Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 June 2006 11:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim-F I heard that an accident happened recently where two guys were working in a cherry picker and 1 guy had a harness and the other didnt however my information is that both were killed. Anyone know anything about this, I would like to use the information of these unfortunate souls to educate our workforce. not sure of the location
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 June 2006 15:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali An interesting one. Harness + lanyard comprises PPE and we are always told by the HSE (also mentioned in PPE Regs) that PPE is "the last resort" and that priority should always be given to a safe system of work. The WAH Regs defines a Hierarchy of Controls to take and PPE is, not surprisingly, half way down. First is Avoidance, then Fall prevention (guard rails etc) where collective is better than personal, then Fall arrest such as bags / nets where collective again takes precedence over personal measures (PPE. Using this guidance, a well guarded safety cage with toeboards should be adequate so long as the operative doesn't try to lean out, over reach etc. Of course, there is nothing to stop you adding PPE to this safe system of work, providing it doesn't replace it or compromise it in any way. Does this help ?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 23 June 2006 16:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Parkinson There will always be occasions where MEWPs will need to be used, especially for short term work. The people using them (i.e. those in the cradle) should be trained in its use and all persons should wear fall arrest harnesses and the appropriate lanyard. It is impractical to use nets or air bags as the platform moves (hence the word mobile) and even with adequate rails and toeboards incidents do happen as in some MEWPs the cradle can be tilted so can tip the occupants out. It all comes down to the risk assessment identifying adequate controls measures such as appropriate training, walk round of area of work, ensuring safety of those working below or excluding them from area etc. Until we can eliminate the use of MEWPs there will always be a risk and therefore the potential to have incidents.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 23 June 2006 18:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Chamberlain the IPAF recommendation on this is that all users of a MEWP use a harness and a 'RESTRAINT LANYARD' a fall arrest lanyard will not save the casualty until around 14' at least. The restraint lanyard is there to stop occupants climbing out of the basket, therefore remove the chance of a fall all together, the exception would ba a sissor lift where restraint would stop the occupant moving freely to do their jop, as per risk assesment.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 23 June 2006 21:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin Taylor this discussion on harnesses is a perennial with us - can anybody give a reference on the IPAF guidance and are restaint lanyards readily available as fall arrest are? Martin
Admin  
#6 Posted : 23 June 2006 22:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Fisher Jim My understanding that two guys were working in a cherrypicker in the Highlands when the basket mechanism failed. As the two were wearing harnesses they were prevented from falling and survived. I think there was a maintenance issue. As for harnesses - the safe system of work for cherrypicker, as endorsed by HSE 'guidance' is that the area around the machine should be cordoned off to prevent vehicle strikes and harnesses be worn to protect should the above happen or due to a vehicle strike prevent them being thrown out. See HSE 'guidance' at http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/misc614.pdf
Admin  
#7 Posted : 24 June 2006 13:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Woodage Martin T and all, The link you are looking for for IPAF Guidance http://www.ipaf.org/h10505.pdf Hope this helps.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 26 June 2006 10:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Chamberlain The T5 accident involved falls from a MEWP, a scissor lift to be precise, this was July/August last year, one guy was killed the other seriously injured, reports i heard is that neither were wearing harnesses, but not sure on that as T5 are hot on safety!!
Admin  
#9 Posted : 26 June 2006 11:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JAI Jumping on the thread Are you allowed to work on your own in a MEWP or should you be in pairs in case of an emergency Jai
Admin  
#10 Posted : 26 June 2006 12:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By NLR As a reply specifically to Ian, the guy that was fatally injured on T5 was not working in a MEWP at the time.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 26 June 2006 22:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Chamberlain Jai, you should work in pairs as someone on the ground can lower a MEWP from the ground controls should there be a problem, as long as they have been instructed how to do so!!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.