Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 07 June 2006 11:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Russell Wilkinson I am currently working on a large MOD project,and for the first time ever I am having Risk Assessments rejected for not having enough detail.The reasons given being not information on control measures.We have been asked to provide information including what rooms we are working in,and each risk associated in each room (i have done this by building currently)along with who we will liaise with in each room.How long we will be in each room etc.But the same guy has asked us to remove the risks associated with confined spaces,connected with the civils because we have not started any excavation work on site yet,and only to produce a risk assessment when we have broken ground.Where's the logic?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 07 June 2006 11:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie If I have read you posting correctly I would question why you are submitting Risk Assessments to the Planning Supervisor. The adequacy, or otherwise of risk assessments for the construction activities on a project rest with the employer carrying out the work and the Principal Contractor.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 08 June 2006 16:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Beadle I act as a Planning Supervisor, some clients assign additional duties including reviewing and commenting on the adequacy of the contractors method statements/risk assessments.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 June 2006 17:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Salus Hi Russell, your risk assessments have to be "suitable & sufficient" and are required to identify the "significant" hazards.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 09 June 2006 08:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chrisinwood Its a bit of a tricky one to understand from your thread, if the issue lies around the content of the control measures please feel free to send a copy of one to me and I'll give you another opinion if that is of any help? Chris.Inwood@haymills.com
Admin  
#6 Posted : 09 June 2006 09:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis John A problem often occurs here when the client assigns the duty to the PS but does not have a clause in the contract for the PC to be aware of and accept it as a duty on themselves. Russell You need to check on your contract conditions to know how far you can take this. MOD work like that in prisons is often very specific in the needs of the method statement and it is indeed possible that seemingly identical tasks could hold different risks in different rooms. I remeber one job where there was a simple requirement to paint walls in cells, prisoners' common areas, and staff rest areas. All had different risks. As for the assessments to be faced later - this is the fairly standard thinking process based on a knowledge that there could be other changes tomorrow. Just keep them to one side or stamp them DRAFT at this moment. Bob
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.