Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 August 2006 11:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Roden
Can anyone enlighten me on the following:
We have potable water storage tanks in domestic properties and have a maintenance regime in place for legionella risk assessment and mitigation.
However, some properties have tanks made of an asbestos cement type material.
The maintenance contractor is insistant that the tanks cannot be chlorinated and must be replaced.
Is this because they cannot be cleaned effectively due to the material and it therefore could harbour bacteria ? or
is there a risk of fibre release during the cleaning process (although the material will of course be kept wet)
My initial gut reaction is to simply change the tanks !
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 August 2006 11:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Darren J Fraser
Andy

Are you sure that the tanks in question actually contain asbestos - has it been tested by an accredited lab?
If it is an ACM, then I would strongly advise changing the tanks and disposing of accordingly.
I am not a specialist in asbestos, and I hope that you have contacted a few for advise as well as asking on this forum. It would be interesting to see what the outcome of this post becomes.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 23 August 2006 11:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steven
As a home buyer of an ex council house we also had a water tank that was asbestos and decided on the best action was to replace the tank but leave the old tank where it was as it was in good condition and it would require breaking up to remove as the loft hatch was smaller than the tank. It was a domestic problem but the problem is still the same - remove or not to remove.

Ask a specialist company (or two), they will advise you of your best options.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 23 August 2006 11:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham
sounds like Mr Wilson could help you

I would have thought the tanks are fine if they are in good condition, given the properties of asbestos I would be surprised if chlornating them would damage them and given the nature of chlorine that it would penitrate, although not nesesarily break down biofilm build up

has the water contractor offered a price for changing the me wonders
Admin  
#5 Posted : 23 August 2006 11:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By KEVIN O'KANE
Andy, the risk of legionella in domestic properties is minimal!!! ( because of high turn over of water)I would ask him why he thinks they need doing ...easy money if you ask me....oh those happy days of cash in hand!!

Kevin (Ex plumber, now MIOSH , good move...not , but my knees move better now! )
Admin  
#6 Posted : 23 August 2006 12:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt
I thought an article in SHP a few years back said that most potable water in the UK is delivered through asbestos cement pipes at some point and that up to 2 million particles of asbestos can be found in a litre of potable spring water.

Kinda hard to get at the lungs when it's in your belly?

Did I dream all that or just take it out of context like everything else.

Jeff
Confused of Norn Iron.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 23 August 2006 20:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Andy,

Why are you chlorinating the tanks; are they dirty or is this routine chlorination?


In either case their is no need to replace the tank.

Regards Adrian Watson
Admin  
#8 Posted : 23 August 2006 20:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Andy,

Why are you chlorinating the tanks; are they dirty or is this routine chlorination? If it is routine chlorination. who advised this as it is ott!

In either case there is no need to replace the tank.

Regards Adrian Watson
Admin  
#9 Posted : 24 August 2006 10:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Andy

I have a niggling suspicion that these tanks can no longer be regarded as potable water. Such water has to come from a rising main in current practice. If they are simply the cold water head tanks for the domestic hot water system than I doubt that legionella is going to be an issue because, as already stated, the water turnover is too high, and it will be heat treated in normal circumstances.

Like other posters I would rather they be left in situ even if replaced.

Bob
Admin  
#10 Posted : 24 August 2006 10:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Les Welling
I agree with the post above. However, having worked in a houising environment for 11 years in a previous life, I would have thought that there is no need to worry about legionella. I would replace the tanks though, but would probably advise leaving them in situ if you cannot get them through the loft door!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 24 August 2006 11:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
Why would you replace the tanks?
Admin  
#12 Posted : 24 August 2006 11:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt
I asked previously what is the health risk from drinking water stored in asbestos cement tanks?

I have a suspicion there is none but I ask out of ignorance, repeat ignorance, so are their any specialists who can answer?

Jeff
Admin  
#13 Posted : 24 August 2006 11:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
There is none - and I am having difficulty in understanding why you are being advised to change the tanks.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 25 August 2006 09:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Jeff

None from the asbestos - but do you want to drink water from a tank in the loft/roof void which is at best covered with a loose fitting cover and containing various insect and other detritus? I have found rat carcases in them in communal blocks of accommodation.

Is

The reason for tank changes with these is because of their age and they can now be prone to sudden failure - leading to serious property damage from flooding. If the money is available a Combi boiler is the best bet as the tank then becomes redundant. Change is not however manadatory.

Bob
Admin  
#15 Posted : 25 August 2006 11:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col
Andy in response to your questions. Legionella CAN be found within domestic water tanks, There is more cases of legionella from domestic water tanks than from cooling towers. The HSE have produced a free leaflet for landlords and councils in relation to risk assessments and monitoring throughout their domestic properties, many councils are now producing risk assessments on 10% of all domestic properties whilst conducting gas checks to ensure the safety of their tenants. A previouys response was to chlorinate. Depending on the state of the tanks chlorine will not penetrate biofilm and actually helps bacteria to grow. The chlorine will remove the top layer of bacteria allowing the biofilm to progress faster.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 25 August 2006 12:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
Who drinks water from a tanked supply?

