Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 May 2006 09:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By lewes
Under the DSE Regs we are required to pay for eye tests and for special corrective appliances, where applicable.

I understand the element towards the test but need clarification on the corrective appliances bit.

How can you determine that corrective appliances are required because of DSE work and not just through the person getting older or any out of work acivity ???

Does the company have to pay for the whole cost ??

What happens if the person is Long Sighted and needs glasses for close work anyway, does the company have to pay all costs or just an element ???

Thanks for any input
Admin  
#2 Posted : 05 May 2006 11:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve B
Lewes,
in a nutshell, you cant. If a person requires corrective appliances for DSE work then you must supply them. however I have found that 9 times out of 10 people will pay for the frames because of vanity, especially if they want to use them for other things. we supply corrective appliances but the frames are pretty basic.

regards
Steve B
Admin  
#3 Posted : 05 May 2006 11:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Descarte
since no one else has posted I will give you my experiences with my past employers, eye tests are free, and a variable amount (differing with employer) is paid towards glasses, this has ranged from 35 - £50. You can buy pairs of glasses from about £20 from boots but as people want various styles etc they can front extra money towards them

If the glasses required for close up VDU work are also required to be protective / safety lenses then this would count as PPE and the employer would have to front up the whole cost
Admin  
#4 Posted : 05 May 2006 11:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett
This topic was discussed extensively on this Forum a few weeks ago; perhaps a search and read would save much in the way of repetition?

HSWA S9 absolutely precludes the ley of any kind of charge on the employee for the provision of anything required to be provided in order to comply with any H&S requirement - therefore, the only charge that may be levied in regard to the provision of corrective appliances for DSE can only be for whatever the end user decides to add to the basic functional equipment. All other costs will have to be borne by the employer!

Frank Hallett
Admin  
#5 Posted : 05 May 2006 11:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By renown
Lewes

Have emailed you direct, hope this is helpful

Renown
Admin  
#6 Posted : 05 May 2006 12:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derrick Robinson
My understanding is that you are required to provide corrective appliances only when these are required solely and specifically VDU work.
You might find it usefull to talk to Specsavers corporate 02380 626900 who do a really good voucher system which covers both the mandatory eye test requirement and the provission of specs when required.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 05 May 2006 12:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Herbert
Can anyone tell me if contact lenses are corrective appliances in the terms of the regulations
Admin  
#8 Posted : 05 May 2006 13:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By anon1234
We rely on the optician to determine whether the corrective appliances are for DSE work alone - if they are we foot the bill. If they the individual needs glasses anyway and there is no additional expennse required for DSE activity we only pay for the test. If they require some additional feature over and above their normal glasses because of DSE we pay the difference - but we leave these classifications to the 'competent' person i.e. the optician.

Contact lenses? I guess in theory these could be the solution but I suspect they would be more expensive than basic glasses - so we would go down the basic glasses route unless there was a very sound reason for doing anything different - and this does not include vanity.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 05 May 2006 13:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
Start

1 Is the person a 'User' of DSE if not NO OBLIGATION - User is a person who 'habitually' uses DSE as part of their normal working day. 20 mins a day is NOT DSE use. More than 50% use then they are users.(Debatable!)

2 If a 'user of DSE' and you are approached for eye sight test, first question 'are you suffering any problems?' answer "NO!" why do a test!

3. If answer is yes and a 'user' the employer pays for DSE eyesight test.

4 Send to optician who decides if 'corrective lenses' are required "for working with DSE"! if 'Yes!' Employer pays - however only liable for basic cost - if Gucci required then employee has to pay the difference.

5. same goes for contacts - basic cost of glasses and employee pays the differnence for contacts (only once though if using disposables) Optician will (SHOULD) recommend date for retest
Admin  
#10 Posted : 05 May 2006 13:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Dave,

And excellent summary with the exception of point 2; Reg 5 says

'Where a person –

(a) is a user in the undertaking in which he is employed; or


(b) is to become a user in an undertaking in which he is, or is to become, employed,


the employer who carries on the undertaking shall, if requested by that person, ensure that an appropriate eye and eyesight test is carried out on him ';

so it isn't a question of whether there is problem or not, the user is entitled to a test, and I don't think the employer has any discretion. We could get sniffy about 'appropriate (i.e. there's no problem so no test is 'appropriate') but I don't see appropriate as meaning anything other than a test carried out by a competent person designed to establish whether there is a problem in the sense of Reg 5,

John
Admin  
#11 Posted : 05 May 2006 14:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker
Reminds me of an amusing experience .......and being friday afternoon.

It was once my misfortune to work for a company from the land of the rising sun.

Our MD was so incensed at the thought of having to pay for specs he proposed that they be attached to the PC via a chain so the employer could not take them home to use outside of work.

Took us ages to convince him this was a little unreasonable
Admin  
#12 Posted : 05 May 2006 14:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker
Employee I meant!!

Bit quick on the "post" button
Admin  
#13 Posted : 05 May 2006 14:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
Agree,

However if all employees who are 'users' want an eyesight test ( which they legally can!) it will cost zillions and just to go for one 'for the sake of it' is not really in the spirit of things. I still say if after a discussion they still want one then do it, however if you can head em off at the past then I would.


We had a free test and classed everyone as a user irrespective, that said the take up rate was very very low and the need for corrctive lenses after this was only a small % of that.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 05 May 2006 15:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
I see the sense in that, trying to head them off at the pass is reasonable. We too have an all inclusive scheme, but with about 200 or so DSE users we can't have had more than half a dozen requests in the last year,

John
Admin  
#15 Posted : 05 May 2006 15:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Merv,

Very true, and worth reflecting on, but that's up to the patient at the end of the day,

John
Admin  
#16 Posted : 05 May 2006 15:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Note to anybodyb who's read this far; my previous post is on the wrong thread (I can only blame the fact that its Friday and hot); it should be on the Glaucoma line, ooops,

John
Admin  
#17 Posted : 05 May 2006 15:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
John,

I think you posted to the wrong thread. No problems.

Contact lenses are ok in an office environment but not when any kind of chemical exposure may be concerned.

And first aiders should always be informed by people wearing contact lenses.

I had my first (safety) glasses paid by my employer in 1967 (!) (who among you were not even born then ?)

Got the job. First day - interview with department manager. Interview with safety manager. Safety shoes from the stores. Ouch. Appointment with local optician. Who confirmed that I needed prescription lenses. (Wot, me ? At my age ?) Back on site. Told to collect glasses the next morning before coming to work.

Tuesday ? Safety glasses, safety shoes, spiffing white lab coat. Suitably indoctrinated. Ready for work ! At about £50 a month, I think. Riches for a newly married.

And I've never ever paid for a pair of glasses. Used to drill out the rivets so as to remove the sideshields before going home. Now have CE glasses with clip-on sideshields. (wearing them now)

Nostalgia. It ain't what it used to be. But then again, I don't suppose it ever was. (George Orwell ? nah)

Merv
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.