Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 26 June 2006 17:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nigel Hammond I hope everyone will agree that to be a good H&S professional you need excellent interpersonal skills to influence others. While the majority of contributors to this forum are very civil, there seem to be a minority who do not know how to debate without being very abrupt or worse, issue personal attacks to others. The recent thread on using private cars for company business includes this behaviour by an anonymous individual. I would imagine the moderators walk a tightrope of not wanting to over-censor this forum while at the same time maintaining standards. I don't know what the solution is to this problem, I just wanted to raise it as an issue.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 26 June 2006 18:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Having read your postng I went to the thread. I really can't see that there were any "personal" attacks, more a very lively and extremely useful discussion on application of RTA, PUWER and so on. I have a company vehicule (rover 75, please don't laugh) in which I drive about 30 000 miles each year. Fully insured for business and personal use, MOT equivalent. No problem. Employees use their own cars and are reimbursed at a rate which takes into account wear and tear, insurance for P&B use, fuel and maintenance. This rate is set by government and reduces after 10 000 miles as at that point insurance etc is considered to alredy covered. But that is not the point of your thread. Politeness, professionalism, good humour are the essentials of this chat show. And the occasional bad smelling and grammatical errors. slife, innit. Merv
Admin  
#3 Posted : 26 June 2006 20:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Al.. Some thoughts: In this forum, as in any place where h+s professionals gather, you will get a variety of styles when it comes to how people relate to others. Some people you will like, others you might not like. There will be people who are (1) very knowledgeable and very polite, (2) others who post incorrect/misleading information but do it in a very polite way and also (3) those who really know what they are on about but, at the same time, are somewhat abrupt (and of course those(4) who are both ignorant and rude). With time you will get to know whose opinions you value the most from a professional perspective and also those whose company you enjoy simply for themselves and a bit of banter. On some subjects it might be the views of (3) which are the most useful. In a gathering where we are meeting face to face, someone unknown to the others who is abrupt and rude is going to be ignored. However, someone whose abilities are highly respected will probably command a lot of attention even if he/she appears to be rather bad mannered. In their obituaries are often words like “somewhat eccentric” and “he did not suffer fools gladly”. But they were valued by their profession and were people who really made a difference. I have looked back at the thread Nigel mentions. I know whose opinion I found most useful. Al
Admin  
#4 Posted : 27 June 2006 08:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh Another aspect I find disturbing is that very often people express their opinion as "fact". You then see that there are several such posts - with differing views on the same subject. Sometimes newcomers to IOSH make posts which are seized on by certain people who try to showboat their own (sometimes narrow) area of expertise. I try to use phrases like "in my experience" or "in my view" fully aware that, experienced though I am, I don't know everything. In addition, sometimes the answer is subtly different - I dealt with COMAH issues in 3 areas of the UK on 3 sites run by the same company, and the HSE and EA response was subtly different. Hence the way we managed the issues differed at each facility. So let's be a bit more open minded; if it was just a matter of picking up the regs and ACOPs and reading from them, you wouldn't need safety profesionals. Let's live up to the name "professional" - it means much more than just earning a living from Safety.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 27 June 2006 09:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney You know when all is said and done the "interpretation" of the regs will always differ from person to person. Yes, that is a fair point you make with respect to the HSE giving differing views that will never stop; in the main perhaps due to the background the individual has come from. Anyway, where were we? Oh yes, how it is said and put across. Whilst maybe at times a response is a little forthright, I believe it is because the person responding is fully courageous in their conviction and I for one do not have any issues on that front; Some one liners very often refer to a recent thread or one that has been done to death in recent days/weeks, on that front it is wise therefore to have a look around or run a search for a subject requirement; I can be just as bad, and it’s the old maxim of "How do you spell that word"? "Go look it up in the dictionary" said my Pop's dulcet tones. Yep the information was there all the time, if you get my drift, so to speak. CFT
Admin  
#6 Posted : 27 June 2006 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson I always try to give some form of practical solution that may not refer to legislation, but could be useful in whatever workplace. If people can easily understand your thought process without getting bogged down in the "reg 3 - reg 4 states" answers, then perhaps I am being of service to others. If any question could be easily misread or misinterpreted, then I have also occasionally replied, suggesting a clearer way to phrase the question - hopefully not offending the thread originator. I find that I can learn something every day on these threads in areas where I do not have everyday experiences, and I am grateful for that free education and inherited safety advice. I also thank those who put in connections to various web sites that prove of use. I like to think that I get on with people but can provide the steel if necessary to put over a safety related argument to all levels of workers and staff, up to Board level.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 27 June 2006 11:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bunny I think that with this many people posting you are bound to get some clashes of personalities. The written word is also notoriously more liable to cause conflict because it removes the ability to add intonation etc.making comments more easily misinterpreted. There are some heated debates on this forum but that can be good becuase if we all just agreed with one another then we would never move forward as a profession. Sometimes things get heated because people believe passionately in what they are talking about. Personally I would rather see some passion than people not caring about what they are doing. On another point I think we should all try and remember that we all take offence at different things. I don't take offence at heated debate because I put it in the context of a debate. I was brought up to debate things in life with friends and family and was taught to see that as healthy. However, some people see heated debate as a personal attack. Even if it wasn't meant to be. Conversely there are many I things I find offensive on this forum that are accepted by the majority. Sexual remarks / jokes about women for example (I'm female if you haven't guessed!). However, whilst I take offence at the remarks made I accept that they were not made with the intention of offending anyone and so I don't say anything. Maybe we should try and bit a bit more tolerant and accepting of the fact that sometimes we all come across on this forum in a way that was not intended.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 27 June 2006 11:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Lets hope this forum will remain chatty. Otherwise I for one will stop reading it. Often I log in for some "like minded" company rather than specific H&S issues. Its up to you to fillet out the poor responses from the gold, I find it fairly easy to do so. Also remember it takes two to have a fight, nothing offends me as I don't set out to be offended.. Personally, this site has given me more help and inspiration than any other single thing in my career and long may it be so.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 27 June 2006 15:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nigel Hammond OK, so no-one agrees with me but it's so nice to have responses that politely disagree! All the people who have replied so far have excellent interpersonal skills!