Drinking water should always be from a rising main.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 25 August 2006 12:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
If we could take the real environmentally friendly option and get rid of all the old boilers and install modern sealed condensation boilers the question would go away as there would be no tank. I still cannot think of any normal domestic situation where legionella infection has occurred. The nearest was a nursing home shower which was used only infrequently. Most homes however use instantaneous heaters for showering and therefore the head tank becomes irrelevant again.

Is

Read the original post - these were propositioned as drinking water - Brave souls who drink from it!!

Bob
Admin  
#18 Posted : 25 August 2006 12:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
Quite right Bob. Lost the plot completely.

I'd blame the typist only it was me!



Admin  
#19 Posted : 25 August 2006 13:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col
who drinks tank water?? hospitals, hotels, and some domestic houses have tanks feeding elsons and then branched off into the bathroom cold water
Admin  
#20 Posted : 25 August 2006 13:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col
for those who think of legionella as something which rarely happens check out the following.

http://www.hcinfo.com/le...nella_enews_archives.htm

and

http://hcinfo.com/outbreaks-news.htm
Admin  
#21 Posted : 25 August 2006 13:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Col

Agree that outbreaks are not uncommon worldwide - But there are no clear domestic situations in the lists other than an apartment block which could, from its location, be most likely an airconditioning problem. If aircon becomes common in this country we may see some increase in prevalence.

We need to remember that the bacterium is present in almost all static water and becomes an issue when concentration becomes too high and is then made into an airborne mist.

Bob
Admin  
#22 Posted : 25 August 2006 14:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Young
And then inhaled
Admin  
#23 Posted : 25 August 2006 15:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col
Bob, I was the Legionella Inspector for the local council. We introduced risk assessments for 10% of our domestic properties.(duty of care as we are the landlords and house letting is our business) In doing this we conducted random legionella testing from tank fed systems and showers in different types of buildings, to include age group gender etc. In all we took 500 legionella samples. Out of these 38% came back positive with legionella species serogroup 2-14 and 3% came back with serogroup 1. The samples were taken on different days, at different times, and so on. We found that the systems which had not been used for a week or 2 and contained scaled outlets did have higher counts of legionella. All our council property now have the tanks inspected as part of the health & safety regime whilst our gas fitters are doimg their annual checks. Incidently we also found legionella within 2% of the F & E tanks. and though this does not cause immediate problems can cause problems when the occupants decide to move radiators.

regards
Col
Admin  
#24 Posted : 25 August 2006 15:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
Col

For more years than I can remember (yes Ron, a lot!) I have always understood that water from bathrooms should not be drunk - only water from rising mains is fit for drinking. And following from this (you can usually tell when a supply is tanked or direct by the pressure) I have always advised people to follow this rule whether at home, in hotels or wherever. I've assumed it to be general knowledge, just the same as lifting your foot up when passing over a threshold in a doorway.

Am I wrong?

Admin  
#25 Posted : 25 August 2006 16:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart McPhaden
Water from tanks can be used for drinking purposes provided it is to a BS6700 standard and tested on at least a six monthly basis.

I was my understanding that random sampling for legionella was not advocated by the acop.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 25 August 2006 16:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col
Some may laugh.... but you would be surprised how many people including water treatment companies who say that you shouldnt drink from a tank fed system. The BS6700 states that water from a tank should be of drinking water quality as long as all aspects of the tank complies ie lid, lid vent , insect guard etc. It then goes on to say that if you use a tank to feed drinking water then the water needs to be turned over within a 24 hour period. The high rise flats have cold water boosted up to a tank in the roof. The cold water for the kitchens are fed from the booster tank on the way up and the bathroom outlets are fed from the tank on the roof.. reasons? coz the booster water tank in the basement is of a capacity that will turn over within a 24 hour period. The ACOP L8 states Legionella taesting of water tanks is not nessecary as the water should be of potable quality. The BS 6700 states that if the tank is for drinking purposes then you should take samples on a 6 monthly basis. Cold water from the supplier can be delivered at up to 25C yet you have to store water below 20C. Am I boring everyone yet.... Sorry but I still love the subject.

Admin  
#27 Posted : 25 August 2006 16:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
No you're not Col and I've learnt something new. But tell me, how do you know a tank is well covered, is clean and turns over in 24 hours.

Ah fink a'll stik to ma dads advice!!

