Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 26 September 2006 12:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Booney Good Afternoon All, We will shortly be moving our production facility from a ground floor unit to a new building where production will be over two floors - heavier work on the ground floor (for obvious reasons) and lighter duties on the first floor. This is going to give us an issue with regards to the emergency evacuation of one employee who has impaired mobility (mainly due to sciatica and arthritis). There is a lift located at one end of the building and fire escape routes at both ends for which the maximum distance to travel is approx. 40 metres. The employee can’t run but they can walk, albeit rather slowly. Also, said employee cannot be located on the ground floor as the nature of the work has previously been identified as too heavy. In the event of a fire, obviously the lift should not be used but then what practical measures can be put in place to ensure the employee can be evacuated safely? Do I put a procedure in place with the use of an evacuation chair (or similar)? I cannot do a suitable & sufficient RA as the building has not been handed over to us yet but I am trying to get a head start and any advice/experience would be much appreciated!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 26 September 2006 12:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever We will shortly be moving our production facility from a ground floor unit to a new building where production will be over two floors - heavier work on the ground floor (for obvious reasons) and lighter duties on the first floor. This is going to give us an issue with regards to the emergency evacuation of one employee who has impaired mobility (mainly due to sciatica and arthritis). There is a lift located at one end of the building and fire escape routes at both ends for which the maximum distance to travel is approx. 40 metres. The employee can’t run but they can walk, albeit rather slowly. Also, said employee cannot be located on the ground floor as the nature of the work has previously been identified as too heavy. In the event of a fire, obviously the lift should not be used but then what practical measures can be put in place to ensure the employee can be evacuated safely? Do I put a procedure in place with the use of an evacuation chair (or similar)? I cannot do a suitable &sufficient RA as the building has not been handed over to us yet but I am trying to get a head start and any advice/experience would be much appreciated! The issue of evacuating disabled persons is always a difficult one in that the solutions are not always easy. The fact that you are thinking about it now before you have moved is excellent. I think the first thing you must do is sit down with the employee and discuss it with him/her. You only have one floor to bring them down so this makes life a bit easier. The use of an evac chair sounds like your best solution but then you have to have people trained to us them and they have to be available at the time of an evacuation. Time is always a critical factor in an evacuation. Try and find out what, if any, detection system is installed. A decent detection system will buy you a bit of time. If it is addressable then you may be able to use the information to determine which exit route to use i.e. the furthest one away from the incident. Is there lobby protection to the stairs? This also can help in buying time as it delays fire spread to the stairwell. Have you looked in BS5588 part 8? It is a useful document and may be helpful.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 26 September 2006 12:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever oops - forgot to delete the orginal message. Can't we have a system where you can see the mseesage you are replying to?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 26 September 2006 13:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Hi Booney, You seem to be suggesting your staff will run during evacuation? Can I suggest you note in your RA that some staff might be slow on stairs etc - this might be an idea for any RA as those normally athletic types might have twisted ankle or something. Then soon after you move in run a evac excercise (you ought to anyway)and see if this specific person does hinder the general evac. Maybe you could allocate him a buddy (plus reserves) ?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 26 September 2006 13:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve B Hi Booney, I have just completed a Fire RA for a working mans club. as you can imagine the public who use this building vary from 19 to 90 with different disabilities from walking aids, wheel chairs, impaired visibility and hearing.... anyway to the point, the staff and management within this building are responsible for the safe evacuation of all members. If your employee can walk then something as simple as a buddy buddy system would be adequate to ensure safe evacuation. points to note for the buddy would be: 1. allow able bodied people to escape first. 2. be prepared to move at the pace of the disabled person stairways should be refuge fit i.e. a place of safety for a short period, therefore the urgency is to get the person to the stair. If as you say the indivual can walk then this should not be a problem. the introduction of escape chairs would (I believe) introduce other hazards as previously stated, of course the buddies would obviously need fire marshall training... hope this helps I also did a google search "evacuating disabled persons in an emergency" there is plenty to look at that may suit your case. Regards Steve
Admin  
