Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 25 April 2006 12:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stewart Fullarton Hi All, Just after some advice. After 13 years our factory is to close and just become a distribution centre - employing 3-5 people mostly in the warehouse with the main office area in the front of the building being for the most part unused. we have a lift in the office area, and our parent company want to cancel the maintenance contract when the unit becomes distribution only. My concern is this - the front offices will still be open and the company is still a going concern. The lift has to be maintained by law, and it is there for disabled access and in my opinion the lift still needs to be maintained for use if ever a disabled worker is employed ??? However, they want to cut the power to the lift and sign it appropritly and cancel the contract. I have suggested that the company must still have the intention of re-instating the contract if the lift is required in the future. Will this course of action suffice ???? Any comments would be much appreciated. Stew
Admin  
#2 Posted : 25 April 2006 12:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sean Fraser Stewart, If the lift is being physically decommissioned and DEFINITELY cannot be used, then I see no reason why it would need maintained beyond structural inspections and possible fire hazard (accumulation of debris etc.) from time to time. However, if the power is just shut off, then the inevitable will happen - the sneaky little tykes will go switch it back on when no one is looking and start using it again until the odd occasion becomes current practice and it is in use daily. If that is the case, you are right to insist that the LOLER inspections and routine servicing arrangements are maintained.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 25 April 2006 14:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney I feel you need to investigate this much further; LOLER and Fire risk assessment spring to mind. Ensure you document all your procedures carefully.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.