Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 28 April 2006 18:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By phil beresford Does anyone know of any figures published which say how much a particular company spends on H&S as a % of income or turnover. Obviously this will vary vastly between organisations with high risk businesses spending more than lower risk ones. It has generated an interesting discussion at work just wondered if anyone had ever put any numbers to it.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 April 2006 20:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman We had a thread on this about two weeks ago. If you ccan't find it get back to me. By the way, H&S is a profit centre. Merv
Admin  
#3 Posted : 29 April 2006 01:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd http://www.hse.gov.uk/businessbenefits/index.htm http://www.gnn.gov.uk/co...reaID=2&ReleaseID=195096 http://www.edp-uk.com/ne...rs/healthsafetycosts.htm But you can also have the costs calculated for you:http://www.hse.gov.uk/costs/index.asp
Admin  
#4 Posted : 02 May 2006 08:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By phil beresford Thanks for replies - I'm really looking for what companies invest H&S as a proportion of their income or turnover.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 02 May 2006 09:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Longhurst What an excellent topic. I too would be interested but would like to be able to contextualise any figure by making comparisons to spends for HR (particularly training), Sales and Marketing, any private medical cover and , lastly, pension provisions. I am hoping that direct comparisons between companies will provide corroborative data to support the contention that those deploying H&S and training actively are financially healthier, more competitive organisations. If I come across any such data I shall certainly let the list know. Andrew
Admin  
#6 Posted : 02 May 2006 14:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Talbot How will you tell? If the safety culture is successful, H&S costs will be completely embedded in operational costs (selection of suitable contractors, provision of safe equipment, proper maintenance schedules, employment of competent persons, etc., etc.,) I am trying to convince people that H&S is not a strap-on extra. So I would suggest that it probably resists being 'countable'.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 02 May 2006 14:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Longhurst Hi Mark, There are some interesting case studies on the HSE site with one in particular relating to the construction industry. The stats quoted suggest they view the H&S effort as an embedded operational cost but when contactced directly they suggested, as part of their participation in the HSE's Good Neighbour initiative, that the breakouts for the different cost centres, including H&S, woukldn't be hard to do nor would a comparison of before they instituted this regime and after. The real difficulty was whether this info was commercially sensitive if released into the public domain. For my part, I am trying to understand what degree of importance is attached to H&S through looking at both year on year spend and through comparison to other budgets. If enough granularity of data from different industry sectors and different approaches to H&S culture is available it may help me understand some of the financial drivers and therefore the barriers to imbueing a culture of H&S. I realise the financial data are not the whole picture, indeed I am in constant discussion with organisations as regards their stated reasons, but the finacail data may prove a useful additional tool when examining this area. Regards Andrew
Admin  
#8 Posted : 02 May 2006 14:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham I agree with Mark. The cost of health and safety provision should not be a separate item but an integral part of how any work is performed. Perhaps more importantly, how are you going to quantify the cost-effectiveness of that spend? If a company spends 2.5% of turnover on H&S but as a result saves 15% in lost time, reduced compensation and employer liability insurance premiums etc. and another spends 1.5% but sees only a 2.5% saving in return, which is the better? I entirely agree with Merv. H&S should only ever be considered as contributing to the bottom line. Anything else is counter-productive.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 02 May 2006 15:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AlB As the owner of a well known budget airline company once said: "You think health and safety is expensive - try having an accident!" Enough said!
Admin  
#10 Posted : 02 May 2006 17:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Longhurst Reality is that businesses will ask providers of services, internal or external, to justify their spend. If the spend is justified solely on grounds of compliance it is a wasted spend equating to more than buying a license to allow trading to continue. Even though true suggesting the cost should be embedded in operational OH is still going to raise the question "But how much cost and how can I save on it?" In essence, many companies that still see H&S as solely a cost item need persuading that it is instead an investment item. As with any investment, businesses like to know what returns they might expect for a given investment. Discounting this view is to risk alienating those for whom a good business case will encourage investment in H&S if presented in a way they can appreciate immediately. Andrew
Admin  
#11 Posted : 03 May 2006 08:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman To go back to the answer I gave a week or two back - during the 16 years I was plant H&S there was never a "safety" budget. My boss was HR manager so my salary came from his budget. Other H&S subjects were integrated into production/management budgets. PPE was a production cost just like spare parts. Machine guarding or whatever were in design and purchase specs. Extinguishers and emergency showers were part of the building fabric same as doors and windows and looked after by maintenance. Periodic tests of lifting gear and electrics were also a maintenance responsibility. The few bits of kit I did require (air sampling pump, noise meter) were purchased by medical, which was also in the HR budget. Total integration. And only one LTI in 16 years So check out the "average" cost (including "indirect") of a "normal" accident. Multiply that by your current LTI rate. Divide that by your salary (or just subtract it) and show your boss how much H&S can really be worth to his bottom line if only he would let you get on with your job and back you up when the accountant starts whinging. Merv Now I've got to shovel a cubic meter of compost out of the trailor.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 03 May 2006 09:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tom Doyle I did quite a bit of work on this topic last year. What I found was that for the most part hidden cost figures that were available were industry sector specific and therefore of very little use in many situations. ISI has created a calculation sheet to demonstrate the effect of lost time injuries on profit. The user is able to enter values by selecting from about 35 cost elements for up to ten LTIs. The overall cost is then devided by the average # of accidents and subtracted from the projected profit. This tool is quite effective in demonstrating the impact of even a small accident. The sheet was created on a machine with 1280 x 1024 screen resolution . Anyone who would like a free copy of the file please e-mail me off the list. Please include your contact information in your request. Kindest regards, Tom Doyle Industrial Safety Integration tj.doyle@industrialsafetyintegration.com
Admin  
#13 Posted : 03 May 2006 12:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Tom, I'll be sending you a request by e-mail in a moment. In the meantime another, sometimes quite startling calculation, is to take the "average" cost of a "normal" LTI and then the NET profit on each of whatever widgets the company is manufacturing. (if it is a production industry) or of an hour of work if it is a service industry. Then calculate how many widgets or hours-of-work are required just to break even on ONE LTI. I work with a company that makes 2 500 cars a day. 0.8 cars per minute on each of two production lines. A "normal" accident can shut a line for maybe 30 minutes. That means the net profit from 24 cars is "lost". (plus all the other direct and indirect costs) Numbers like that tend to concentrate management minds on prevention of accidents. A "normal" accident. One that causes no more than up to a few days or weeks of lost time. Specifically excludes short term or permanent disabling or fatal injuries. Merv
Admin  
#14 Posted : 05 May 2006 09:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tom Doyle The accident cost calculation tool has been sent to those who have requested a copy. Cheers, Tom Doyle Industrial Safety Integration
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.