#6 Posted : 26 September 2006 13:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By andymak If the lift is in a protected shaft such as running with a set of esacpe stairs, and has a secondary power supply to provide resillience. The lift can be used to evacuate mobility impaired personnel as long as suitable means are ensured of them not leaving the lift into a fire, and if the lift should fail personnel are on hand to wind the lift to a safe position. Evac chairs are also a good solution training is required but most also have instructions on them just in case they have to be used by non-trained personnel. Electric evacuation chairs are also available but are slow in descent, they also require the trained person to refresh themselves with teh operation every couple of months. Perhaps a refuge area could be created so the individual can wait until the main bulk of people have passed and then they can make their own way out with a 'buddy' there to assist if mobility is such that it is needed, this option takes the pressure off the individual as they do not feel that they are hindering others during the evacuation.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 26 September 2006 13:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Booney Shaun, thanks for the info, I don't know the full extent of the facilities as yet but I do know there will be a decent, addressable detection system in place so I take your comments on board. I will also have a look at BS5588 Jim, so far our employees have never ran in an evacuation but they have always been drills - in an actual fire, who knows? We will be doing an evac ASAP after moving in and I thank you for your suggestions
Admin  
#8 Posted : 26 September 2006 15:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Booney, I would run a trial evacuation first of all, and take the time from when the last "able bodied" person exits to your RVP, and the time when your physically impaired employee arrives at your RVP. I would hazard a guess that at least one or two of your other employees suffer from age related back problems (happens to a lot of us im afraid!) Evac chairs can be more trouble than their worth, and if your impaired employee walks from his car in the carpark to his place of work unaided every morning, i would say you dont have an issue. Please dont get me wrong, im not trying say that your employee in question isnt in pain some of the time and worthy of our extra consideration; but sometimes R.A's can go to the nth degree. Its also my philosiphy that we should send our guys home to their families in the same if not better condition than they left them at the breakfast table that morning. but sometimes common sense must prevail. Phil
Admin  
#9 Posted : 26 September 2006 16:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John_Webster Remember that the stairs will have 1 hour fire protection. The only time that anyone might have to get out in a hurry would be something like a serious and iminent bomb threat. When you speak to your employee, find out if he could manage to descend the stairs - even if slowly or shuffling down on his bottom. It might still only take him a few minutes to get out which would still be OK. Depending on the design of the building, the top landing may already provide him with a safe place to wait whilst the more ambulant pass by.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 26 September 2006 17:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever John, what makes you think the stairs will have one hour fire protection?
Admin  
#11 Posted : 27 September 2006 07:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Booney Shaun, I cannot confirm yet that the stairs do have 1 hour protection but I believe that is the case - they are concrete/plasterboard construction with fire doors at all exits but I will confirm this ASAP Phil, thanks for the comments, this employee can walk slowly but I am unsure how they cope with stairs and I intend to speak to them about this. The real test will be when we do the trial evac(s) Thanks again to all for your responses
Admin  
#12 Posted : 27 September 2006 09:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever They may only be half hour rated. But you must remember that the ratings are based on test conditions. When elements of structure are undergoing test to gain a fire rating the best quality workmanship goes into setting up the parts that are being tested. Even then it is not uncommon for them to fail several tests before eventually passing. The workmanship that goes into erecting a building often does not reflect that which went into the set up of the test pieces. And if the building has been in use for some time there is likely to be some degradation. Also the intensity of a fire may be more severe or less severe than those in test conditions. This why the ratings are just that - ratings. It does not mean the element of structure will hold up for the specified rating period.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 27 September 2006 12:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek Housley Number of issues to consider:- Under the Regulatory Reform Fire Safety Order 2005, which comes into force on 1/10/2006, I would consider a disabled person on the 1st floor to be a "significant finding" of the fire risk assessment. A PEEP ( personal emergency evacuation plan ), needs to be completed. Refuges need to be identified, but it needs to be remembered they are only temporary holding areas, and it is the employers responsibility to ensure that the individual concerned is able to get out. (Further info on PEEP's can be found on this discussion site, along with the internet, the term GEEP is also used this stands for generic emergency evacuation plan). In reference to fire resistance of doors, its is probably more likely to be to a half hour fire resisting standard, unless the stair is lobbied.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.