I still don't understand why potable water should be checked for legionella in a domestic environment.
Admin  
#28 Posted : 25 August 2006 17:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col
a tank has to have a complete flow of water, inlet on one side, outlet on the other.(cheapest way to remedy this is to fit a sparge pipe) A tight fitting lid with a lid vent( so that the lid doesnt implode). an insect guard on the overflow and warning pipe, insulation to the lid, sides and base (if above a boiler room base insulation is required)no vented returns to the tank and a water meter to ensure the water turn over is complete within a 24 hour period, consider changing floats in larger tanks for the type which have a minimum and maximum level( this lets the water level drop to 6" or so and then fills the complete tank with fresh water).
Admin  
#29 Posted : 25 August 2006 17:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col
As for checking domestic water systems for legionella, A landlord who lets property as part of their business still has to comply to coshh and HSWA
Admin  
#30 Posted : 25 August 2006 17:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
But not withinin domestic premises and only in non-domestic premises where there is a risk of infection.

Regards Adrian Watson
Admin  
#31 Posted : 25 August 2006 17:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
Yes, that't the bit confusing me.

If there really a risk in domestic premises?
Admin  
#32 Posted : 25 August 2006 18:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col
this leaflet is aimed at many different people including council and private landlords.(not just residential homes)

http://www.hse.gov.uk/pu...ionella%20residential%22

Are you saying that because someone catches legionella from a domestic water system the landlord cannot be prosecuted under HSWA?
Admin  
#33 Posted : 25 August 2006 18:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col
the risk may be low but the risk is still there. Speak to HSE pathogens in London and they will confirm that risk assessments and monitoring on domestic water systems is still covered under the current legislation and ACOP guidelines
Admin  
#34 Posted : 25 August 2006 18:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col

More information for employers,

http://www.hse.gov.uk/pu...7.pdf#search=%22iac27%22
Admin  
#35 Posted : 25 August 2006 18:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Col,

Three points:

- Firstly you do not have to deal with all risks - only non-trivial risks; the risk of legionella in domestic properties occupied by the the gebneral public who are in good health is a trivial risk!

- Secondly, the landlord is only liable to the extent that they have control over the property. In respect of domestic premises landlords have little or no day-to-day control, so the best that they can do is ensure that the property is fit for habitation at the point of letting and respond to complaints appropriately.

- Thirdly, monitoring for non-employees is not required under COSHH.

Regards Adrian Watson
Admin  
#36 Posted : 26 August 2006 08:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By col
In response to your 3 points see below the reponse which I received from the HSE when contesting the need for risk assessments and monitoring of domestic houses.

Colin

A generic assessment will be ok so long as you are able to identify the different types of system(s) that you have installed - clearly some systems, e.g. those that do not have stored water such as combi-boilers, will present a much lower risk that others.

As to informing tenants of the risk, I guess you could say that for the majority of situations, the risk is low/controlled but you may want to advise when the risk could increase - as I mentioned, the issue of showers after holidays (I should stress that this is anecdotal information – you may want to discuss this further with ************* at the Health Protection Agency, Colindale, London). I have raised the issue of information provision with my colleague, who was the author of the leaflet and have asked her to consider whether HSE could (in consultation/collaboration with LAs) do anything further to help on this issue.

As I read the Management regs, the disapplication means that domestic
services are not covered - as I understand it this means those such as cooks, maids baby-sitters etc in the employ of a private householder. Your business (as the LA) is the provision of housing and maintaining that housing including the water systems. Therefore you have a duty under S3 of the HSWA to protect those not in your employ, i.e. tenants, from any risks arising from your business - by carrying out an assessment and putting in place appropriate controls.

Hope this helps





HM Specialist Inspector of Health and Safety (Dangerous Pathogens)

Admin  
#37 Posted : 26 August 2006 10:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Col,

I suggest you refer them to Reg 3 of COSHH and to Sect 3 & 4 of the HSWA 74 and the relevant case law.

Regards Adrian Watson
Admin  
#38 Posted : 26 August 2006 10:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Col,

I suggest you refer them to Reg 3 of COSHH and to Sect 3 & 4 of the HSWA 74 and the relevant case law.

Regards Adrian Watson
Admin  
#39 Posted : 26 August 2006 10:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Col,

I suggest you refer them to Reg 3 of COSHH and to Sect 3 & 4 of the HSWA 74 and the relevant case law. Whilst measures such as providing a system that complies with the law at the time is a reasonably prcatical measure, upgrading systems or carrying out ongoing activies such as monitoring are not required.

Regards Adrian Watson
Admin  
#40 Posted : 26 August 2006 10:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Col,

I suggest you refer them to Reg 3(1) of COSHH and to Sect 3 & 4 of the HSWA 74 and the relevant case law. Whilst measures such as providing a system that complies with the law at the time is a reasonably practical measure, upgrading systems or carrying out ongoing activies such as monitoring are not required.

Furthermore, I cannot find any reference to exemption for domestic premises etc in the management regs; the HSW act only deals with non-domestic premises being used for work activities.

Regards Adrian Watson
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.