Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 May 2006 14:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Durkin Hi, I have no wish to re-invent the hose reel, but this building we have taken over has them.Most buildings,we have occupied in recent times(8 years) have either not had them or had them taken out.I presume they were present in high risk buildings(large schools) or buildings where 9L water extinguishers were insufficient.I intend to get some advice from the local fire safety office, but am I on 'safe' grounds to suggest that modern extinguishers with additives etc. are a better prospect than reels that are 'only' ever reeled out when tested(stagnant water/training etc)? Regards,Paul
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 May 2006 15:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Al.. Hose reels are slow to deploy compared with extinguishers and more difficult to maintain. If the fire cannot be extinguished with a 6 litre foam extinguisher then it should be left to the fire service. The unlimited supply of water which hose reels provide could result in those using them remaining in the building too long trying to extinguish a fire which is beyond their capabilities. I suggest that hose reels should not be installed in new builds. In existing buildings I suggest that you should supplement the hose reels with foam extinguishers and consider removing the hose reels when you have the opportunity. Al
Admin  
#3 Posted : 23 May 2006 15:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Hoskins Paul, We removed our hose reels, on safety grounds, but not fire safety. It was considered that they might constitute a hazard with respect to Legionella due to the considerable length of dead-leg pipework. alan
Admin  
#4 Posted : 23 May 2006 16:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steven We too have had ours removed and like Alan it was the Legionella aspect that we looked at. We replaced the hoses with the correct amount of fire extinguishers as adviced by the company we use to supply and maintain extinguishers; and they have said that they are dealing with a lot of companies that are removing fire hoses at present. So I would suggest that fire hoses are definatley on the way out but would suggest that your risk assessment should identify whether hoses are a good form of extinguishing fires or a hazard – water/electricity/training/legionnaires etc Steve
Admin  
#5 Posted : 24 May 2006 00:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever By all means remove the hose reels but make sure you go through the proper process first. If the building is in London it may be that it falls under Section 20 of the London Building Act which requires hose reels to be installed in certain types of buildings. Other authorities may have similar rules/regulations. It may also be a requirement of the fire certificate which is still enforceable at the moment. You need to run it past building control and the fire authority. Normally they will not object to their removal but they may insist on seeing your fire risk assessment first.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 24 May 2006 09:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Durkin Hi All, Thanks all for your sensible advice.We as advised will do our FRA recommending hose reel removal amongst other things & then call in our local FSO to review/accept!!! our proposals.Yes this building does have a fire cert(when we can find it !!!)The fire hose we may have to accept is the one in the underground car park !!! Regards,Paul
Admin  
#7 Posted : 24 May 2006 10:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JAI Please Can someone point me to the relevant place were it mentions removing fire hoses? we have a very large site with around 85 hose reels to consider Jai
Admin  
#8 Posted : 24 May 2006 18:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever Jai You won't find anywhere that says to remove hose reels. This is a decision you have to make yourself then justify your reasons/demonstrate that you have suitable alternatives via a fire risk assessment. It is not hard to justify your reasons e.g. hose reels trailed through fire door openings preventing doors from shutting, longer to run out, people exposing themselves to fires larger than they ought, people delaying their escape trying to fight fire with unlimited water supply etc.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 24 May 2006 22:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By hsjb In relation to legionella and hose reels, I agree there is a legionella risk during servicing etc. however, a 9L water extinguisher left to stagnate for a year and then operated in an emergency or 'fun' can release an aerosol thus create a legionella risk. IMO and experience extinguishers are operated more readily in emergency and a hose reel is used to wash the company cars or hose down the yard on a Saturday morning - should we as 'enforcers' complain/restrict this or consider it a control measures as the water supply is being turned over in at least some of the outlets? John
Admin  
#10 Posted : 25 May 2006 08:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col In respect to legionella and fire hose reels. Legionella may proliferate within the fire hose reel and as such can present a danger. When you look at the dangers from fire and legionella then fire is a bigger risk. I look after a lot of hotels and council properties in respect to legionella. When we identify a risk from a fire hose reel we always contact the fire brigade and ask if they wish the hose reel to be removed. In some cases the fire hoses have been removed, but if the fire brigade cannot get their hoses to certain parts of a building then the fir ehoses stay in place. All fire hose reels have double check valves fitted in order that any loss in water pressure does not mean that the hoses back fill the main supply and thus contaminating the rest of the property. Risks and hazards have to be assessed on each individual property and as legionella only presents a danger during operation of the fire hoses and the fire hoses should only be used in an emergency and by trained personnel then then risk of legionella is a lower catagory to fire. Many people do discharge hoses annually and this should be taken into account on an assessment.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.