Admin  
#10 Posted : 27 June 2006 16:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jackw. Hi all, I was/am one of those who was a bit critical of the thread on company cars. I still feel PUWER etc.is mostly OTT and that individuals should be responsible for maintaining their own car when used for work. business mileage paid etc. I don't believe i was personal attacked anyone else etc. or do I need to improve my interpersonal skills. Just expressing my view. Oh I like the rover 75. but i do drive an 8-year-old rover 400. well maintained and always road worthy. tax, mot insurance etc. in place at all times. Cheers
Admin  
#11 Posted : 28 June 2006 17:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sue Powell Hi All This thread could go on forever but - you know we're none of us Gods. We have an opinion, expert or not, and I thought that the point of this forum was to exchange thoughts, ideas and opinions. If we're nothing else we ought to be professional enough to do that without taking the hump if someone else disagrees. And you know sometimes those who aren't as academic or qualified as others can have great ideas/opinions that come straight from their experience of good practice. So let's not get too hung up about protocol and who knows better than who and just help one another eh?! Sue
Admin  
#12 Posted : 28 June 2006 19:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Nigel I wonder to what extent you are confusing 'interpersonal skills' with a host of other issues. Voluntarily taking part in an online discussion forum may indicate a variety of conditions But as a reliable or valid indicator of 'interpersonal' skills, it compares poorly with a host of other indicators. To what extent were you actually conducting a training needs exercise about analytical skills under the guise of the subject you posted?
Admin  
#13 Posted : 29 June 2006 09:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nigel Hammond Hi Kieren, I can assure you there is no guise or hidden agenda to my thread. Perhaps I chose the wrong subject line for my thread - perhaps I should have called it 'being polite and respectful to others'. What got me going was another thread I contributed to where someone came back with vitriolic comments that were accusing me of making up figures. I tried to deal with that one diplomatically rather than fuelling it with counter-attacks - as counter-attacks or defensive responses would have only exacerbated the situation. Then I saw the thread about driving in which someone tells someone else that their opinion is 'rubbish'. May be it's my upbringing but to me this sort of conversation is not polite. There are far more respectful ways of disagreeing with other people. As others have pointed out, email lacks intonation and body language so can seem abrupt. This makes it all the more important to think carefully about wording so that it is polite and respectful - that is assuming that being polite and respectful is a good thing?
Admin  
#14 Posted : 29 June 2006 10:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Eyup, As one of the contributors to teh driving thread, I have to agree with Nigel that there was some flak flying around. It is possible to disagree without using terms like 'rubbish'. I tend to offer things with one of two approaches. If its an opinion, based on an interpretation of regs or experience or something I can't source, i do try and remember to say that its my opinion. If its and actual form of words in the law, or the result of a case or prosecution that I know of, or seomthing that's happened to people in my immediate knowledge, I will offer this as a statement of fact. But there's no need to be rude, John
Admin  
#15 Posted : 07 July 2006 09:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nigel Hammond Thanks John. It's nice to know I am not completely alone in thinking that people should be nice to each other on this forum! Judging by the recent OHSAS 18001 manual thread, it seems that outrageously rude and ungrateful posts will continue to happen. However, it was re-assuring to see a number of people speaking up for good manners - even if it got a bit out of hand. I'm glad the moderators just stopped the thread rather than removing it. As I said previously, it provides a tool to help employers/clients etc to Google search leading to this forum to get an indicator of what people might be like to work with!
Users browsing this topic
Guest (5)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.