Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 July 2006 16:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AJM Hi all, I am trying to get my management to take on board Banksman training and as usual the words take a horse to water but can't make it drink spring to mind. I have sourced a competitive company and gave some rationale behind it for my company. But as usual the hierarchy are worried about the cost of the training and reasons for it. In their words not mine "its a licence to print money WHY should I have to train people to reverse vehicles" So as you can imagine I am looking for any case studies or experience or any better way to help them understand the importance of training people who reverse vehicles to be banksmen. I sometimes wonder if a hammer and chisel would be the best option to get it across lol Thanks in advance Alan
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 July 2006 16:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Bish Might be worth a look at the HSE web site under waste management. They have just issued new guidance entitled " Waste and Recyling Vehicles in Street Collection" where the driver is shown to be helped by a reversing assistant or assistants. Similar principle to the traditional banksman, but directed more at making it safe for the driver to manouver than to signal which way to turn.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 July 2006 17:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Cartridge AJM Not wishing to sound Obtuse, but have you tried explaining the cost of an accident to them, caused by not providing a trained banksman. This may clear their minds. Regards Andy
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 July 2006 17:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AJM Oh yes I have mentioned one particular case to them where as i remember it cost a big retail company £800,000 that was partly caused by the lack of a banksman. Also I mention all the time that an accident costs a company £1200 according to HSE figures. You wouldnt believe I have actually reduced accidents by 50% here thus saving the company £4000 a month. Maybe I take things to serious, but I am very passionate about my work as most are in this field. But we dont all work in environments where things are embraced so easily. To get to that is the biggest challenge of all. Thanks for help so far anyway. Alan
Admin  
#5 Posted : 18 July 2006 19:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Hi, We use banksman for assisting with reversing vehicles where the risk assessment has identified the need. I agree with your point that the training can be very expensive which we also found so we have trained a driver who now delivers some of the training in-house. May be another alternative if cost is the barrier?
Admin  
#6 Posted : 18 July 2006 20:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shane I assume that we are all bearing in mind that a banksman is at the bottom of the HSE hierachy of controls for vehicle movements?!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 19 July 2006 07:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson What type of work and in what process is the banksman required? Warehouse, customer presence, vehicle movements across site to delivery areas? What size of vehicle or trailer is being moved around in reverse mode? Knowing these facts could actually make a different system work better than the use of a banksman. Try remote rear of vehicle cameras mounted on trailer boards with a display in the vehicle cab - we've tested these when reversing 40 foot long mobile home units towed across into site positions by one man using a large tractor as the towing vehicle. Just one example of how to sideline the need for the banksman.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 19 July 2006 08:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve B AJM, Its never easy convincing managment to spend money on something they dont understand or dont want to understand. Q. How many reversing accidents have you had? Q. Banksman training for reversing vehicles is quite a simple process and the HSE produce Workplace transport safety HSG 136, why not do it yourself? save money for your managment, get the training done, issue a Safety instruction, get the management to implement it, monitor and review. its a Win Win, of course I am saying all this without understanding your background. Regards Steve
Admin  
#9 Posted : 19 July 2006 08:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jackdaw I'm one of those people who believe that we often go over-the-top with health and safety, putting measures in place which aren't really warranted. However, I do believe in using banksmen when the situation requires it. I was in a similar position; did risk assessment which identified the need for trained banksmen due to large vehicles having to reverse in very restricted delivery yard. Management didn't want to pay for training or have banksmen at all - they insisted that we would keep all people and internal transport out of the area and leave it up to the lorry driver to reverse (there fault if something is hit!!) One of the delivery drivers complained to the HSE; we had a visit; we now have trained banksmen. Managers aren't totally stupid (most aren't anyway), they know that they should do it. They think that if they bat it back to you: "why do we need to do it?", then it takes the responsibility off them - they're just stalling. I would do a simple report detailing the findings of risk assessment, reasons for having trained banksmen, and consequences of doing nothing. Present it to them and leave it to them to decide - keep raising the issue at every opportunity (management meeting, safety committee, etc), and if something happens they can't say they weren't told.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 19 July 2006 09:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AJM Thanks for all the replies and ideas, but to answer a few points from the thread. 1. Yes Shane requiring a banksman is the bottom of the HSE hierarchy of controls for vehicle movements, I took it for granted you would think all other options one way traffic etc had been looked at by me. 2. The work is loading and unloading vehicles on site (approx 10-15 per day) by fork truck 3.5t,7.5, and articulated lorries, these vehicles are delivery vehicles that come from anywhere including abroad. 3. The main problem is the company has grown outside the size of the site so reversing is required some smaller delivery vehicles we have on site are in a one way system but not the lorries. 4. My main concern is some people already watch trucks out but I am sure the HSE would require these people to be competent, but trying to get management to realize this is often difficult. An old saying I always remember is "There is no one so blind as those that don't want to see" 5. I have considered doing it myself I do the training and awareness in the company also, but the last time I did I had to do 35 truck drivers in 1 hour sessions 2 at a time not the best time management for me although when I got to the last 2 I was motoring lol. If I have an outside company in they will all get done at once. £300 for 12 people to be banksman trained equating to £25 per person, surely I couldn't of got it much cheaper especially when you think of my wages for 6 sessions of 4 hours but as usual most of these people never look at the big picture. Anyway sorry to sound bitter, this place is getting more like a confessional for me lol. Thanks again for the help.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.