Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tom McCrory
Hi Folks
I know I should get a bit of response on this one during the current political climate. I can assure all my H&S people I am the last person to be a bigot, my question is no matter what political party you lean too, or what your feelings are on the wars in countries all over the world, we have people who work in a risk assessment world. I know we may have some members who may give honest but unworkable solutions, I am only looking at this from a H&S angle, (we have staff working on airlines) should we stop all people from an ethnic minority flying, should we continue to keep hand luggage from people, every passenger has a right to fly, where should we stop, how should we control this situation, I am sure this subject must come under H&S not only for our workforce but our people as a nation
Bit of a touchy subject
Anyone want to reply
Thanks
S
Perhaps we can pass this info onto the boffins
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Saracen11
Hi Tom, banning or restricting hand luggage would reduce the risks of people taking on board a flight, items better left elsewhere: booze, weapons, drugs, chemicals, explosives etc. It also speeds up the check-in time - well it did for me and my family last week when we returned from France.
I think it's a persons individual beliefs that challenge our human understanding and spread fear and confusion rather than a persons Ethnicity or place of birth... such a generalisation would be unjust. Where would the line be drawn to say one person is ok to fly where another is not?
"Just because a dog is born in a stable doen't mean it's a horse..."
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jason911
I think the scariest part of this whole new threat is that it will end up being the new Northern Ireland.
There is no solution.
I can see the day when we all have to travel seperatly from our luggauge when using air travel.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jim Walker
It has to be pointed out that the vast majority of these people are totally against injuring their fellow man.
Most of the ones (Muslims, Hindus etc) I know practice what they preach more diligently that those of us from the so called Christian background.
When NI troubles were at their height did the press ever refer to "christian terrorists". Were I a Muslim I think I'd been pretty teed off with being tarred with this brush.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stupendous Man
Jim,
While terrorists in NI were not referred to as 'Christian', they were often categorised by their faith i.e. Catholic or Protestant.
The people who determine the level of threat to security and those who implement it on the front line all have a very difficult job to do - a job that I think is being done to the best of their ability at the moment.
If the facts of previous terrorist attacks in the current climate are that minority ethnic persons are more likely to be involved, then it is only to be expected that that specific ethnic group is subjected to increased scrutiny.
Think back a few years to the thugs who used football as an excuse to get together for a punch-up. They were mostly young white males - therefore, that was the group that was targetted in surveillance.
You assess risk on the basis of the knowledge, facts, experience and information that is available at the time. If the result of this is that one particular group (whether identified by race, age or sex) presents a higher risk, should we really ignore those results on the basis that they do not seem politically correct?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jim Walker
Some of the recent arrests are not asian
That Reid bloke was not asian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Oliver
Its far worse than the conflict the UK had with the IRA.
Look at the devestation that is happening on a numberous continents throughout the world.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SAF
Simply not feasible from a HS view.
Think of the Balkans and especially Yugoslavia, there was no difference in appearance between the muslims and non muslims.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jim Walker
Paul Oliver,
You either have a poor memory or are a young lad.
USA funded terrorism in the UK killed far more than 9/11
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Descarte
A very vague safety related question resulting in a general none safety related and highly controversial discussion with a lot personal opinion and bias. Where a mod when you need one.
Actually going back to the original question, you were asking if you should restrict ethnic minorities in your company from flying?
Oh dear,
Delete thread request here
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Descarte
or reading more thoroughly again, you want to know if you can restrict ethnic minorities from flying to increase the safety of your staff working on airlines?
As you say these descisions are to made on a political UK level and homeland security with backing and agreement from airline operators customs and security forces / intelligence.
Keep up to date on current airport enforcement and requirements for luggage, everything that can be done is being done and adequate security measures are being taken.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jason911
I agree
ABORT ABORT!!!!
Jay
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martin Mulholland
Has anyone asked the question as to why this seems to be affecting only airports? What about rail networks and other forms of transport such as passenger ferries?
Is it an attempt to put budget airlines out of business?
Or is this all just a smokescreen to justify the level of threat we are supposedly under so that our backing of Israel's recent actions seems in some way justified?
Conspiracy theories abound.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Descarte
Ferries were affected and on the day armed police were sent to major harbours and ports including dover where there was some disruption.
Probably not as much so as airlines as this would have been goverened by intellegence gathered by security forces and police
Also not as widely reported in the media
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jeffrey Watt
Tom
The organised bomber will get through and the only defence is the vigilance of the intelligence services leading up to any bomb run.
As for singling out by race, all that does is upset honest folk. Upset honest folk soon become die hard supporters after they have been mis-identified and manhandled a few times.
Just a thought
Jeff
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jim Walker
My thoughts exactly Jeff.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tabs
This is a facinating and complex subject about which many strong opinions will be held.
I cannot see that it is appropriate for this forum though.
Moderators, I support the request to lock or remove it - despite my strong temptation to add to the debate.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jason911
Tabs, I think you should get the cat out again, just for being tempted!
Jay
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul
Ethnic descrimination is one thing that I am sure most people abhor... If we are going down that route why don't we just say every plane bomber to date has been a man so lets ban men from flying.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Neal Clark
This thread seems to have quickly moved away from the subject of health and safety, and the subsequent debate is not one for the IOSH discussion forums.
This thread has now been locked.
Many thanks,
Neal Clark, Web Co-ordinator.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.