Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 22 March 2006 11:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AJM Hi Just a short one i hope. About one of the hardest tasks for us safety chappies. I am in the process of setting up a control of contractors policy and Permit to work system. I just wondered when talking about getting Risk assessments or method statements from the contractors before work, would you advise that they MUST supply a risk assessment and method statement for every single job no matter how small. For instance just coming on site for an hour to do a simple repair. Or just demand them for the dangerous work covered on the permits like working at height or working on live equipment or big full day repair work. The thing is all contractors that will be working on site will have to sign a permit to work as well as the visitors sign in book. I am just trying to look at the practicability's here. Or would it be simple to just say all contractor work on site requires risk assessment and method statement. Bare in mind I am setting everything up from scratch here. Regards Alan
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 March 2006 17:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Alan I would suggest that a MS should be required for each and every job, in principle that is. Obviously if the task is so small and simple then one may not be required. But make sure you have a copy of their RAs. RAs are normally attached to MS and tend to be generically orientated, otherwise if you are using the same set of contractors, then once they have supplied a generic set of RAs there is no need to provide them for every task. Even 'stealth and hasty' has a modicum of commom sense! Regards Ray
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 March 2006 18:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Altoft to issue a permit to work you need to be sure those undertaking the work are aware of the risks and have a safe system of work that reduces risk to them and others around them incl no doubt your own employees ALARP. Hence you need RA plus MS for whatever the PTW covers. If it is so low risk not to need RA plus MS then why the PTW?? Contractor signs onto PTW to accept it but you issue it so by setting them to work so your call. As to extent then suitable and sufficient of course comes to mind R
Admin  
#4 Posted : 23 March 2006 08:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Whaley If you would like to email me I can send you details of our contractors pack. While it would need personalising it would be a good starting point and save you alot of time. David
Admin  
#5 Posted : 23 March 2006 12:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AJM Thanks for all the advice as usual, but looking at it as a lot of health and safety it can be taken in different ways and very hard to draw that difinative line. To simply say yes risk assessment for all tasks or not is not as easy as it seems. Thanks anyway Alan
Admin  
#6 Posted : 23 March 2006 12:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Simpson AJM Is a robust permit to work system not a suitable control measure in itself, without the need to have additional documentation to cover every task? MS
Admin  
#7 Posted : 23 March 2006 12:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Bish However detailed the contracotrs method statements and risk assessments (generic or task specific) may be, they are worthless if his staff,or sub contracotrs carrying out the work do not observe them. It may be worth ensuring the contractors provide you with a list of his employees who he confirms will comply.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 23 March 2006 21:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steven bentham As part of the 'how far', you may wish to consider the risks involved: Are you a low or high risk industry? Is the contractor carrying out low or high risk work? My view would be the degree of control should relate to the amount of risk. Probably worth considering that no amount of paperwork makes high risk work safe.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.