Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 28 July 2006 17:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Marc Willacy We are a large employer made up of three separate businesses. We want to establish a coordinated approach to health and safety training provision, delivery and evaluation across the group but are unsure of the best way forward. At present each business is doing its own thing. As a result we would like to identify best practice to help us improve.Can you help?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 July 2006 17:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Employ me Merv
Admin  
#3 Posted : 28 July 2006 18:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Marc By building on ergonomic risk assessments, you can progress from the foundation of health and safety mangement, namely human limitations and strengths.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 29 July 2006 08:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian H Marc I think to start with you need to evaluate where the business is. How is safety managed, what is the culture and what value do you get from current training and development. Does training and development improve behaviour and safety performance or does it purely satisfy tick box compliance? I recommend that you get someone external to do the evaluation. NOT because I am a consultant! Because it is common for an organisation to believe that it is in a different place to where it is in reality. For example you may be spending loads of money on a particular type of training, when there is latent engineering risk in one area which should be given priority. So in brief you need to complete the detailed evaluation against the corporate risk to business and reputation, get buy-in that a change does need to occur and then (via a cross-business steering group) develop a decent action plan. This should be headed up by Ops people and supported by safety pros/HR. Remember that training is not always the best way to deliver change. Often the true change comes from working in a coaching capacity with the senior managers and then cascading this through day-to-day actions. Good luck Ian
Admin  
#5 Posted : 29 July 2006 10:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By the badger Marc: This is not an answer to your question but rather another question. If it one which you have already asked and answered then please pass on to the next post. Are you clear why you want to “establish a coordinated approach to health and safety training provision, delivery and evaluation across the group”? You have three separate business engaged in different activities? Each presumably has its own management structure and culture appropriate to those activities. What is driving the need for a common approach to health and safety training? Is there a push for a common approach to other aspects of management across the group or is it just health and safety? Is the group keen to breakdown the barriers between the divisions or is it a strength that each division operates as a separate coherent entity? I once worked for a group where head office saw, what it considered to be, duplication of health and safety functions across component parts of the group and set up a central health and safety function to replace them. To justify itself, the central function then attempted to standardise the approach to health and safety management across the group when it would have been better to have recognised the differences between the parts of the groups. I felt that the central function would have done better to have supported each of the businesses within the group as a separate entity and set up different management systems for each of them which recognised the differences. You say that “at present each business is doing its own thing”. Is that a good thing or a bad thing and why?
Admin  
#6 Posted : 29 July 2006 15:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Davelfc Marc, In my organisation I have just conducted a similar exercise, though rather than standardise I split the organisation down. I work in the construction industry, I conducted training needs analysis from first constructing a training matrix, in fact three as follows: Construction Management Construction operatives Office & Planning Staff I then popualted each matrix with current personel and once I had identified training needs for each matrix, then conducted Gap analysis I then presented the gaps analysis to management prioritised and budgeted the training for this year. I have put together an immediate requirement short term, and more long term training needs. different parts of the operational, administrative business and then various levels of management require varying levels of training. Please contact me direct if you wish. I am not a consultant, but I have been inolved in training most of my working life. In analysis, delivery, producing, supervising and assessing. I hope this helps regards Dave
Admin  
#7 Posted : 30 July 2006 23:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Brunskill Marc, Have you conducted a Training Needs Analysis or is that a part of the brief. Is there an existing competency set that can be built on and is succession planning in place already? Drop me an email if you wish to progresss this and I will give you a call. Regards Tony
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.