Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
A couple of responders to the "union representation" thread have asked "why do you need a consultant"
I started to reply, then decided to start a new thread :
As a consultant (trust me) I am often welcomed by local S&H people because I bring an "outsiders" point of view and can have more influence on management than the local person.
Local people may have started as an ordinary employee, made it to first line and then got "promoted" to H&S. Which means that management will always remember, and regard, you as "one of the workers" That is exactly what happened to me. I had to change sites and countries to get away from that paternalism.
Consultants are not "with" the site/company culture. We are total outsiders and will only have a relationship with site personnel for, at the most 2 or 3 years.
As consultants we have a duty or obligation to help our clients to build a lasting safety culture at their plant. To do this we bring our knowledge and experience of what has worked elsewhere. And what has not worked elsewhere.
Example : I have a site where the main safety inluence is a "traditional" H&S person. Their last safety initiative was to relook at all the programmes that he had put in place over the last 20 years and to see how they could redo them to gain even more advantage.
The plant manager (who knew me from his previous site) asked me in. I proposed a two-step programme ; management responsibility training and Behavioural Based Safety. My recommendations were opposed virulently
by the H&S person.
Fortunately management accepted my ideas and transferred the H&S person elswhere. (which gives more problems at the "elswhere" site)
LTI rate is now half of last year's rate. And employees are taking much MUCH more responsibility (backed up by 1st line) for their own safety.
So, Why do we need consultants ? Because we bring an idependant point of view. Because we are not blinkered by the "culture". Because we bring experience gained from other sites and from other cultures. Because we are (at least some of us) at the "cutting edge" of H&S.
Me, I put it all down to CPD
Discuss.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ian H
Merv
I agree with what you have said. I also think that, like any service, the market dictates the need. Unfortunately in health and safety it is very easy to call yourself a consultant with minimal consulting skills and knowledge.
One of the main benefits I have found is that you are able to draw on many different experiences and situations from past client engagements. It really is a case of selling knowledge backed up with the benefit of an awareness but not direct involvement in the internal politics.
Like any service, it is often sensible to just bring a skill in when you need it, on a project by project basis, rather than paying much more money for the continual support.
Consultancy in this field still needs to become much more professional. I think consultants should be encouraged to undertake both management qualifications and consultancy skills (e.g. Institute of Management Consultancy), as well as the core IOSH CPD.
I also believe that clients/potential clients can be a cause of issues when they insist on paying low rates and are then suprised when they get poor quality work.
Anyway, I'm starting to drift off the subject a bit!
What do the buyers of consultancy services think? What are your expectations and what value do you need in the future?
Ian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John McFeely
I couldn't agree with you more Merv. One thing that you mentioned was
"As a consultant (trust me) I am often welcomed by local S&H people because I bring an "outsiders" point of view and can have more influence on management than the local person."
I have been, as you may have guessed by my previous posts, educated in Health and Safety by the Trade Unions Congress. As a consultant I am still amazed by the respect that I get from clients over their own Health and Safety professionals. As a Union Representative I was never taken serious, but as a Health and Safety Consultant I give the same advice and reccommendations, but am treated so differently.
Think of the money Companies would save if they simply involved and supported their Union Representatives.
By the way how is the tax situation in France?
Jackie
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
The actual title of this thread is curious: it appears from the earlier contributions in particular that of Merv who originated it, that the title means 'why do employers need us (consultants)'.
That said, a couple of comments on earlier observations.
Ian contends 'I think consultants should be encouraged to undertake both management qualifications and consultancy skills (e.g. Institute of Management Consultancy'; as someone who completed a postgraduate diploma in management consultancy delivered largely by members of the IMC, I should warn very, very strongly that the IMC is far, far from a centre of excellence in their chosen sphere of competence. It is worth bearing in mind that the IMC is far away from chartered status; and perhaps that learning 'coaching' skills through another chartered society, the British Psychological Society, is much more likely to achieve the desired goal.
This leads to the issue that Merv and Jackie attribute their motivational impact to 'outsider' status, when independent research might well have attributed their impact much more to the competence of them as professionals who travel about and learning while they pollinate.
My own view on the primary reason that employers need consultants is to learn the best possible options for motivating managers and staff at all levels to blend productivity and safety/health goals.
This can be achieved cost-effectively by adding the methodology of contextual behavioural science (see www.contextualpsychology.org for details) to those already practised through the methodology of behavioural safety.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
"Pollinate" an apt image. Thankyou for that one. I'll use it often.
I too am unsure about the need for qualifications. Mainly, perhaps because I ain't got none. I got bumped from quality manager to "Risk Manager" after an accident. And received no formal training. Just odd bits and pieces on company sponsored subjects. Then got bumped to "European H&S Consultant" (with an experienced colleague to mentor my first job)(Shell Chimie, Berre l'étang)Nostalgie. Agonised for two weeks over the report before setting digits to key board. And I still have a tendancy to do that.
