Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 July 2006 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gareth W Jones I dont normaly post threads, but normaly view on a weekly basis, almost an year ago we had a serious accident, were an employee removed a fixed guard and placed his hand inside a tool, this employee lost parts of two of his fingers, as a company we looked at all the work we had carried out (Risk assessments, training, signs, etc etc) the conclusion if somebody wants to break all procedures and by pass all the safety nets, they will just go ahead and do it!! But why??? This started me on a journey to look at safety behaviour, lots of companys out there believe they are incident free, untill the silly accident occurs.... after 6 months of giving training on safety behaviuor and with some brilliant results we are now issuing out our own "Home safety pack" glasses, ear defenders, Mask, gloves etc, minimum cost but very beneficial, in short we feel positive that our safety culture has changed and that it has been well worth spending our time and effort in this area!!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 July 2006 20:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Gareth As there are no responses thus far I feel your obvious enthusiasm deserves a response. I am pleased to hear your safety culture has improved and presumably your incident rate has also fallen. You only describe a one off accident but there must be many others. I am great believer in the safety culture phenomenom. However, it takes time to change the culture and you do not indicate over what period this has happened. Even in the safest environments accidents and incidents will still happen. The best you can realistically expect is that they are minor ones and totally unpredicatable. Not sure what you mean by a 'home pack'? Are you advocating staff use SSoW and PPE at home? If so, it might be taking it just a little too far. Regards Ray
Admin  
#3 Posted : 05 July 2006 11:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gareth W Jones Hi Ray, Thanks for your response the home safety packs are just general ppe with simple tips on were they can be used around the home and garden, my advise is that if an employee uses the ppe and saves themselves having an injury at home they are then able to come to work, I dont believe this is taking safety too far, as a collegue with almost three years of delivering safety behavioural training told me he allowed employees to take Gloves home to be used in the garden, this was the starting point of the change in his culture, I know that by taking this a step further over the last 6 months we have had some great results and changes here.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 05 July 2006 13:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Helen Horton I like the holistic approach - that is what behavioural safety is all about. What's the point in teaching someone how to lift and handle safely at work and then have them put their back out gardening because the culture says "no need to try this at home". I always talk about "off the job safety" as well as workplace safety in training courses, good working behaviour should become habitual and that means applying what you learn in all situations not just within the confines of the work environment. An accident at home can be just as disabling as an accident at work and just as preventable with the right approach and right equipment. I'm pleased it is working for you and you are seeing an improvement in culture and behaviour.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 05 July 2006 14:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson If applied properly, the method of allowing people to take home PPE for home use would keep more of the workforce at work rather than injuring themselves at home at weekends on diy projects. It's both a moral and logistic issue - in our case, our guys are all woodworking manufacturing people so can do outside (barrow / guvvy) jobs at weekends easily. If they use PPE, we will most likely have them back at work on the Monday, so we gain on staffing levels! - the benefit is more staff at work during the normal working week. - the cost is the borrowed PPE. Open question - do our illustrious members always take and wear their company's PPE if doing home jobs? Does the firm know you've got it? Or don't you use PPE at all? My prescription safety glasses are worn as much at home as work ! There again, I work for the real gaffer at weekends !!
Admin  
#6 Posted : 05 July 2006 14:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gareth W Jones A response to myself when I started giving ppe for home was that an employee who picks up his gloves, (which he has been given free of charge) to carry out a task in the garden or in the home is more than likely to wear and use his ppe in the workplace, "Safety Behaviour" changing habits, changing culture!!!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 05 July 2006 14:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali Well done ! If you wanted a "role model", you could try to get some background info about the company "de Puy International". They claim to be more or less "accident free" and this is based around the safety culture within the organisation. I have been to one of their seminars and was quite impressed. Ali
Admin  
#8 Posted : 06 July 2006 14:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julia R The funny thing about DePuy International as they had a bit of scandal a while ago as their products were causing serious health problems, when "Certain types of shoulder and hip joints used in thousands of replacement operations may be more likely to fail early". There's clearly more to safety than a safe work environment.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 06 July 2006 15:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali Thank you for reminding me - I made a Freudian slip ! The company is NOT de Puy, but du Pont !! Incidentally, I did visit a du Pont seminar and was impressed ! I don't know if they have a website, but I imagine they do. Sorry, for misleading my colleagues. Ali
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.