Rank: Guest
|
Posted By oneill
Hi
Just wondering what would be the most effective way of communicating the Safety Statement to staff, obviously I want them to all to sign off to say they have read and understood it. Would a series of presentations be the best bet, put it up on the public drive??? Any other suggestions?? Roughly 80 people involved.
Thanking you in advance
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Manny
People may sign to say they have read and understand but (in my opinion) most of them won't and don't. If you want to get the message over do something original and let the Boss himself/herself get on the stage and show his commitment in front of his staff.
Manny
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Packham
My experience is that safety statements are rarely read, and if so, then not always understood. Moreover, a safety statement is just that. For it to be effective it needs to be put into the context of the workplace.
My solution would be a series of "toolbox talks" where the safety statement can be explained, using case studies, either from your own or similar workplaces, to illustrate what the various statements mean and why workers should take the statement on board and comply.
This also gives you the opportunity for them to ask questions. Making it interactive will allow you to judge how well the information is being understood and the effectiveness of the message.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By JEB
You could also add a short multi choice questionnaire at the end of the presentation and then go through the answers with them before they return to work.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
The most effective system of communication is the "cascade"
The MD presents HIS or HER safety statement and commitment to it to their immediate group of senior managers. Each of them then presents it and their personal commitment to their staffs. MD will be present during these presentations and emphasises their own commitment. This continues down the line as far as the first line supervisor, (in the presence of their direct boss), who present the statement to their teams as well as their own personal commitment to it.
This is ACTIVE communication as opposed to PASSIVE (distribution through the mails, posting on notice boards)
I had occasion only this morning to ask a group of managers what was posted on the wall directly behind them (Quality, H&S and Environment statements) None had a reply.
A few weeks after the cascading you can confirm understanding by a questionnaire.
The cascade has to be repeated at least once annually. Where the boss at any level changes they should take time to reaffirm thier commitment to the policy.
Should the MD change then the whole process starts over again.
I am auditing a site next week where the MD is on temp assignement (one of my ex-victims at his permanent site) He took the trouble to run the cascade. The new MD arrives in December and I intend to persuade him to do it for his own benefit.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
Do you really need to get them all to sign it - if they all get a copy and you have it on the notice board? Whilst this practice can be useful, in some workplaces you could get yourself into disputes and disciplinary procedures in trying to achieve compliance by the awkward and the suspicious.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By anon1234
Even though the safety statement shows the intent of the business it generally is too high level to actually influence the daya to day activities this is more to do with the specific process and procedures that are put in place - I would be looking for people to have more awareness of the key outputs from risk assessments and to know what the safe sytem of work is rather than the fact that the MD thinks health and safety is so important he is going to implement a health and safety manangement system. Obviously the supporting organisation adn arrangements has much more value than the statement itself as well
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
I'm sort of in disagreement with anon here. Safety must start at the top and penetrate though to the bottom. We all know of situations where the paperwork is magnificent (OHSAS 18000 etc) but the message is otherwise.
Without the visible and continuing commitment of senior management and subsequent follow-through nothing will change no matter how many procedures you have.
The cascading I mentioned in response to the original posting is the most effective way I know of for getting management to commit themselves to H&S, and to a "safety statement", in front of employees.
Then they have to walk-the-talk.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mint
Copies on display at prominent locations around the workplace.
Also staple a copy to everyone's payslip.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By anon1234
Merv,
I suspect we are not in total disagreement - as I too believe that the message needs to be clearly seen to be coming from the top both in terms of words and action - I guessed my post would get some reaction - what I was really trying to get at is that the main headline policy statement in itself will not, for example, stop those doing road work from digging up live electrical cables whereas clear safe systems of work and communication of the control measures required (i.e. output of the RA) are critical - obviously this all needs to be supported by senior management taking a real interest and attaching real importance to effective management of H&S
Again not sure this post clearly states what I mean but hopefully you get the idea of where I was trying to come from.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Packham
I think the point is that a health and safety policy statement is not intended to deal with individual workplace situations. It is a statement confirming the intent of the organisation to ensure that work shall be carried out in a manner that does not result in an unacceptable risk to anyone (whether directly employed or not) such that their well-being will be affected. (Remember here that the word "welfare" is contained in the 1974 Act). Thus it should be written in general terms and not attempt to be specific.
Individual issues have to be dealt with by risk assessment and risk management policies and practices.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Anon, may I call you An ?
I think all of the posters on this thread are in agreement. Safety must start at the top and be clearly and visibly demonstrated by senior management. We were only discussing methodology.
