Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 26 May 2006 10:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ruth Doyle
The subject of Jeremy Clarkson is rarely far from practitioners’ minds. His continued heated attacks on health and safety feel like a personal attack to some, a background irritant to others. Love him or hate him, he’s impossible to ignore.

The question I am constantly asked is what is IOSH doing to stop him and others like him?

The answer is not a simple one. There are two ways in which our media relations strategy will ultimately help to balance or lessen the impact of this kind of negative media coverage.

First, IOSH vehemently rebuts every negative media story we see or hear about, usually within hours, and often thanks to the beady eyes of members! This has resulted in IOSH President Neil Budworth appearing on the Today Programme, and our letters have been published in all the major broadsheets. It’s also starting to result in IOSH being approached for balancing comment when potentially negative stories are being written.

Second, we’re starting to build annual national-level campaigns on positive issues. Last year, it was Chartered status and the membership changes. This year, our main focus has been young people, and wiseup2work. By showing that health and safety can be a positive aspect of life, we will gradually start to get a more balanced debate in the media.

Our efforts are starting to pay off – this year, we achieved a 400% increase in local and regional press and a 60% increase in trade sector press. Our main target for the next year is nationals and broadcast media, where we’re starting to get IOSH on the radar. There is certainly much to do, and much is already being done.

However, we must remember that Clarkson and others make a career out of being controversial. If he didn’t talk about health and safety (or environmental issues, big cars/machines, etc. etc.) then he wouldn’t make a living. He will never write a positive piece about health and safety, because being negative about it is one of his biggest sources of income.

Clarkson is just as unlikely to ever agree to a debate with health and safety professionals, but other detractors have been more approachable. We recently had success at a local level, when columnist and health and safety detractor Geoff Hill was challenged to an IOSH arranged debate, resulting in a very positive health and safety piece in the Belfast Newsletter.

The battle against tabloid journalism might never be won, but what IOSH can do is counter negative media comment with robust rebuttals, positive campaigns, and by starting to develop good relationships with journalists.

It is only through our positive, proactive campaigning that the health and safety message will really get through.

Ruth Doyle, IOSH Director of Communications.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 26 May 2006 11:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
Ruth,

thankyou for that. And a recipe for roast pigeon with juniper berries will be on it's way just as soon as my MIODE certificate arrives.

Merv
Admin  
#3 Posted : 26 May 2006 11:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By George Wedgwood
I had to laugh the other night when Jeremy 'set fire to his hair' when welding up the back of that awful converted 4x4 he was working on to make it amphibious! What a mess and his results (as were the results of his co-presenters) were a disgrace to his own profession of mechanical engineers. However, it was fun to watch! And I think that is the point - health and safety does not appear to most as being fun (mind you neither does the work of a solicitor!) and if we want to lift it a bit more we need to make some of appear fun. So what about some funny anecdotes then?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 26 May 2006 11:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By M Barnett
Ruth,
I liked your thread about 'The Mouth' Clarkson.

I think that in addition to being controversial and insulting, this man shows his ignorance of health & safety (I could say more but will probably be censored).

Perhaps an Interview could be arranged between Neil Budworth and 'The Mouth' now that would make interesting television!

Hope everyone has a good bank holiday weekend.

Mark
Admin  
#5 Posted : 26 May 2006 11:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt
Ruth

I like Jeremy Clarkson. I never miss Top Gear. I tend not to read the papers as I don't have the time, so miss the negative press that I hear reportedly written by him and his journalist colleagues.

From watching the man I can see he has a love for engineering and how that innovative heritage in the UK had an effect on the world. I too share that love of science and engineering.

He has admitted that he does not really understand the oily bits that well, so he communicated "how it felt" to drive a certain car with some very amusing similie. Compare that with the more technical reviews and it is easy to see who the entertainer is.

He engages people on an emotional level. In my honest opinion IOSH must endeavor to engage with people on an equally strong emotional level as well as on an intellectual level.

Failing that Jeremy Clarkson's episode of "Who do you think you are?" is being repeated on BBC 3 this week where we see him standing in a glass factory wearing Bump hat, ear defenders and goggles. Do a postcard of this with the legend "Safety Hero" on it Pre addressed to Richard Hammond and James May at the BBC, pop it in the next issue of SHP and we all send one in to Top Gear.

He'll not open his gob for weeks.

Right I'm away for some spuds.

Jeff FMIODE.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 26 May 2006 12:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Janette Draper
I almost wet myself laughing actually.

Have you thought that perhaps he may go on so much about it because he may be surrounded by those safety "professionals" that think they are not doing a good job unless they are spouting "Risk Assessment blah blah", "safe systems of work blah” and my personal favourite "the law says you must blah blah and more blah" and lets face it, there are a lot of those safety people out there.

Personally, I try not to get up high on the legal horse to put the safety message across. My guys all know I’m qualified or I wouldn’t have been employed in the role I’m in; likewise they know I have the experience to draw on – that much is evident when we get into discussions about why we do things in a certain manner / wear certain equipment / keep certain records etc so my point is that it doesn’t have to be all fights, mental stress and no fun to do it safely. That is of course my own personal opinion and I don’t want to be hung, drawn and quartered at dawn because of it!

