Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 22 June 2006 09:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Davis A question was posed to me recently about PPE (safety boots to be specific) The situation was: Company requested three porters from an employment agency to assist with an office move for a period of upto six months. Duties to include movement of packing cases etc., ie a certain need for boots. So, who should provide the footwear? We all know the "employer" must provide and not charge for PPE and that this applies to agency staff as well. But, is the "employer" the agency who the porters are working through or the client company itself? Many agencies have a "no boots - no work" policy, so there has been an onus on temp staff to provide their own boots. I look forward to your opinions. Thanks.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 June 2006 10:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Clifton Richard Who pays the wages? If it's the agency, then the agency should provide. If it's the client , then the client provides. Whoever pays the wages is the employer and, under Reg 4 of the PPE Regs, the employer is required to provide. Adrian
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 June 2006 10:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert (Rod) Douglas Hi Richard, I came across this situation about 3 years ago during refurbishments at Harmondsworth Removal Centre when I was their Fire Health & Safety Manager. It is the responsibility of the Agency to ensure that "their" staff have the appropriate PPE. Always ensure that you are using a reputable employment agency. Hope this helps. Yours Aye, Rod Douglas
Admin  
#4 Posted : 22 June 2006 10:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By stephencarey We no longer use agency workers, but when we did if they arrived without the basics boots gloves hat they were not allowed to start work Other items masks ear defenders etc.unless specific to their jobs we provided. This was a stated condition of placement with the agency on all staff they provided. This worked, not sure of the legalities though.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 June 2006 10:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson ITs quite specific the 'Employment Agency' is the person who should be supplying all PPE/RPE for staff they supply.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 22 June 2006 10:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By George Wedgwood This is a common problem with Agencies and we can't as clients, expect them to know our specific risks unless we discuss our requirement in detail with them - and, as necessary, share relevant task instructions, risk assessments and work standards etc. Early discussion and sharing of H&S advice leads to delivery of fairly competent workers already prepared and aware of the work to be done. Failing that, the client will have no option if they are to be protected in law, to deliver the basic H&S awareness training and relevant PPE prior to a start on site. Remember that Agency work is simply a contractual agreement and imposes a responsibility on the client to take reasonable efforts to protect workers and cooperate with the contractor (Agency in this case). It can be agreed that the Agency actually takes the full H&S responsibility for training and PPE but that needs a good contract document! In my experience, a sound system works well when the client treats the Agency as their own staff and my last employer did just that with considerable success. George
Admin  
#7 Posted : 22 June 2006 11:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Christopher Kelly Definitely not the worker. The relationship between the agency and the employer is contractual, however I would suggest that the duty is on the employer who has the risk, unless the agency is providing workers who would generally be expected to work in an environment where there was a risk of foot injury. Regards
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 June 2006 11:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson Use the business contract drawn up between agency and the host company requiring labour that: - For any length of agency contractor employment - days, weeks , or even years - It is the agency's responsibility to provide fit for purpose PPE (as detailed in our job description for worker requirements)for all agency workers at the agency cost as part of the agreed fee for workers on site. It is the host company's responsibility to ensure that when the agency worker arrives on site, he has brought that PPE with him / her and that they are wearing it for the job requirements. The host company have the right to refuse entry to any agency worker not arriving on site with fit for purpose PPE. If written up and countersigned by host and agency as part of the formal agreement prior to workers starting, there should be no misconception of who buys and who has to wear as part of the job. Don't forget how many firms regularly buy in agency labour for one day only or parts of a week (a fitter or a welder for a quick breakdown repair if they don't employ their own regular maintenance crew)- would you expect the host to pay out for boots, gloves etc for every different one day visit? I don't think that would be practical, and there'd be lots of newish PPE etc at local car boot sales.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 22 June 2006 12:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Agencies have long argued that under the H&S@WA they are not the employer and to some extent courts have taken the view that both parties (the agency and their customers) both have a duty of care to the employee. Unfortunately it is not a simple case of who pays the tax or National Insurance is the employer. Although Section 9 is clear, it still leaves a grey area when it comes down to agency staff. My view is it that it is not the agency, which has a duty of care to provide the PPE, but their client who are also employing these staff. After all it is not the agency is not providing instruction and supervision of these staff.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 22 June 2006 12:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker In a previous job this cropped up. People kept getting sent with no PPE. I visited the Agency office and threw a strop saying we would dump them (the agency)if staff turned up with no PPE. Then all was well, later I found out that the agency made the staff (following my rant) buy their own kit. I called in HSE inspector who visited the Agency MD and told him in no uncertain terms what would happen if this continued. Agency staff thought I was some sort of saint for long after!!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 22 June 2006 12:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker See above, this was only shoes - we provided everything else