And I also agree with the respondant who said "keep it simple" I try to make a point of adapting the vocabulary to the reader. There is no point in talking like the "Financial Times" if you are being read by "Sun" readers
The "safety statement" is not the "safety policy" which is a legally required document. Usually written by lawyers.
What I get MDs and site managers to do is to write out in fifty words or so their OWN personal feelings (not just correct something produced by the H&S people) on the H&S of their employees. This is the document that is then "cascaded".
The H&S policy is much less important to the individual employee. Have you ever read one of them all the way through ? I have 50-page policies sitting in my files. I am sure that they are all as water tight as a duck's bum. And just as usefull if you are not actually the duck. Policies are often signed "The Management" and given away free with a double portion of (darn. Can't think of anything apt. Maybe what you put on mushrooms growing in the dark ? Yeah. That's apt.)
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SeanThompson
Just coming back to this thread, is it a requirement to get all staff to sign that they understand and acknowledge the policy.
or...
Can i place safety policy overview poster around the workplace and have the full policy on the shared drive for people to access should they wish to read it more in depth.
Many Thanks
Sean
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Glad this thread bounced back again. I've just received a pocket card which reduces a 3 page "company" doc and a 1 page "site" doc to
Side 1 : the company commits itself to : (6 statements)
Side 2: Employees rights : (3), Employees duties (3)
Nice new logo and slogan : Advance together to make Risk retreat ! (that came from head office, not me !)
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SeanThompson
Merv,
Would you say that is suitable then?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony Brunskill
Sean,
The requirement is to effectively communicate the safety policy to employees. Personally I can think of nothing more dreadful than listening to me harp on about the great safety policy I have just written.
The key is to recognise that this is not a one off task but a cultural foundation reinforced through management action and communication every day.
Getting someone to sign for it does not demonstrate effective communication. What about the 7% of the population that are unable to read? But will sign so they do not lose their jobs. Or those of ethnic origin for whom English is sometimes (at best) a second language? Those who are Dyslexic? Each raises its own issues regarding "effective communication".
I like Merv's cascade and with his permission I am going to steal his idea. I particularly like the "in fifty words" bit because it gets buy in, they will think its their idea and commit to the "contract".
Regards
Tony
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
To answer your first question, Sean: There is no legal requirement to get employees to sign for the statement - and many of us don't think it a good idea.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SeanThompson
Cheers Ken, i don't think its a good idea too that's why i wanted clarification. If people want to read it they can, i will advise everyone where it is available and place a policy poster overview around the site.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony Brunskill
Sean,
To be clear if you do that and its tested in law it will not stand up.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SeanThompson
Why not? theres no set way of doing it
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ian Blenkharn
Talk to your Payroll staff - everyone listens to what they say, and opens the envelope at the end of the month.
Ask payroll to distribute your paperwork with pay advice notes/pay packets etc. You get 100% coverage and your problem is half way sorted!
Now, how to get 'em to read what falls into there hands?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jeffery Watt
If I remember right oneil is based in the ROI and the safety statement in the free state is usually the full blatter, statement of intent, responsibilities and detailed arrangements of who does what it is not usually a 3 pager.
My like minded colleagues were discussing something similar today about getting staff to respond to a stress survey. In the process for an employee handbook to be printed I was quoted £3000 for a nice glossy booklet- then the epiphany occurred- I could get everyone in the company a USB flash drive for a £1000, stick it on it give it to them for Xmas, what a nice way to promote safety and save paper and mercury in all that glossy processing. Technophobe Dad's sitting around asking there kids to show them how to use it.
Barmy I know but it's only a suggestion (as my long suffering other half keeps telling me)
Kind regards
Mr Tennants
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Tony,
you have my full and "free" permission.
My main point is, I suppose, "walk the talk".
But first, management at all levels should do the "talk". Commit themselves personally in front of their employees. Then live it.
The three page document mentioned above was presented to "management" : down to first line level by site manager.
Site manager then produced his personal, condensed version which was eventually presented by 1st line to employees.
A couple of weeks later 1st line distributed the pocket cards to employees, with a reminder of management commitment to H&S
In addition to other, ongoing improvement and motivational programmes, the above exercise will be repeated in about 12 months time. Earlier if deemed necessary.
And who deems if it is necessary ? Me. In consultation with site management of course.
Now back to that really awful audit report. Two weeks and I still haven't got it right. Aaaaaargh.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony Brunskill
Sean,
Because the law says "Effective Communication". Your approach will be fine provided you can be assured that Everyone has read the policy, understands its intent and is capable of implementing it as far as it concerns them.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.