Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 April 2006 11:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fred Pratley We are a manufacturing company - average age 40+, and I am being asked if it is OK for 1st aiders to undertake "simple" treatments i.e. apply deep heat/Ralgex/Ibuleve gel or give out support bandage etc. (Been overdoing it in the garden at the weekend etc) I appreciate that the 1st aider has to be willing to lay hands on the masses etc, and they would need to have accurate records of what they did to who, so that we don't miss the early signs of a possible RSI. However, what do others expect of their 1st aiders? Thanks Fred
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 April 2006 11:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Talbot Seriously suggest you do not require or even encourage first aiders to do anything they are not taught on the first aid course approved by HSE.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 April 2006 11:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Salus Hi Fred I would not expect any of our first aiders to apply the treatment you mention. They do, manage any incident / carry out resuscitation / treat any symptoms of unconsciousness / control bleeding / treatment of any shock / treat burns,scalds,fractures,cuts, eye injuries and keep records. As you are concerned about RSI or upper limb disorders, identify the tasks where it might occur and reduce by changing times / or work procedures. Look at HSE guidnance INDG171 may well have been revised
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 April 2006 11:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Carrick I would echo the thoughts of others Fred – first aiders must stick solely to what they have been trained to do. As an example, your first aiders may not be aware that the person they are attempting to treat is allergic to the “medication” – consequences could be dire. Jon
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 April 2006 12:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tulsa Mclain Iam a first aid intructor with one of the vol org I teach public first aid Assess for FAW, and I also teach Resus support and de fib trained . You can only do what you have been trained to do in line with the FAW . First Aiders should not go beyonded this. Tulsa Mclain Fi
Admin  
#6 Posted : 20 April 2006 13:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kate Graham First aiders are usually told in their training not to go beyond it. Kate
Admin  
#7 Posted : 20 April 2006 13:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Patrick Burns CMIOSH - SpDipEM - MIQA It is First Aid at Work and therefore refers to treatment as a result of injury at work. Anything out with I would discuss with employee to ensure it will not affect their current task and if it does or they are in some sort of pain get them to arrange to see their GP or A&E if deemed appropriate.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 20 April 2006 13:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson I can echo the sentiments as an EX paramedic and First Aid Instructor, first aid is just that, giving other treatments is NOT First Aid and should be discouraged. A first aider will not be undertaking there role as a first aider if they are giving second aid.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 20 April 2006 18:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Cooper-Abbs The following is an extract of a letter from the HSE, london to the administrative officer - training, british red cross society. As you know, the contents of first aid boxes required under the health and safety (first aid) regualtions 1981, should not include medications of any description, and the training of a first aider does not include the dispensing of medication. ( I would suggest the products you mention in your post ciould be classified within the text above) Our firm advice, therefore, is that first aiders working without medically qualified supervision should not dispense medication of any description, and that employers would be very ill-advised to authorise them to do so. Should any injury arise as a result of the actions of the first aider, the ordinary civil law of negligence would apply, The general view is that if a first aider appinted under the 1981 regualtions, acts in the course of his employment in administering first aid then his employer could, therefore, be held vicariously liable for any such negligence. Where first aiders work under the supervision of a doctor or qualified occupational health nurse, it would be for the doctor or nurse in charge to decide whether they were prepared to take responsibility for, and train their first aiders in, the dispensing of non prescription medication.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 20 April 2006 19:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By kanta First Aiders should never go beyond what they are taught as First Aiders. Treatment should only be given to prevent fatality,not muscular pain. RSI should be reported to occupational Health dept,and be treated seriously. If you have an ongoing Risk Assessment programme,this hould identify area at work that may cause RSI.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 21 April 2006 01:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brett Day Am ex RAF Search & Rescue, we did air ambulance duties and having been called out where a First Aider has made the situation worse by giving medication to a casualty am whole heartedly in agreement with Dave. Would also second Chris' comments and extract, was quite worried when I attended my first 'civilian' FAW course (run by a VERY well known organisation) who gave a list of medications to keep in a first aid kit!! Have since had refreshers run by Essex Ambulance Service who make it quite clear, NO medications, NO (surgical) procedures and NO Physio type treatments.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 21 April 2006 08:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fred Pratley Many thanks to you all for the quick and positive response, and particularly Chris for the extract of the HSE correspondance. I'm going to enjoy today........ regards Fred
Admin  
#13 Posted : 21 April 2006 09:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Hi Fred Whilst I will not disgree with anything that has been said earlier; I do wish to draw your attention to the need [as identified in the FaW Regs] for employers to consider whether the standard 4 Day FaW course is sufficient for their needs in the workplace. Consequently, there is an explicit requirement placed upon the employer to provide additional training in topic ares that are sen as necessary but not covered by the standard - very basic - FaW course. Have a good day! Frank Hallett
Admin  
#14 Posted : 21 April 2006 16:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC Agree with the rest - no potions, lotions or creams except where exceptional circumstances exist – as, for example, in the case of plating where substances containing cyanide are used. Whether you do plating with cyanide solutions on a regular basis, or just occasionally, you should always have an antidote kit on hand. These are available only with a doctor’s prescription, and you will need to keep track of the expiration date. Don’t tuck it away in a drawer or cupboard; if you accidentally ingest cyanide, you have only seconds to use the antidote successfully. Obviously the nature of your work should dictate what precautionary actions you should take and which employees must be specially trained accordingly.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 22 April 2006 13:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman With our plating plant, gold cyanide and tin/lead plating, we trained ALL operaters on first aid treatment of cyanide absorbtion. It was a good way of getting them serious about avoiding contact. And the treatments were in break-glass boxes. Never used one of them Merv (back to the hammock) Newman I remember having to calculate maximum release if we mixed all of the cyanide with all of the sulphuric acid. How would it affect the old peoples home 100 metres from the site ? Try it yourselves. 500 litres of AuHcn at 25% and 500 litres of H2So4 at 98%. 100 metres to the nearest window down wind. Emergency evacuation or just keep the windows shut ? (hint ; you have to look at the toxicity of HCN taking into account the fragility of pensionners) And dynamic dispersion models. Yo ! No worries Merv
Admin  
#16 Posted : 24 April 2006 08:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fred Pratley Hi Merv, We used to do plating with all the good stuff you mention and had 1st aiders trained accordingly (as Frank already mentioned) - However, we gave that up some time ago (good old EPA and Cadmium authorisation saw to that), so now the worse I have left to deal with is the likes of concentrated Hydroflouric. We don't use breakglass boxes - better to have security seals I think. Already have the Defib, and considering Oxygen training as well. Presumably your assessments took account of prevailing wind direction? Also should include local geography. Fumes will concentrate quite well if blown uphill by wind. Thanks again for the positive responses. Fred
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.