Where was I ? Right. "Why do companies need consultants ?" Mainly I think because they have run out of ideas and are frustrated. "What can we do to change things around, get out of the rut ?"
And if the answer comes "Dunno. Let's ask Merv" That makes Merv very happy indeed.
Merv (himself)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TBC
Why do you also need a consultant? Was asked in the thread 'Union participation' because with so many other experts capable of producing and delivering a training course. They still had a consultant in just to deliver the predetermined course. I’m sure that the H&S experts could have delivered the course even with input from the local union rep. Indeed I’m sure that many union reps are more than capable of delivering the course themselves.
The response in the other tread was not a direct attack on anyone in consultancy – I used to be one myself. Nor was it an opportunity to advertise the services of consultants.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jeffrey Watt
Why do we need consultants?
A cheap way (in the long term) of getting precise expertise without hiring someone full time?
An effective way of improving the current safety paradigm by someone who has been there and done that already?
Outcome driven resource with predictable timelines linked to payment?
Useful to break out of the Monty Python effect (What are we going to do now? What are we going to do now? What are we going to do now? What are we going to do now?)
And last but not least.
To give the rest of us safety plebs working for less than a bin man’s wage something to aspire to (nothing wrong with bin men just using it as a metaphor for low pay, yet they all drive better cars than me and seem happier…sob).
Kind regards
Jeff
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By henrys
I have mixed thoughts about the need for consultants. Firstly, I think it should be GOOD consultants as I imagine, just like any profession, there will be many (alot? some? several?) 'not so good' consultants.
There is another thread running about fire risk assessment and issues around competency to carry them out, with some inferring that experts (consultants) should be brought in to do them.
This is where I suppose I have a bit of a problem as I think that this 'bread and butter' type work should be carried out by in-house people whenever possible. They should update their knowledge and skills to be able to carry the work out (professional development).
I can see that consultants come into their own when the aim is a change in behaviour / culture within the organisation. They bring a fresh pair of eyes, experience from other organisations, and they are new; and like any new person they will be listened to - at least for a short time anyway.
In-house h&s people often have to deal with the day-to-day stuff that local managers should be dealing with, leaving them little or no time time to look at improvements in the culture or systems - this may be the very reason a consultant is needed.
In-house people interact daily with other managers within the organisation and after a short time both will have opinions, negative or positive, about each other - the consultant has the advantage of not having had this interaction.
So I think yes consultants are needed but not for everything, they are best used for those key areas of cultural/behavioural change, not the everyday stuff - otherwise why have an in-house person at all? But that's the theme of another thread I suppose!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By garyh
I would take issue with one "KPI" you quoted - that this year's injury is half last years. Unjury rates can go up and down quite randomly especially over a short period; the smaller the workforce, the more marked this phenomenon is. You need to look at injury rates "long term"..........
Injury rates are also a double edged sword. If you claim responsibility when they decline, then natch you must be responsible when they go up (which they will, they tend to oscillate up and down within a long term overall trend).
So I would just urge caution. As Safety ADVISORS we can only take responsibility for our advice, not the outcome, which is a function of management.
Overall though it sounds like you have made some positive suggestions which appear to be bearing fruit.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Diane Thomason
You are quite right Merv about the credibility of consultants in the eyes of the management (usually.)
Would like to make one point; I am an employee but I certainly don't believe I'm "blinkered to the culture" - I joined this organisation as a, um, "mature" worker having worked in a number of other workplaces, and I do think I can see the culture for what it is. Not all safety people came to their jobs via in-house progression.
Reading your post did make me wonder if the next question should be "why aren't all of us working as consultants"! In my experience the external consultant is taken much more seriously.
BTW why did the safety officer oppose your suggestions so vehemently? do you think it was sheer resistance to change, would it have made more (possibly thankless) work for him when he's too overburdened already? or did he put forward his concerns to discuss?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
garyh
I agree with you about being wary of injury stats but the plant I was citing has 1500 employees and the rates had been trending upwards for the last few years.
I find it fairly rare that rates on a large site start going back up once they have worked on getting them down for a year or two. Does happen after a senior management change. But once they get really into the habit of doing safety the right way then it usually sticks for quite a long time.
As for the previous safety person : I have been known to elements of that company for about 15 years but had never been invited to that site. Their new plant manager came from one of my previous sites, tried to use some of my ideas and got frustrated by the "not made here" attitude he was getting and called me in. So effectively I was forced on to them. So they resist.
That sort of thing can also happen when "head office" call you in to sort out a plant.
'slife, innit ?
Merv
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.