Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SAF
Suitable and Sufficent given the recent events?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete Stewart
Depends on who you listen to. Most passengers interviewed on TV seem OK, although passage of information could have been better in some places.
However, operators seem a little miffed at lost millions.
Given that the 'threat' was to trans-Atlantic flights, why were the rest disrupted?
Pete
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Webster
Pete
Each terminal has only one security/search area irrespective of where the flights are going. Passengers then freely mingle in a common departures area. Passenger can also transit flights without going back through security. So everyone has to be checked.
OK, for the future it may make more sense to decentralise security checks and move the process nearer to the boarding points, but that can't happen overnight.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SAF
Would profiling not have been a more effective approach as a pose to a blanket ban?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Webster
Customs seem to use profiling quite successfully; as a businessman with no luggage on a predominantly holiday flight I remember getting virtually everything short of the dreaded rubber glove!
Unfortunately, profiling for Islamic terrorists would create a form of airport apartheid - black, white, Sikhs and orientals pass through, other Asians get the full treatment - after all, Buddhist and Christian Asians look like Muslims. Somehow I don't see that as being fair to the vast majority of decent Asians, Muslim or otherwise, and is bound to provoke a backlash.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.