Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 March 2006 14:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Having just advised a client to get his factory electrical installation checked out by a competent electrician and obtain a Certificate of Conformity from a NICEIC-approved contractor, I was challenged to come up with any evidence of prosecution under relevant legislation for failure. Client states his in-house electrician does all that is necessary but cannot produce any documentary evidence to verify this. Whilst they will probably comply, does anyone have any pointers to support my argument so that senior management can see the benefit?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 March 2006 15:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel try the companies insurers / other insurers - as its when there is a claim that the problems come out e.g. insurers will not want to pay-up if adequate / competent proof of maintenance etc is not available do not know of any cases to hand
Admin  
#3 Posted : 24 March 2006 18:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lesley Palmer Hi there My son is NICEIC inspector its amazing how many he fails. There are an awful lot of 'electricians' out there who do not have the required training updates, qualifications or experience. Like most things its ok as long as nothing goes wrong, but the minute it does there will be hell to pay. Son always advises where they are going wrong and how they can get it right for next time. Company should be insisting sending electricians on updates. good luck Lesley
Admin  
#4 Posted : 26 March 2006 12:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle IEE 16th Edition (BS 7672) provides tables (recommended guidance) on how often different types of premises should be electrcially inspected. Ergo this is the driver. The docuemnt also provides forms to be completed on any such checks carried out, ergo the records. If the inspection(s) are carried out by a qualified electrician they should be using the IEE 16th Edition as their guidance document and carrying out the checks in accordance with the specifications, recording the findings in the prescibed format on the forms provided that shoulds be maintained as records (evidence). The IEE 16th Edition (BS 7672) would be 'held-up' by the enforcing authority as the approved recommedations, guidance and method for such work, therefore compliance with these requirements should be undertaken in the workplace where electrical checks are being undertaken. Stuart
Admin  
#5 Posted : 27 March 2006 10:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Thanks for the comments. Still looking for any prosecutions for failure to maintain.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 27 March 2006 10:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith E I would have thought that any prosecutions are more likely to be under the general maintenance requirement of HASAWA '74 (Sec 2), rather than the specific Electricity at Work Regs. Search the HSE prosecutions database, on their website for info etc.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 27 March 2006 10:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Thanks, Keith. HSE has no listed prosecutions under Elec Regs specifically for failure to maintain. Think I'll give up on the search and fall back on my persuasive powers to convince the duty holder!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.