Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 11 August 2006 09:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt Fairgrounds tend to use DC for powering their equipment. Having trawled through a lot of general guidance on electrical safety there isn't much info regards any differences between ac and dc re health effects/shock charecteristics except to say DC doesn't spasm the heart as much(as AC), DC tends to just stop it. The fairground people are labouring under an illusion, I feel, that DC is somehow a lot less dangerous, i just can't find any real evidence that says it has less harmful physiological effects. e.g some comments from the fairground guys "DC will throw you off if shocked but AC will grab you" (AC or DC will cause spasms that will make your hand grip a conductor in my opinion). I think it may be the difference between being run over by a lorry or run over by a bus, you are still messed up whichever hits you. I would appreciate any input by the sparks and/or the rail people who use DC for the trams/trains etc. to advise, in their experience, if there is any real difference between AC/DC shocks. Kind regards Jeff
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 August 2006 11:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker Jeff Just spoke to our electrical chargehand and he says the opposite. That DC will hold you and AC will throw you due to the cycles. Not scientific proof but he has worked on DC systems for 30+ years. Either way its a short root to boot hill. Andy W
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 August 2006 11:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt Thanks Andy The concensus grows that DC is safer than AC 3 phase relatively speaking. I have heard/read that DC can contain a ripple i.e. it alternates a bit. Where's Nicola Tesla when you need him? Cheers Jeff
Admin  
#4 Posted : 11 August 2006 11:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker On top of that I prefer Gun's n Roses Andy W
Admin  
#5 Posted : 11 August 2006 11:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_voltage Have a look at this, with regards to the DC causing lock on this is because DC moves in one direction. AC travels in two directions, the revese moment throwing you away from the point of contact I'm an Iron Maiden man myself and you can whack a bit of metallica now and again
Admin  
#6 Posted : 11 August 2006 11:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt gham wikipedia is excellent I obviously didn't google hard enough cheers mate. "Oh I,ve got big.... For those old enough to remember Bon Scott(RIP) Jeff
Admin  
#7 Posted : 11 August 2006 12:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker Oh Iron Maiden "Run to the Hills" brings back memories does that. (God i'm getting old) Andy W
Admin  
#8 Posted : 11 August 2006 12:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt So now we have opinion that DC is most dangerous and opinion that AC is most dangerous. Could be both are right dependant on circumstances e.g. skin effect, bonding etc. No real concensus though after all. "..sellin them whiskey, takin their gold, enslavin the young and destroyin the old...run to the hillls....run for your liiiiife...." Sure safety is mostly about banging your head off a wall, it's only natural that headbangers fit the role. Jeff
Admin  
#9 Posted : 11 August 2006 12:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker Jeff Try this one http://www.dhyansanjivan...eases/Electric_shock.asp Andy W
Admin  
#10 Posted : 11 August 2006 12:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham With a name like Watt I find ironic that you came up with the question Ha ha like you've never heard that before AC/DC i would still prefer not to encouter either at close range, I have survived and nasty encounter with 415v. Not Pleasant!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 11 August 2006 13:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker Jeff This is getting to me now. Because (unusually) I've got a bit of time on my hands I've been researching and have found the same as you, that opinions differ. DC holds/DC throws AC throws but can defibrillate your heart. Can an expert out there give us a definitive answer which is worse? Even if it's just for my sanity. Andy W
Admin  
#12 Posted : 11 August 2006 13:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham Well i can tell you that fribrilation is bad as you die Higher voltave AC can Defribrilate which is not as bad but you will still mess yourself. DC is safer for Low voltages because you need more mA DC to cause fib so currents can run higher and only if the circut is short because you loose voltage over distance with DC. Running at higher Voltages AC is safer because you have a greater change of survival in the case of defibrilation Does that make sense?
Admin  
#13 Posted : 11 August 2006 13:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt Our server said The Websense category "Non-Traditional Religions and Occult and Folklore" is filtered. Means I cant visit the link you posted Andy. Must involve witches doing live work or vampires putting in solar panels????? Watt('s in a name gham) Jeff Tesla(Mechanical Resonance- another fine album)
Admin  
#14 Posted : 11 August 2006 13:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt gham That does make sense. Seems my fairground guys have observational experience about the DC they work with (under 55V, not sure of the Amps but probably quite high) which just does not apply to every situation. This is good. I am back round to where I started but have had a sense check from peer review. Cheers Jeff
Admin  
#15 Posted : 11 August 2006 13:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Webster This looks like a job for the TV "Mythbusters". As somebody who has been on the receiving end of both a 300v DC shock and a 240v AC shock I can't really say I noticed much difference. They both hurt. This stuff about grabbing or throwing is a lot of guff - at 50 or 60 Hz (cycles per second) the rate of reversal is far to fast to overcome the inertia of anything larger than an anorexic midge. Fairgrounds will use DC because before modern solid state electronic controls, this was the only way to power a variable speed heavy traction motor. I expect that what safety they believe they have in the system is due to the low voltage the fairground systems are run at, not to any difference between AC & DC. Still, I'd love to see the Mythbusters try it. Anyone got a contact?
Admin  
#16 Posted : 11 August 2006 13:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By peter gotch Hi Jeffrey Have you looked at Appendix 4 to HSG175.... 1 The main risks of injury from electricity on fairgrounds are from electric shock and burns. Contact with conductors with voltages greater than 50 V a.c. or 120 V d.c. may give rise to dangerous shocks or burns. In some extreme circumstances, such as high humidity or confined locations, injuries can be caused by lower voltages. (In direct current systems nominally less than 120 V excessive ripple may cause the voltage to exceed 120 V and thereby create a hazard; the amount of ripple therefore needs to be considered.) Prevention of direct contact 5 It is important that precautions are taken to prevent people touching live conductors, with the aim that conductors energised at voltages above 25 V a.c. or 60 V d.c. are not accessible. This can be achieved by using cables, connectors and equipment that are properly insulated and protected against exposure to mechanical damage and stress. Direct contact can be prevented by other means such as placing out of reach and the use of enclosures that prevent access to live parts. In the case of equipment installed inside enclosures such as switchpanels, if the enclosure has to be opened to allow switching or reset operations, any internal conductors that may be live at dangerous potentials must not be accessible. Protection should also be provided against the effects of other influences such as corrosive environments, temperature and the ingress of dust and water; BS EN 60529 provides specifications for degrees of protection provided by enclosures. In situations where exposed conductors must be used to power tracked rides such as ghost trains, safety can be achieved by restricting the voltage to 25 V a.c. or 60 V d.c. In situations where higher voltages are used, such as on older rides, a risk assessment should be undertaken and appropriate protective measures taken to reduce the risks to an acceptable level, but the voltage on exposed conductors should not exceed 50 V a.c. or 120 V d.c. Regards, Peter
Admin  
#17 Posted : 11 August 2006 13:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt Peter On the money. Thankfuly everything has been protected so I don't have any real worries about safety just trying to fathom this assertion about AC/DC effects. Ripple seems to be similar to the fluctuations you get with RMS 230VAC i.e could be up to 320 V AC but the root mean square is a lower figure. Cheers Jeff
Admin  
#18 Posted : 11 August 2006 17:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Cartridge AC/DC I see Andy
Admin  
#19 Posted : 11 August 2006 17:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew W You say DC and I say AC, potatoe, potato, tomaeto, tomato. (Excuse the spelling it's intentional) Sorry I've lost it must be because it's Friday. Andy W
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.