Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 July 2006 11:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By sian Hi Can anyone help me, I need to carry out a fire risk assessment on my school, I write risk assessments everyday but dont know where to start or how to lay it how, Do I have to include plans of buildings etc.... any feedback would be great... Thankyou
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 July 2006 12:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sheila EJ Keogh hi, the latest fire safety guides, direct from the horse's mouth (the government) are now available on line. Guide 5, for Educational Premises is found under: http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1162108 Don't be put off if its nearly 200 pages!! i'm currently wading through one for supported accommodation and its tortuous, but it tells you what you need to consider & do, and you "just" have to re-write it into a risk assessment format. You can email mr direct if you would like to discuss it more. Sheila
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 July 2006 13:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By sian Thanks for that shiela, im currently downloading it now.. Some spare time reading!!
Admin  
#4 Posted : 27 July 2006 17:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever Sian you don't have to include plans although I think it is sensible to do so. What you do have to do is completely understand exactly what it is that you are undertaking. After all you may get out safely and so may the pupils but someone will have to go in to put out any fires. Firefighters are often overlooked during the fire risk assessment. Some fire authorities are taking a tough stance on inadequate fire risk assessments. I am aware of one in the North who have issued an improvement notice for a fire risk assessment that was considered not suitable and suficient.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 28 July 2006 14:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason McQueen For that very reason Im contemplating contracting it out to a decent third party..
Admin  
#6 Posted : 28 July 2006 15:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By terryt Shaun, I was under the impression that the Reg Reform Order had a requirement for the safety of all "relevant persons" to be considered. A "relevant person" does not include a fire-fighter who is carrying out his fire and rescue duties. I would suggest that you don't consider the fire-fighters tackling a fire in the risk assessment.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 28 July 2006 15:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jackw. Hi, you cant carry these out unles you are properly trained and understand what you are about. Particularly in the more technical areas. I have emailed you a copy of one of ours for a large property. Cheers
Admin  
#8 Posted : 28 July 2006 16:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By terryt Sian Why don't you read the guidance and then decide whether you want to have ago at the risk assessment. Remember that you don't have to do it on your own, it can be done by a team of people who may well be able to bring along different areas and levels of knowledge. Don't automatically believe all those who make out that fire risk assessment is a 'dark art' that can only be carried out by highly skilled fire engineers (usually consultants) because it isn't. It's just like other assessments that require a systematic review to decide whether the controls in place are adequate. I've got no reason to doubt that an improvement notice was issued because an assessment wasn't suitable and sufficient. The improvement notice would have simply required the assessment to be done properly - it doesn't mean your assessment won't be suitable or sufficient.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 28 July 2006 18:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever As an ex-firefighter I'm not sure if I should consider that an insult terry - the suggestion that I am irrelevant! Of course I know you didn't mean it like that. The new regs do require firefighters to be considered as part of the fire risk assessment. It does not mean that you should provide Bretahing apparatus or protective clothing in case there is a fire but you do have to ensure fore example dry rising mains are maintained, firefighting lifts are in working order and fire protection measures are in place so that fire does not spread unseen. Schools are notorious for having voids where fire can spread unseen and break out in another part of the building causing firefighters to be trapped. I speak from experience!
Admin  
#10 Posted : 28 July 2006 18:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever Just in addition to your last comment terry - the improvement notice was issued because due consideration had not been given to the interaction between sprinklers and smoke control systems - engineering I think!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 30 July 2006 00:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By terryt Shaun, Don't take offence, the Reg Reform Order states that firefighters carrying out their duties fighting fires are not 'relevant people' within the terms of the order - it says nothing about ex-firefighters. As schools don't have sprinklers or smoke control systems I don't think Sian has to worry about those. I still say that in the majority of circumstances a group of people from within an organisation can provide a suitable and sufficient fire risk assessment. It is obviously in the interests of consultants specialising in this field to give the impression that 'normal' health and safety people aren't capable of doing a fire risk assessment, but this isn't the case - do it yourself. If you're sure you can't do it yourself, go on a course to learn how to do it.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 30 July 2006 10:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever But Terry read on through the RRO and you will find the following:- Maintenance of measures provided for protection of fire-fighters 38. —(1) Where necessary in order to safeguard the safety of fire-fighters in the event of a fire, the responsible person must ensure that the premises and any facilities, equipment and devices provided in respect of the premises for the use by or protection of fire-fighters under this Order or under any other enactment, including any enactment repealed or revoked by this Order, are subject to a suitable system of maintenance and are maintained in an efficient state, in efficient working order and in good repair. I am not in disagreement with persons carrying out their own fire risk assessments. Indeed I am one of these people who provides training. All I say is that whoever does it must understand precisely what it is that they are doing. At the end of the day most risk assessors will not be risking their lives when it all goes pear shaped, firefighters will.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 31 July 2006 16:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eric Beach Dear Sian I have a risk assessment document that I use for the office and clinic bases that we use in our local NHS properties. Given that you have read what the guidance says about escape routes, I guess it would probably ask the sort of questions that you would need for a school [and I'm an ex-science teacher]. Happy to send you a copy if you want it.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 31 July 2006 16:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Hicks I'm a little concerned that a school doesn't already have a valid fire risk assessment in place, regardless of the current (as opposed to new) regulations. It might not be a legal requirement until later this year but it's always been a sensible measure. Any safely run workplace ought to have 90% - or more - of what's required already in place and documented. That said, the comment about voids is one area we're addressing again anyway (but then we've had a lot of refurbishment work done). I also get the fire brigade round periodically (it's a large site) and would recommmend Sian talks to her local brigade. I'm sure, since it's a school, they'd be very keen to help.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 31 July 2006 21:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim Please don't think I'm just being smart with this answer but anyone assigned to undertake a risk assessment must be competent and it's the employer's responsibility to ensure that! If you cannot carry out the fire risk assessment due to lack of knowledge, experience, training etc. it's up to you to speak up to let the employer know that he needs to be more careful in future. You are obviously out of your depth in this area - peoples live are at stake here! The best people to carry out fire risk assessments are serving and ex fire fighters who have the necessary knowledge and experience of real fires and the resulting tragedies. They can judge hazards and risks associated with fire because "they have been there and got lots of tee shirts etc". The forthcoming change in legislation is an example of a change for the worse not better. I've been doing fire risk assessments since the Workplace Regs came out in 1998 and I wonder why there are now - all of a sudden - lots of people asking the same questions about fire risk assessments.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 31 July 2006 22:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever Crim it's in my interest to agree with you but I don't. Just because someone has attended a few fires does not make them experts in fire. There is a lot more to it than that. No doubt it gives them an advantage but more depth is required.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 31 July 2006 23:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim Hi Shaun, at least we agree that you need "Depth" to be competent about Fire. However one receives the depth whether through first hand experience or in the classroom it is necessary for competence to be proven.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 01 August 2006 08:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By henrys Crim I would have thought that many ex-firefighters will know less about fire risk assessment than me. The most competent ex-fire service people will be the Fire Safety Officers (if that's the correct job title) who dealt with the fire certification process. I have in the past had a fire risk assessment carried out by an ex-senior fire officer (not fire safety) and in my opinion it wasn't worth the paper it was written on. In think it is important to realise that just because someone is ex-fire service doesn't mean they will be experts in fire safety.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.