Admin  
#12 Posted : 22 June 2006 12:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve B I do not use agency workers, but in my previous job I did. I would inform the agency what the worker would be doing.... i.e. THE RISK ASSESSMENT. and would expect the worker to turn up with all the relevant PPE to enable him to comply with said risk assessment. as above specific PPE ear protection, goggles etc i would supply, but the basics like boots, the agency (employer) Regards Steve
Admin  
#13 Posted : 22 June 2006 13:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Christopher Kelly For the sort of labour provided for this job, the agency could not be expected to carry out a PPE risk assessment. If, as someone else has said it is an agency providing short-term labour into a specific trade then they might be expected (contractually) to ensure people on their books had the right PPE. However the duty definitely lies with the employer,as the person who can carry out a job specific risk assessment identifying PPE required. Contractually they may then negotiate with the agency as to who should provide the PPE, however contractual arrangements are nothing to do with the duty under H&S@WAct. The primary duty here is on the employer. Regards
Admin  
#14 Posted : 22 June 2006 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Caboche Following the introduction of the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003 on 1st April 2004 client companies are now required to forward to employment agencies a suitable and sufficient risk assessment before they can send personnel to worksites, to allow sufficient information to be given to the temporary worker. Risk assessments should be site and task specific. This also allows agencies to decide what PPE they need to provide their employees with based on the risk assessment. There was a short article on this in the MIIRSM's newsletter about approximately 2 years ago, and as I was working for a company that undertook track labour supply on the railway, we informed all our clients of this new set of regulations. Mind you I can count the number of risk assessments I received on the fingers of one hand over the course of a year. As an labour supply agency, we used to supply all of our operatives with PPE apart from boots, for which they could either choose a pair up to a certain value or were given an allowance, but then the railway is a lot stricter than a lot of industries when it comes to this. Hope this helps John
Admin  
#15 Posted : 22 June 2006 13:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith In the case of Dacas –v- Brook Street Bureau, it is established that “the end user” is the employer and not the agency. Therefore if a business is employing agency staff, they should be providing the PPE, not the agency.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 22 June 2006 13:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith In the case of Dacas –v- Brook Street Bureau, it is established that “the end user” is the employer and not the agency.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 22 June 2006 16:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Davis Very interesting reading fellas, thanks for taking the time to reply. The score upto this point (as far as I can make out) is: Agency 3 votes, Employer/Client 4 votes, and as expected Worker 0. There are other comments that lean toward one or another, but I've counted only firm answers. Kinda inconclusive realy???? I'd fear the responsibility, if placed on the agency would be deflected to the worker with the helpful...."our client needs all staff to wear safety boots, have you got some????.....no, well we can't offer you the work unless you've got some" Agency worker gets stiffed again as the other two parties pass the buck.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 22 June 2006 16:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Parkinson Had an instance where agency workers were turning up with footwear. We supplied the workers and then deducted the cost from that which was paid to the Agency. They never complained and the workers got themselves new boots which they could take with them.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 22 June 2006 17:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Bill, I like your solution!
Admin  
#20 Posted : 22 June 2006 19:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Admin  
#21 Posted : 24 June 2006 13:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank E. Davidson Only way to be decent about it if you're too tight to provide saftey equipment for people under your duty of care is to specify in the contract with the agency that they provide PPE for their people. Many agencies already take a huge cut from the people who work for them and instead of working for a rate a little higher (which is fair to cover the periods they are not working) than the permies they are paid less.
Admin  
#22 Posted : 24 June 2006 19:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd It's illegal for employment agencies to charge someone either for obtaining employment for them or for their continued employment. They usually charge to end user a set fee or an hourly rate. Employment agencies must comply with the minimum standards of conduct set by the Employment Agencies Act 1973 and regulations. An agency must not charge for finding or trying to find work (with some exceptions, mainly in entertainment and modelling) An agency employing you to do temporary work must give you written terms, and must pay you, even if it has not been paid An agency which collects your pay from an employer must pass it to you within ten days, unless you request otherwise
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.