Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 May 2006 15:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap Can anybody point me in the right direction for a copy of the Bradford city Fire vidoe? I'm hoping to do a fire presentation and would like to show how quick and dangerous fire can be.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 30 May 2006 16:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ME I saw it again recently and in my opinion it is too distressing to show on a general basis. There is a difference between letting people know what can happen and causing distress to people in the name of eduaction. There are plently of other training videos on fire.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 May 2006 16:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap Well thanks for your opinion. In my opinion it is the shock tactics that i require. And this will do the trick in making people take note of how devastating fire can be if they dont play by the rules.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 30 May 2006 16:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Morrison Have to agree, sometimes shock tactics are whats needed and this video is very effective. I know for sure people having seen this pay far more attention to fire awareness training,and issues relating to fire safety. Bill
Admin  
#5 Posted : 30 May 2006 16:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham If it's shock taktick avoid it it's too dated, i used to use it but the hairdoo's and bad football get too many laughs before the fire action occurs even when the old man walks out the stand on fire in general you get laughs when from the comintators comments and when to old guy get's jumped on and his flames fanned rather than smothered buy those trying to help him. I don't like using it because the response to it is too mixed there must be better videos than that
Admin  
#6 Posted : 30 May 2006 17:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gerry Newton The West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service have a video library which contains videos with some footage of the Bradford Fire edited to a more reasonable level. I don't have access to teh library at the moment as I am working away from home, but if you cannot gat any joy locating it yourself get back to me and I will see what I can find for you.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 31 May 2006 10:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ME I'm disgusted that people would laugh at a man on fire. People died that day. I can't believe that some of you want to show people dying and being maimed for life as a shock tactic. Have you ever been in a burns unit and interviewed someone with severe burns in the hope that you can question them before infection sets in and they die? I have. You have no idea. All in the name of health and safety? There are some things people are better off not knowing.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 31 May 2006 11:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Darren Collinswood I have to agree, having had to research a number of such incidents to gain a qualification in disaster management, I am bewildered that anyone should have the need to use such a video in the name of health & safety. Unless you are training football stewards I cannot see the more general relevance. As already said there are many good fire videos out there that can be very effective and of relevance to the modern workplace. After all who actually works in a wooden football stand with a few thousand people stood next to them?
Admin  
#9 Posted : 31 May 2006 11:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Watson Try Granada TV, I think they now own the rights, buy they are very careful over who is allowed to use the footage and in what context, quite rightly given the sensitive nature of the topic. As to others laughing at the footage.... sick people. Ask them if they laugh at motorway accidents. Regards John
Admin  
#10 Posted : 31 May 2006 11:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AlB One of the most hard-hitting and truly eye-opening fire safety films I have ever come accross was one entitled something like "Remember Charlie". It is the story of a guy called Charlie who used to work for Exxon I think (my apologies to the Exxon legal dapartment if I'm incorrect). The film is that of Charlie reciting the scenario to a group of people. It is moving, shocking and really packs a punch. It does not show people dying. It is not graphic. But it is excellent. I don't know where you can get a copy, but I will look around.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 31 May 2006 11:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Beau Bridges I agree with certain elements of both sides of the argument regarding showing this video. However i have to admit that i am of the opinion that the video is an excellent training tool, and in my experiance very effective. I think the benefits of showing this video at the right time in training pays dividends. Yes the video is distressing, and yes i felt uneasy whatching it, but the shear shock factor of the video has focused my mind on fire safety, if its focused my mind, it might focus others. It is not nice to see someone horifically burned, and i think thats the point with showing the video. If just one person takes more care over fire safety from seeing the video then it is worth it. If people can appreciate how horrific the injuries fire can be, to such an extent it is almost tangable, then they can appreciate the dangers of fire better. The video demonstrates the speed at which fire can spread, whether it be in a stadium, or not; it is this spead of growth that often catches people un'awares. If you have seen the video you will appreciate how slow the supporters move in copmparison to the fire, and why unfortunatly so many suffered as a result of the fire (ok i appreciate the exits being locked laregly contributed to this) In a long winded way what i'm trying to say is show the video, the benefits far outweigh the negatives in my opinion
Admin  
#12 Posted : 31 May 2006 11:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker Having recently watched the film yes it is graphic but it does gives an excellent demonstration of just how rapidly a seemingly small fire can spread into a disaster plus the effect of flashover,radiant heat and crowd panic. It may be old but its still relevant. Andy
Admin  