Lets find out who is the safety bod for the BBC!!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 26 May 2006 12:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Debbie S
Yes, the man rants about Health & Safety (who doesn't because it makes for lively discussion) but flip the coin over......he would no more drive a car on the public road if it was not roadworthy and the cars that he drives are fitted out with state of the art traction control (he raved about this on the Mazda RX8,) anti roll, ABS Brakes, air bags etc etc that he promotes safety, albeit in a different way
Admin  
#8 Posted : 26 May 2006 12:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Aidan Toner
Hello Ruth
Glad you thought of us here in the N.Ireland banch.Yes, on a social,informative and entertainment basis we engaged a Clarkson type jounalist in a public debate. (He has motorbiked through some far east desert type locations and may presently be motorbiking the full length of the Andes in S.America.Unlike Clarkson this guy can fix his bike without help of AA/RAC.)--- The debating topic was 'Health And Safety Will Be the Death Of Us All'. Our local journalist came away from the debate with the opinion that Health and Safety may continue to be a subject taken to excesses by the great unwashed BUT NOT BY THE H/S PROFESSIONAL. An important distinction we felt was made.I go along with Ruth on this,we should all be working to present ourselves as Risk Advisors and Risk Managers who still have a sense of fun and adventure.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 26 May 2006 12:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker
I think Jeremy has done our profession a tremendous service over the past few years.
He has acted as a figurehead of how the man in the street view us, and as a result we have cleaned up our act enormously.

We all know the old H&S bloke with his clipboard & posters & rules - fortunately he is a dying breed. IOSH shouild leave Jez alone and get on with burnishing the reputation of the true professional
Admin  
#10 Posted : 26 May 2006 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister
To Ruth, why not take up Jeff's suggestion regarding Clarkson as "Safety Hero" and produce a range of similar postcards? In fact the entire cast of Grumpy Old Men would be useful models. Assorted Royals and high-profile politicians could add to the fun.

Glad I've found the Friday thread!

Have a great weekend
Admin  
#11 Posted : 26 May 2006 15:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
He would be on my cool wall as a very coool presenter Paxman would be far and away down the uncoool section. If you cant have a laugh, apparently there has been a spate of foaming and clingfilming GATSO's recently after he was on with Gordon Ramsay, which I would not condone at all.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 26 May 2006 15:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
Dave,

What ? Could you explain the bit from "foaming" ?

Merv (only one glass at lunchtime. Honest)
Admin  
#13 Posted : 26 May 2006 15:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Cartridge
Dave


We could always offer to clingfilm & foam old dangermouth free of charge.



Andy
Admin  
#14 Posted : 26 May 2006 15:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary C
Why not try to arrange for some H&S professionals to participate in the Top Gear prog (you know the bit where various individuals from certain groups race against each other). I'm sure there must be some pretty acomplished drivers within our ranks. Maybe we can show him that taking controlled risks is ok.



Admin  
#15 Posted : 26 May 2006 15:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
Apparently if you insert a can of expanding foam etc illegal and not recommended
Admin  
#16 Posted : 26 May 2006 16:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Linda Crossland-Clarke
Hi

I did email jezza and Top Gear some while ago, but no response I'm afraid.

Linda
Admin  
#17 Posted : 26 May 2006 16:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary Clarkson
I will drop him an internal mail see what kind of reaction it produces. Who knows, he does seem like a guy with a huge sense of fun.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 26 May 2006 16:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt
Linda

What did you say/ask?

Jeff
Admin  
#19 Posted : 26 May 2006 16:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Beth Kendrick
I am loving the postcard idea. Brilliant!

Having said that, I also like Clarkson. He's highly entertaining (especially when he loses the Top Gear challenges), even if you don't agree with his views on Health and Safety, the environment, speed limits... (to name but a few).

Also anything or anyone that brings Health and Safety into the public arena in a high profile way that engenders debate is, in my opinion, a good thing. Even if they are wrong.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 26 May 2006 16:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt
Beth

No such thing as bad publicity. You could have a point.

I think the postcard is the way to go ( funny that)

Jeff
Admin  
#21 Posted : 26 May 2006 16:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
Linda,

Wasn't that to ask about the H & S Calender?!!

Take care!
Admin  
#22 Posted : 26 May 2006 18:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stephen Clark
I recently bought www.clarksonintights.com so that i can present some interesting pics of the curly haired tall one to the world. It will include as many pics of him wearing safety gear as possible plus a number that will remind the world of the moptop from his earlier years. The purpose of the site will be to promote safety with humour and use the immense talents of our Mr Clarkson to assist us. I'm having fun putting it together!
Contributions are welcome, but remember there will be nothing libellous. My ultimate goal... Clarkson makes the world safer!!!
Send anything suitable to thecurlyone@clarksonintights.com
Admin  
#23 Posted : 26 May 2006 18:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney
Jezza is an entertainer; he does just that.

Chazza
Admin  
#24 Posted : 28 May 2006 09:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC
and here he is again getting all this publicity.
Admin  
#25 Posted : 30 May 2006 08:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stupendous Man
A good cross-section of postings here - I have corresponded with Jeremy a few times over the years and have always found him to be a civil chap.

As many have pointed out, he is a journalist and makes his living by having a 'Friday rant' about any subject that comes to mind. Lets face it, accuracy and journalism have never been easy bed-fellows and there must be countless other professions who are livid about the inaccurate reporting of matters relating to 'their' industry.

I like the idea of the postcard with Jezza wearing all manner of PPE - but expect this to be turned into another article in the 'elf n safety vein.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 30 May 2006 12:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philosophical
When I have a pimple on a part of my anatomy I would rather not speak of I ignore it in the sure and certain knowledge it will go away. Perhaps he is simply a pimple on IOSH's anatomy and it would be better to treat him in a similar vein.

Surely the best way of countering this is by those in the profession becoming more professional. While people continue to bite at the remarks it only provides credibility to his arguments and money to his bank account. Who is the foolish one here?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.