi Anon, The ACOP and guidance to the committees and reps regs seem to use 'employees' and 'workplace' almost at random and interchangeably, though you could build a case for saying that reps represent their fellow employees wherever they are working. The duty to inspect, though, refers explicitly to 'the workplace' and this could be an obstacle. However, I'd go back to 'The duties to co-operate and co-ordinate measures relate to all statutory duties' which is para 70 of the guidance to the Management regs, and get the two employers to reach a formal agreement on this in consultation with the TU involved about who can represent whom and in what context, John
Admin  
#4 Posted : 22 February 2006 12:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett I'ld go with the previous comments. To support John Knights comment re "the workplace"; a couple or three years ago there was a relatively unknown case relating to a TU Rep who was disciplined [subsequently upheld by the EAT] for exercising influence outside the area for which he was elected to represent. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 February 2006 12:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anon1 OK. Now let's take things a bit further. What would happen if management of Company B said that they didn't want Union Safety Reps from Company A on Company B premises? What recourse would either union safety reps from Company A, or Company A employees working on Company B's premises, have against Company B? I am thinking none, because Company B is neither the employer of the Company A employees (yet) nor the Company A union safety reps, and the legislation only sets out duties for their employer (Company A, not Company B). Thanks.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 22 February 2006 13:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Simpson You have to make suitable arrangements for consultation with all employees on health & safety regardless of whether this is done through an elected representative or to groups as a whole or alternatively each individual & regardless of whether union affiliated or not. So who represents the non-union workers in company B at present or are you using one of the other two options.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 22 February 2006 15:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Devlin The H&S reps in company A would be entitled to look after the H&S issues of the members under their remit even if they did indeed work on company B's premises which would mean inardvertantly they would be looking after the H&S issues of the staff in Company B by default. As mentioned in the reply before this even if there isn't a union per se then the employer is still entitled to consult with its employees on matters affecting their H&S. There is documentary evidence that unionised workplaces with recognised H&S reps are safer than non unionised workplaces. In the end it will be the employees who will decide whether they are in a union or not and the company will have to accept this.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 February 2006 16:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Hines Hi Anon Having read your posting one thing jumps out at me straight away Reg 11 MHSW regs. Company B many not be happy about it but Company A need to address it with them and set up arrangements for their reps to visit in the same way as they do on Company A's other sites Hope this helps
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.