Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard Beales
For those of you who take out PI cover through the Oval 'IOSH Members' Scheme', some info which may be useful.
1. I thought this scheme was only through this one broker - it is not.
2. I have used this scheme without question for 4 years, but have now discovered that the policy offered is good but attracts a high premium level when comparing with some others. Many small H&S consultancies like my own do not need much of the cover offered (eg pollution cover, any one claim as opposed to aggregate limit basis), and a suitable alternative policy is available for around 50% of the premium.
Having spoken with Oval they were helpful and indeed offered me a policy with their underwriter which suited my business needs AND was considerably cheaper. I do feel members should be given options depending on their needs, and not have to have a level of understanding needed to query policy terms before being offered that option.
Perhaps I am alone in not querying this sooner, and I should have read the small print, but I thought PI was PI. Like any other insurance, cover can vary significantly, along with the premium.
Richard Beales
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
Well put Richard.
I fear a censorship arising however!.. You have doubted the Master!
I certainly shop around for mine now, after, like yourself, paying inflated premiums for irrelevant cover.
Take care!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Hazel Harvey
Gary,
Richard contacted me about this and I could see no objections relating to this post which is offering advice to other IOSH members. IOSH don't recommend any particular PII scheme but do have some organisations which can be contacted if a member doesn't have their own source. The circumstances of all members are different so we would always advise members to shop around before purchasing what can be an expensive policy.
Hazel Harvey
Director of Professional Affairs
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
Thanks Hazel.
Take care!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By R Joe
Richard, thanks for the information. On the back of this I've recently spoken to Oval (I'm currently with Sennett) and although they are willing to (maybe) offer some flexibility (Sennett are not - their wording is 'fixed' apparently), the maximum discount appears to be 25% but at a significant price eg a policy based on an aggregate instead of per claim basis, and an excess of £1000 per claim instead of £250, which makes any saving potentially a bit hollow in the event of any claim! Can you provide any more details and/or can any other colleagues give a definite steer on which other brokers are worth talking to. Like Richard I went to Sennett and Oval/Bland Bankart first time around, but now want to understand a bit more about what the options actually are.
Thanks & regards RJ
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bill Parkinson
When I was a consultant I arranged my own insurance through an independant broker. Cannot remember who the policy was underwritten by except that it wasn't Sennett or Oval.
Think Hazel is right it pays to shop around!
Bill
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By R Joe
A further thought on this - perhaps to the moderator - could the Consultancy SG offer a view or steer. This must be an issue for many of its members, of which I'm one!
Thanks RJ
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Linda Crossland-Clarke
Hi folks
I did quite a bit of shopping around, but if you mention CDM, Asbestos or even Training as an activity not in theory (e.g. First Aid) a lot of companies ran away!
I would be interested for members to email me direct - last year we paid about £700 - if you are getting a better deal, please make a recommnedation.
Regards
Linda
I don't know!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Is Kismet
Oval, £765. £1M, £250 excess. Don't touch asbestos but do general H&S training, not into pollution.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Is Kismet
I have used Oval (and Bland Blankart before them) because I thought they were recommended by IOSH!
Mmmm, good posting, pity I have just renewed.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rob T
Unfortunately, and even after talking to the insurance people at IOSH conference on the different stands, no-one would offer me professional indemnity for advice at any price as a freelancer. Has anyone else had this problem? (I must say that I quite often work at the higher end of the risk market though). I'd always been indemnified by companies I directly worked for in the past so it wasn't a problem.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John McFeely
Sorry to digress, but has anyone actually heard of a Health and Safety Consultant being sued?
Do we really need £1 000 000 worth of cover?
IOSH could diversify and offer reasonable cover to it's members for a reasonable cost, based upon their grade of membership, CPD and activities. With the amount of IOSH members requiring insurance they could surely underwrite it themselves or introduce a brokerage department.
Good thread Richard, one which should cause a lot of thought.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter
We won't hear about a consultant being sued unless it gets to court and most insurers will make sure that doesn't happen for fear of setting a precedent. I now get my PI cover from Norwich Union; it saved me a packet compared with my previous insurer.
Paul
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By R Joe
Some useful additional thoughts on this. Going back to my Consultancy SG suggestion and related to the comment about the likelihood of being sued, one of the associated issues to think about is the robustness (or otherwise) of the terms and conditions applicable to a contract - because one of the issues you can be sued over is of course breach of contract, therefore wording could be very important. A thought - can, or should, the Consultancy SG provide maybe a set of generic T&Cs that we could collectively benefit from, at least as a starting point (in addition to a list of potentially friendly and cost effective insurance brokers)? I appreciate that the Consultancy SG is only the sum of its members and they may well say with some justification ‘what are you contributing to this’, but, a main reason for SGs, as I understand it, is to provide advice to members on key common issues.
Regards RJ
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.