#13 Posted : 31 May 2006 12:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Amy Upton I also use the Bradford fire as a training video and whilst some of you may think that it is shocking and out dated it is very relevant. I find it disturbing but to get the shock effect over to those who think it will never happen to them then this is needed and to those that laugh they are just sick. It shows how fast a fire can travel and the devestation a fire can cause. I am all for the use of this video/dvd. I always ensure that I inform people that it is graffic and can be upsetting but that the message is real. As previously stated it gets the message across and I'm sure that the fire authority would rather us use media that gets the message across than go around the houses. I see no one complaining of how graphic drink driving adverts can be, these are far more distressing and get the relevant message across.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 31 May 2006 12:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert Jackson I have footage of the Rhode Island nightclub fire which I use in fire training, it doesnt show anything graphic like the bradford footage but shows clearly how crowds react in an emergency, this case a very fast spreading fire caused by pyros. I found this hit harder than sitting people down to show them the bradford fire which I agree is now dated, having worked for the emergency services I saw the fire brigade footage which was horrendous compared to the TV picture footage So I would be very careful in selecting exactly what to show during presentations Rj
Admin  
#15 Posted : 31 May 2006 12:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Diane Thomason Agree about selecting video footage carefully. gham's audience would seem to be too immature to understand the message from the Bradford vid (no reflection on you gham!). I saw this vid as part of training given by the fire service - the message about rapid development of fire + inappropriate response by some individuals really hit home, and nobody in our training room laughed - no way. So not suitable for all audiences but very useful for others. I am glad I saw it even though it's awful - because of the lessons I learned. If you do use it you could maybe show clips or stills instead of the whole thing, e.g. to show the timeline or individual actions.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 31 May 2006 15:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By s mac Our local fire authority have been very helpful in delivering general fire awareness training to staff. A short video which they used, was a real life incident in a well known chain of off-licences, in which a small fire developed near the entrance of the shop. This demonstrated the 'human factor' element, of customers still entering the shop, walking past the fire etc and the employee who was busy at the till serving and did not become aware of the fire until it had escalated. Perhaps your local fire authority may recommend suitable material for training sessions? Good luck in your search.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 31 May 2006 15:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Simpletom I have a copy I am in London
Admin  
#18 Posted : 31 May 2006 15:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap Can you mail me please simpleton
Admin  
#19 Posted : 01 June 2006 09:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham They don't laugh at the people involved it's more the Hair Cuts, Tight shorts and comentary that causes it, it detracts from the actual point of the video, it would be more appropriate if the comentary was taken out of the film. To be fair it's probably more nervous laughter than finding the film comical in anyway.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 01 June 2006 11:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Simpletom Will do
Admin  
#21 Posted : 02 June 2006 10:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bryan Andrew Sheldon I have been a part time fire man and into Health and Safety training for about 17 years. Yes it does shock. If you let the session know what to expect and give squimish person the options to opt out the messgae is the same. Most of the training that staff get is boring. Make it mean something. How many times on practice evacuations do you hear "o its only a practice what a waste of time". Let staff feel the pain of losing some one and feel some of the pain that the families feel after such events. It may focus the mind. Not on every one but it may get through to some. And save lives. I have lost my copy. (lent it to some one who says they gave it back to me) any one have a copy or know where I can get it. It originally came from the BBC. But they say they no longer do it? Let me know please BAS
Admin  
#22 Posted : 02 June 2006 10:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keithy There is a very good one available centred around the Pipa Alpha Oil Rig fire, I think it was a National Geographic production. Not so graphic but very good with regard to the spread of flame, smoke, timings, lack of action on warning alarms, evacuation routes being bloked and conclusions. Very interesting and might hold your students attention because it's different.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 02 June 2006 10:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Blaise The 'Remember Charlie' film is excellent, very compelling to watch and very thought provoking. It feature Charlie Morecraft who worked for Exxon and had a serious accident doing a routine task. It really does bring home the risk of fire, not wearing PPE correctly and the danger of becoming complacent. The video is available through his own website www.charliemorecraft.com He set up his own safety company and does speaking tours all over the USA. Blaise. (A Danger Man in the making)
Admin  
#24 Posted : 02 June 2006 12:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chrisinwood Well having read all the threads what a diverse response. All major airports in the UK either have used or still do use this video. Heathrow/Gatwick certainly use to. I would suggest that the video can be used depending on the type of business/persons you are trying to get the message accross to. As to the rights and wrongs of showing the video, and peoples reactions to it, yes some people will make jokes about it.....sadly the world is not full of 'nice' people ..thats life im afraid. The man did die, again very sad, for comments to be made like, 'in the interest of health & safety, people are better off not knowing etc etc' im amazed. These videos arent shown for fun, yes as a shock tactic and why not, if it works and is applicable to your work, i say use it. Silly remarks which are intended to make us ghouls beacuse we want to shock people into realising that fire is dangerous and can kill people and children very quickly should be ignored. Over the years i have attended many road traffic accidents, sadly most being fatalities, pictures taken as evidence have later been used as shock tactics to people who believe that speeding wont kill you, were they upset? Yes a bit, did it work, perhaps half of them. was it worth it? YES Maybe one day we will achieve a culture where we dont have to resort to these types of videos, and everyone is at peace with each other, and the world is a perfect place?
