Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 01 June 2006 10:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Adam Has anyone come across this situation. We use a powdercoat paint process and the operators have access to mobile phones when in the spray boothes and painting. Q - is this legal and is it safe? Hope some one can help
Admin  
#2 Posted : 01 June 2006 11:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JEFFREY SMITH I suppose it would depend largely a) on the size of the booth b) on any PPE the sprayers are wearing and c) how can they use mobiles when they are spraying? I would suggest that, even if not unlawful, that this is not best practice. What is their reason for using the phones in the booth? If a matter of 'elf & safety' then suggest a permanent emergency phone be installed. Good luck confused of corsham
Admin  
#3 Posted : 01 June 2006 11:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman I try to discourage, strongly, the carrying/using of portables in any factory situation. Exceptions allowed for supervisors and managers. They are just too distracting. Merv
Admin  
#4 Posted : 01 June 2006 11:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Helen Horton Having worked in the powder coating production industry for 12 years I think this is courting disaster. Anything that could produce a spark should be kept well out of the spray booth and well away from its vicinity due to the risk of dust explosion. Stop them NOW!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 01 June 2006 13:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Malcolm Fryer Andrew Apart from all the good advice you have had from other contributors I would suspect that your assessment under DSEAR may well have identified that there could be a risk of explosion in a spray booth. Mobile phones especially when they ring are not intrinsically safe so have no place in such an environment. Very simple action ban possession of phones in this environment. I hope that this assists. Malcolm
Admin  
#6 Posted : 01 June 2006 22:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC Your correct Malcolm - I would ban them completing and take disciplinary action against anyone using them in or near the spray booth. Instant dismissal. Don't mess about you may have been just lucky so far.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 02 June 2006 09:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick Oxley All sound advice, I understand the theory and take on board the good advice given out but has anyone come across documented evidence to show that mobile phones may cause sparks when in use.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 02 June 2006 12:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister This sounds just like the mobile phone/petrol forecourt argument that has been well-debated here in past postings. What is the likelihood/probability of a phone being used in an area where there is an explosive atmosphere and the phone causing a spark of sufficient intensity to initiate an explosion? When and where has this ever occurred, apart from in the minds of nutty Americans and over-cautious safety people? I think we need a danger expert to answer this! If anyone comes up with a real example I would be very interested to learn more. Have a great weekend.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 02 June 2006 12:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Just had another thought: do the sprayers need RPE? If so, how do they use the phone to talk?
Admin  
#10 Posted : 02 June 2006 13:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smurfer I understood that the concentration of dust in air needed to be at least 50-100g/m3 in order to be explosive (depending on the substance, particle size, etc.). To put this into perspective, that's 50,000mg/m3 compared with a typical occupational exposure limit of, let's say, 10mg/m3 (a factor of 5000x more than the OEL). If an individual was using a mobile phone in this dust concentration (without RPE) I would expect that neither the individual or his mobile phone would be functioning properly for very much longer.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 02 June 2006 13:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smurfer A reference for the 50-100g/m3 figure... for anyone who's interested. "http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/hsl_pdf/2004/hsl04-12.pdf" (section 3.2.1)
Admin  
#12 Posted : 02 June 2006 14:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Oliver Unbelievably, I came across some stereo speakers hard wired into a spray booth some time ago during an audit. I also have a video somehwere of a female member of the public catching fire at a petrol station as she uses her mobile whilst filling her car. Will have to have a dig around and see if I can find it.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 02 June 2006 14:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Oliver David, I am assuming you don't work within zones 0, 1 & 2 then?
Admin  
#14 Posted : 02 June 2006 18:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd The above link is for risks associated with nano-powders. Somewhat smaller than the powders used for coating.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 02 June 2006 23:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smurfer ... which makes the coating powder concentration even higher before being explosive (smaller surface area). do you have to explain the bleeding obvious every time you write something on this forum?... seems like it sometimes
Admin  
#16 Posted : 03 June 2006 06:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd I think I do; have to state the obvious that is. Especially when far too many of the threads seem to more along the lines of saving the companies cash, rather than health and safety. Especially since quantities of "nano" powders being produced are extremely small. It seemed, to me, that the link was not relevant. It still does seem so.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 03 June 2006 08:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smurfer John Just do a 'google' for 'dust explosion concentration' and you'll see other links which aren't to do with nano-powders quoting the same levels (50-100g/m3 upto 2-3kg/m3) e.g. http://www.chemeng.ed.ac...fluences/influences.html The setion in the nano-powders' reference is to do with the general characteristics of a dust explosion and not just relevant to nano-powders. My point is that if an operator is exposed to a dust cloud at explosive levels then he/she wouldn't be able to use a mobile phone, or even breathe. And it's got nothing to do with saving the company money.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 03 June 2006 10:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC Nano powders or whatever - Mobile phones are not as far as I know intrinsically safe. So ban them.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 03 June 2006 13:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd I already googled it, and I've done the job as well. If you're banning mobiles because they aren't "intrinsically safe", presumably you're also banning the charged gun that imparts the electric[al] charge to the powder ? Unless you operate the fluidised powder "dip" type coating process, in which case...does it matter ? Admit it, you're just on a downer because guys use phones while they're supposed to be working.....money again.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 03 June 2006 14:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smurfer We seem to agree then John. If you want to ban mobile phones you have to prove that there is a risk - I still remain unconvinced that there is. There's too much of this 'I don't like it so lets ban it' attitude amongst H&S people, and that's what gives us a bad name and gets up the noses of people like Clarkson.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 03 June 2006 18:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Al.. I would like to suggest that "ban" is a word that perhaps should not be in a safety practitioner's vocabulary. It creates, in my mind, an image of a somewhat officious jobsworth who is frustrating the organisation rather than facilitating improvements :-) And if we are to continue using the word, let's consider whether a safety practitioner should be banning anything. We give advice to line managers who will then decide what action should be taken. "Managers manage and advisers advise" I thing someone once said.
Admin  
#22 Posted : 04 June 2006 01:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By danny4928 Smurfer, How can we know if the dust concentration within the range of 50-100g/m3? What you mean by OEL and RPE? Thanks for the helps on the terms.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 04 June 2006 07:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd Yes, it seemed to me that banning phones because they may make a spark, while shoving powder out of the end of a "gun" charged to 20 Kv is a bit contradictory. Yes: OEL: Occupational Exposure Limit. Supposedly a limit above which the operator is not supposed to be exposed. Largely ignored, propped-up by extensive monitoring which is extensively repeated until the desired result is obtained. RPE: Respiratory Protective Equipment. The item of equipment [grudingly] provided by the employer to protect the employee from excessive dust/fume in the workplace. It being cheaper to buy a load of [cheap] masks than provide extraction, which is what they are SUPPOSED to do. Dust concentration (50mg/M3 etc) You need to hire a company to come along and test the levels over a period of time. They do this by using small air samplers that pull/push the air through filters. They then check the filters in the lab. Usually the testing is done when no work is being done, at night etc. All of the above are usually monitored by professional occupational health and safety consultants. Which says it all really !
Admin  
#24 Posted : 04 June 2006 11:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC To the car Salesman - Hey what that long streaky bit on my nice new car. Oh that what happened when the srpayer answered his wifes call to see what he would like for his dinner. Oh OK. and what that burning smell inside - Oh that's when it caught fire whilst he was on the phone. Oh OK.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.