Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 July 2006 08:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phillipe I received a nice lengthy improvement notice yesterday afternoon regarding one of our premises in the north of England. The crux of the notice is that we have alledged to have contravened Regulation 7 of the Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992 and also Sections 2.2 (a)(c)(e)of the HASAWA 1974. This is all to do with the heat in the premises. 50,000 sq ft environment with air handling unit rather than a/c. Fans and localised mobile a/c are in place. Employees have been given the following advice: relaxed dress code, provision of cold drinks, additional breaks to rest, provision of chairs to sit down if required and also working hours changed to suit needs so earlier starts earlier finishes etc. The premises is running to it's maximum electrical capacity so that means if we were to intoduce a/c a power upgrade would be required at a huge cost without the cost of the a/c equipment. We have estimated a conservative figure of £100,000 to cover this....can anyone tell me that is reasonably practicable to spend that kind of money....I don't think so. In addition the RIDDOR regs require you to report heat exhaustion or unconsciousness as a result of heat exhaustion as a major classification. My interpretation is that is only if the individual is hospitalised for more than 24hrs. Can anyone clarify this for me or have i got that wrong? My question therefor is, are EHO's being reasonable in their expectations of some employers or are they looking to make an example of someone? Your comments would be welcome, thanks Phil
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 July 2006 09:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By terryt What is the improvement notice actually requiring you to do?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 July 2006 09:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phillipe Sorry, should have mentioned that... - provide effective temporary local cooling - which we have done - identify heat sources and isolate/reduce them - we have done - provide rest facilities - we have done - task rotation/breaks and limit exposure to heat stressors - we have done - provide thermometers - we have done - Monitoring of situation - we are doing or take any other measures which are equally effective in complying with the legislation I think we will appeal this...
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 July 2006 09:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Clifton Phillipe In order to define what is "reasonably practicable" more info is needed. How many staff are employed in this particular unit? From your posting, this unit appears to be one of two or more in the country, so is a/c provided in any of the other units? Lastly, what level of financial turn-over does your company generate? If the answers to these are around 100, yes it is provided elsewhere within the company and turn-over is in the 10's of millions, then I would say that is reasonably practicable. This may not be the answer you were hoping for and it is only my personal opinion. I am sure that there are others who will disagree with me. Adrian
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 July 2006 09:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By terryt I think that you need to do just what you're doing here, argue that you have fulfilled the requirements of the improvement notice - put it down in the form of a risk assessment. There is always the option of appealing. With regard to RIDDOR, I don't think someone has to be in hospital for 24 hours; the section reads: "any other injury: leading to hypothermia, heat-induced illness or unconsciousness; or requiring resuscitation; or requiring admittance to hospital for more than 24 hours;" It says OR requiring admittance to hospital.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 20 July 2006 09:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bunny Remember that you can appeal against an improvement notice and the notice would therefore be suspended until the outcome of the appeal (unlike a prohibition notice). It's hard to say whethere the notice is justified or not without the full facts. But if you think it's unfair then appeal, they have to give you the appeal information with the improvemnet notice and if they haven't you can slap their wrists!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 20 July 2006 09:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By IanD Appeal … you seem to have done what everyone else is doing, there are probably numerous other companies in your position. It is an official heatwave, you are doing what is practicable for the short duration of the heatwave. First have a chat with the team leader / principle inspector and outline your case, if you get no joy then appeal. Regards Ian
Admin  
#8 Posted : 20 July 2006 10:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Big Brother Dear Phillipe, My first question is, have you visited the store ? My reason for asking this is because you seem to imply that the store is located away from your office by your reference to it being in the North of England. It may be that the story that you are getting is different to that " on the ground ". In my own personal experience I have been let down by store managers not implementing the measures that I have requested. I am wondering why you are asking about RIDDOR, have any staff been taken ill because of the heat? Personally, if there is a " foreseeable risk " I don't think you have a leg to stand on. Hope that this helps. Regards, BB
Admin  
#9 Posted : 20 July 2006 13:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phillipe Thanks for your responses, all points have been noted and all points you have raised are very much appreciated Appeal is now going ahead
Admin  
#10 Posted : 20 July 2006 14:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh You can get a thermal survey done (eg by an occupational health organisation) which will quantify the heat stress on an individual and make reccomendations on exposure times etc There is a standard ISO 7243 which relates. Some of these pratts should get some experience and context before rushing in with improvement notices etc. They should see what it is like working in a steel works or foundry in hig temperatures wearing molten metal clothing! The problem is lack of consistancy by the enforcers, most of whom have never managed anything in my experience.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 20 July 2006 14:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin R. Bessant The response from garyh is offensive and has therefore been removed from the forum. As he has not made his email address visible, I have posted this message with a warning that posting any further similar responses may lead to further action. Martin Bessant - Lead Moderator.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 21 July 2006 12:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope I attended a BOHS lecture about thermal comfort and the HSL expert said he audibly groans everytime he sees an EHO put a notice on a "temperature" issue - apparantly there are 5 factors that are relevant, one is temperature. He gave the impression that such actions are inevitably scientifically indefensible and usually the eho has to back down.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 21 July 2006 13:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter By all means lodge an appeal (I believe you have limited time to do this), but why not also write to the issuing Officer explaining and detailing what you have done in terms of compliance, and ask that the Notice now be lifted/withdrawn?
Admin  
#14 Posted : 21 July 2006 13:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CRT Phillipe. have you taken these actions since the notice was served or were they already in place ?, if so the notice has been complied with. I would also ask whether the eho spoke with you prior to serving the notice to discuss the issues and to identify a way forward. As far as the notice goes, it is difficuly ( as other have stated) to comment to much without knowledge of the situation. In my experience, you tend not to see many notices for thermal comfort - both hot or cold because of the reasonably practicable issue, remember the weather conditions we are experiencing at the moment are not typical. a word of caution, most eho`s would`nt serve a notice if they thought there were grounds for appeal, as a previous comment noted, be sure of what is actually going on at the branch.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 21 July 2006 13:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steven bentham If you feel you have taken all reasonable measures you should write formally, in detail and clearly on how you have complied. Undertake some on site monitoring over the weekend and include that in your letter to show the improvements. copy the letter to their Chief Executive and offer a meeting to deal with any other issues. Provide hot or cool drinks with biscuits and be very nice. If you have complied with the Notice there is no need to appeal as you have satisfied the grounds the notice was served on.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 21 July 2006 14:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steven bentham You may wish to exercise some caution in what you post on the internet. Ask for advice fair enough but you should assume the regulator can read this the same as I can.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 21 July 2006 14:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony W My thoughts exactly Steve. I dont think it would take a genius to work out which organisation you are divulging fairly confidential/sensitive information about. Good luck though. TonyW
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.