Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 06 September 2006 09:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Cooper-Abbs
Can i ask what poeples thoughts are in regard to a worker riding on the hook of a crane to be placed into a work position? is anyone aware of any best practice or guidance in relation to this matter?

Many thaanks
Admin  
#2 Posted : 06 September 2006 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By paul harman
I doubt very much that there is any guidance for the operation you are describing. My advice would be to forget doing it this way as a prosecution would definately be on the cards if an accident occurred. I would assume that no risk assessment has been carried out by you or any person connected with this operation and i am flabagasted that the crane company would even think about allowing it.

Please, please, please, think again about the operation you have described.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 September 2006 10:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham
as long as his belt is strong enough or he can grip the hook for long enough

Just don't get caught
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 September 2006 10:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap
This is not best practice, obviously. What if the person slips? What if the crane fails? However, if the operator and the idiot on the hook get caught out through injury or whatever, then they deserve all they get. But, who is the lift supervisor in all this? What are they doing? Is this a wind up or a bungy jump or something?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 September 2006 10:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smurfer
Use a man-basket suspended from the hook?
Admin  
#6 Posted : 06 September 2006 11:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeepster
You need to check the ACOP (Approved Code of Practice) on LOLER (Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regs 1998)

Firstly man riding operations are specific and require an appropriate basket with several safety and security features and secondly the crane must be suitable for man riding activities. This will refer to the number and types of brakes on the winches etc.

I am confident that you will pick up a prohibition notice if you are seen riding on the crane hook.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 06 September 2006 11:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Salus
is the driver competent, have they had induction, ensure all inspections, examinations and tests have been completed for the crane and do both have cscs cards
Admin  
#8 Posted : 06 September 2006 11:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ddraigice
Surely it'd be OK if it were only used for short duration.....?

OK, I'm being facetious. A man riding basket would be fine but there's better kit out there. Use a MEWP.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 06 September 2006 12:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Mitchell
We all need to take a step back here. Can you give full details of exactly what is involved? How can we be sure that the person NEEDS to be in the work position described? What is he doing etc? Cheers Ian M
Admin  
#10 Posted : 06 September 2006 12:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Chris

Take a leaf out of your own book, or tree perhaps, and stop trying to wind people up. You of all people know the real answer to this one.

Bob
Admin  
#11 Posted : 06 September 2006 13:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap
Its down to risk assesment
Admin  
#12 Posted : 06 September 2006 14:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Mitchell
Hi. If this is another wind-up thread it's getting a bit tiresome and is an unwelcome new development to the forum. Some are clearly wind-ups but such as this one spoils the good faith of fellow users.
Regards Ian
Admin  
#13 Posted : 06 September 2006 18:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By p winter
Agree with last posting - this must be a wind up
Admin  
#14 Posted : 06 September 2006 20:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JayJay
I had to look at the calender to make sure it wasnt April 1st !

JJ
Admin  
#15 Posted : 07 September 2006 18:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Cooper-Abbs
In no way was this a wind up post, it was a simple question looking for any potential guidance or best practice literature to answer the question posed.

In order to comply with the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations (LOLER), the British Standards Institution provides the code of practice BS7121.
This code of practice introduces the title of 'Appointed Person' - the competent person responsible for developing a safe system of work for every lifting operation.

As i am not an appointed person nor is this an operation that i am vastly experienced with, i had been asked the question by a colleague and in an effort to justify or support my response, rather than just give a simple no - i thought i would ask potentially more experienced or qualified persons.

For those who provide positive response thankyou.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 07 September 2006 20:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jas
Section 2(2) HASAWA

(B) arrangements for ensuring, so far as is reasonably practicable, safety and absence of risks to health in connection with the use, handling, storage and transport of articles and substances;

In my opinion we are articles

ps
What you building the empire state

i think your mate has looked at to many old pictures

Jas
Admin  
#17 Posted : 07 September 2006 22:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Cooper-Abbs
Jas,

Thank you for your post, the operation being undertaken is not a build, more a dismantle to be exact of a tree. The question was asked due to the fact that the crane is being used to lift trunk sections over the top of a house. The beech tree due for removal is in a very unstable state, the climber feels the tree is unsafe to climb and as an arborist would not be able to achieve a sound anchor point within the tree for his rope systems. The financial constraints of the job will not allow both a crane and MEWP to be bought onto site which of course would be ideal: the climber utilises the MEWP to choke the chains etc and then can make the felling cuts at ground level whilst the crane lifts the section away, in essence removing the tree in one. It was therefore asked if the climber could ride the hook of the crane to choke the chains into position higher within the canopy of the tree and then return to ground level to make the felling cut. In this instance the climber is in no danger of anchor point failure or tree failure whilst working aloft.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 07 September 2006 22:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Fitzpatrick
I cannot believe anyone is taking the initial question on this thread seriously.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 08 September 2006 17:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie
Taking on face value your assertion that this is not a wind up your use of the term "ride the hook" may be what is causing a concern.

This is work at height and the hierarchy of control would take you down the route

Can you do the work on the ground - NO
Can you provide a fully protected platform ???
If platform not reasonably practicable can you provide means of personal suspension - Possibly (Small man basket/ Boatswains chair/ troll harness)

Special requirements on crane in relation to man baskets and I have never known boatswains chairs or troll harness' used with a crane, but might be worth investigating.

Can the man put his foot in the hook and hold the hoist rope (mental image from your original posting) - NO

Hope this helps
Admin  
#20 Posted : 08 September 2006 22:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick TM Patience
I don't believe this is a work at height issue but rather a Lifting Operation issue and PUWER issue. The crane should be rated and examined for the lifting of persons (6 monthly examinations)AND the device for lifting the person should be designed for lifting a person e.g. a man-riding basket or similar i.e. NOT a hook. A personal suspension harness is used in the event of a fall and suspension for more than a few minutes can result in fatal trauma.
In the past demolition workers carrying out "topman working" would sometimes ride the demolition ball to get to their place of work. This type of practice would I believe be prohibited by an HSE Inspector and statements may be taken....
Admin  
#21 Posted : 09 September 2006 07:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Terry Jones
It is perfectly acceptable to utilise a crane for 2 purposes i.e. personnel lifting and load/cargo lifting, so long as the right equipment is used in both instances.
A bosun's chair is acceptable if used with a full safety harness/fall arrester. There are certain circumstances where the use of a secondary auxiliary line can be utilised to lift a person to sling the load, most cranes nowadays have 2 winches which enable this.
A crane will always out perform a M.E.W.P for access and reach anyway thus eliminating the use of 2 machines. To add a comment, yes agreed that there is special criteria to be met for personnel lifting but my point is that it is possible to lift a person safely with a crane, given the right circumstances and equipment.
Admin  
#22 Posted : 13 September 2006 12:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Antony McManus
All, we don't need to delve into legislation, Regs, ACoPs, guidance to know that this suggested 'procedure' is wrong.

Common sense will tell you that......


Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.