Admin  
#25 Posted : 02 June 2006 12:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ME I don't appreciate my comments being twisted. Of course people should know the dangers of fire and that ultimately lives are at stake. What I said was that people are better off not seeing the gory details. For the record, it has not been unheard of for a video to be shown only to find out that someone in the audience actually knew that person that was killed or injured, or was there. See the wreckage, yes. See the destruction, yes. But see the dead body, no. I guess you must be the type of person who rubbernecks at road accidents. Me. I've seen enough dead bodies in my life and I wish I'd never even seen one.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 02 June 2006 13:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Amy Upton Talk about 'Bonkers Conkers' come on folks we are here to promote Health & Safety. Using this video/DVD wether rightly or wrongly (in others eyes) may help promote safety where other available media has failed.
Admin  
#27 Posted : 02 June 2006 16:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DJ Toecap and others, I have used a film made by one of the Building/Fire Research Establishment, which is also a bit dated now. The film shows a domestic room fire which from start to finish (by that I mean room totally destroyed) is about 3 minutes. Not only is the film very graphic, which gets the message across, there is a timer in the corner and more importantly, as it is a simulation, nobody died. I think it is a great training video. Regards. DJ
Admin  
#28 Posted : 02 June 2006 17:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman OK. I've seen all of the films mentioned above. I prefer the building research one. It shows, quite dramatically, the SPEED of development of a fire. That, in it's self is a real shocker especially if you count out loud the seconds. The piper alfa one is pretty good but is not really real everyday life. people don't relate to it. Its the sort of stuff you see on telly : people having a tough time thousands of miles away (definition of "adventure") The one in the night club is ok. The audience can maybe understand that you shouldn't always follow the crowd. Bradford ? Never. The first time I saw that film I nearly vomited. Company policy (which I make) is that in our trainings we will never show an injured or distressed person (and never, ever a child) or a body. There are many better ways of getting the message across. Cordially Merv
Admin  
#29 Posted : 04 June 2006 12:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chrisinwood I dont think you are going to get am easy answer to your question! I totally agree with the comment made that we are here to promote safety. Although its a bit obvious, I can only think that you can watch the videos that have been listed on the forum and make a decision based upon the audience you are trying to capture and what you believe is the best way forward to get the message accross. If you still have any doubt, consider the article in last months SHP (15 mins of a victim) where they wrong to show horific pics or did it help get the message accross. Good luck with your decision, oh and for the record regarding rubber neckers, no i was a Traffic Police Officer and therefore would never condone such an action.
Admin  
#30 Posted : 05 June 2006 08:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap Good morning peeps.Well anyway folks a very good debate. I'm glad to see some good support and some good items to consider. Now bback to the original question. Has anybody got a copy? can those with alternative vids mail me with details please. I dont think the Pippa Alpha vid is the right tool.
Admin  
#31 Posted : 05 June 2006 09:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh Nobody seems to be considering the feelings of the families of victims and the victims themselves. Seeing this video shown again and again may cause problems. I reccomend the "Remember Charlie" video (by Charlie Morecraft). I have seen this so many times, and have even seen Charlie do the live gig. No matter how many times I see it, it remains powerful, and is about much more than just fire - it's about taking responsibility for you own actions and your own safety. It is not cheap but is excellent.
Admin  
#32 Posted : 05 June 2006 09:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By wickedmick I have some details about where you can get a 10 min version of this video which plays on windows media player. michaelandeleanor@f2s.com
Admin  
#33 Posted : 05 June 2006 09:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC Remember Charlie - Never seen the video or the live show, but I have looked at the site and the costs of the video. I must say for someone 'Charlie' who wants to promote H&S the costs are a bit on the high side and sold typical USA style. Don't think I'll be a customer.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.