Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 June 2006 16:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Holliday I have been asked to put together a short presentation on the title subject. Essentially, why do workers (in general) follow safe working practices at work but then disregard them at home. ie. An engineering guy would probably think nothing of wearing gloves, eye protection and probably overalls when using a hand held grinder at work having completed a risk assessment, but more than likely would at best only wear eye protection if using the same tool at home. Does anyone have any information, sources of information or presentation material that I can crib from? Any information would be gratefully received. Thanks in advance Steve
Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 June 2006 20:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bramall Mmmm - Steve, sounds like a minefield - more of a Phd than a short presentation. A few initial thoughts anyway. I dont believe that we are very safety concious. The lucky ones who are employed be responsible organisations are subject to regular compliance checks and therefore in line for a bit of disciplinary if found lacking in PPE, working practices etc. At home we dont have anyone checking up on us and therefore ignore the obvious safety rules - I know I have often been guilty of this to some degree, strimming, using a lawnmower etc. I dont tend to wear ear defenders, goggles, gloves and liners etc. to cut down on the noise and vibration. Possibly it's the idea that doing something full time poses greater hazards than a spare time activity - certainly true in terms of health effects, noise, vibration, manual handling etc, where the effect is a gradual build up. In the scenario you mention where instant damage may occur, we are probably more careful but still not 100%. That being said, however, we do from time to time see employees ( not in our own organisations of course) breaking every rule you can think of, so it is not a sweeping statement that in work we use controls and at home we dont. Probably not an answer but maybe a little food for thought. P.S. Having mentioned minefields earlier, a particular control of the hazards is recommended if you go there. Regards DrB
Admin  
#3 Posted : 16 June 2006 10:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Steve It is a very interesting observation but unfortunately I do not believe there are many simple answers. That said, risk is in part unique to the individual and also socially constructed. For example, people do what they do in a work environment because they have to or put another way, it is driven by enforcement. At home people are free to do as they choose - with often deleterious consequences. Therefore I would suggest it is not so much a 'cultural barrier', but rather, a legislation/rule barrier. Regards Ray
Admin  
#4 Posted : 16 June 2006 11:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Should have mentioned that you might like to check out various literature on Risk Perception. I do not have any references to hand but will check some out when I get a chance.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 16 June 2006 11:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Young This very subject is part of a new theme launched by RoSPA recently. Whilst commendable in the idea, I really think that this is a step too far. I understand the concept of it all and the potential benefits to absence from work but I really think that people must take responsibility for their own behaviour sometime and be allowed to make mistakes whatever the consequences. To me it smacks of a big brother attitude and one that Mr C would have a field day on. Sorry to be so contencious.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 16 June 2006 16:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter MacDonald I agree Ron. If I followed most site rules I would end up writing a risk assessment and hiring scaffold to change a light bulb in my own house. I'll just continue to stand on the chair thank you. Tool box talks on confined spaces before playing hide and seek with the kids. COSHH assessments required before consuming Kebabs. There is enough control freakery at work without it seeping into the home. Although I did mow the lawn in my flip flops last night which was just stupid.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 16 June 2006 17:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs Getting back to the original post, I don't know of any references, sorry. Looking at recent posts and personal experience, perhaps it has something to do with cost, time consumption and effort? Where does the kit come from? How much does it cost? Is it worth spending the time putting it on? etc. A few sparks might singe my jeans, but they're old ones ... (Not what you'd say if you knew the boss was paying out if you burn your 501's)
Admin  
#8 Posted : 17 June 2006 16:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman My last employer was Dupont. We actively measured on and off the job accident statistics, which were both posted at the plant entrance. The thrust was "Safety is for Life !" Monthly audit and tool-box themes were either alternated on/off or integrated. When I talked (talk still) about chemicals and coshh a standard question is "where do you keep the really really dangerous chemicals at home" Um. Are yours under the kitchen sink too ? Go look, please. We encouraged employees to take their safety shoes home with them. We gave out gloves and hard hats for DIY. No obligation to use them, but why not ? The works committee loaned out power tools to employees. They were all PAT tested. Husbands/wives of employees occasionally protested this "interference" in their family lives. And when we tried to send "family safety bulletins" to the homes they sometimes came back screwed into tinytiny balls. So, yes, there is a culture clash. But personally I am 100% for "off-the-job" safety. It's for life. Not just at work. 15 years since I left DP. and I still hold the handrail going up or down stairs. But Wednesday of this week I had to get down a bowl stored on top of the kitchen cabinets. Stood on a chair. Dindnt I ? Merv
Admin  
#9 Posted : 17 June 2006 21:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew1 In reply to Tabs comment "Husbands/wives of employees occasionally protested this "interference" in their family lives. And when we tried to send "family safety bulletins" to the homes they sometimes came back screwed into tinytiny balls". Isn't it strange how people protest positive safety culture like this around the home, but any apparent lack of it in the workplace is treated by the very same people with complete distain and intolerance. Is it not fair to assume that positive safety practice and culture around the home may be percieved by the majority as uncool and boring. Or maybe because the individual in the home may sometimes see a cost to safety such as purchasing a first aid kit etc, as being unreasonable, where as an employer is legally obliged and will police the use of such equipment. Andrew
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.