Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 28 September 2006 21:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason911
I am currently on a one man crusade to get the local highways dept of the council to come and survey the 30mph road where I live, as I believe that the amount of people disregarding it will result in an forseeable accident.

No joke on a friday and saturday night people will average 60mph, which is totally unacceptabe.

The highways dept have point blank refused to even come and look at the problem I have highlighted, or advise the police to set up a speed trap.

Their reason?

The total lack of KSI's (Killed or seriously injured)as yet that have occurred in the street, although traffic calming measures such as speed bumps exist in less eligable winding streets that a vehicle could not even reach 40mph, let alone 60mph!!! They have ignored my request as to an explanation for this.

I have also asked them to advise me how to proceed by petitioning local residants ect., but they have those to ignore this request as well..twice!

So if the risk is forseeable, how can they get away with waiting until someone dies before they have to do something. Is it really one H&S law for us as employers and another for them as a government body charged with public safety?

All help appreciated!

Jay
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 September 2006 22:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bramall
Jay

Acouple of points for thought.

Firstly I can sumpathise with your problem, as, I am sure the council do, however, there are a couple of points that need to be made.

The police are responsible for enforcement of speed limits. Why not contact them yourself and get your neighbours to do likewise. The council have decided that a 30mph is applicable, but they cannot enforce it, only the police.

KSI's are a standard measure for remedial action throughout the highways industry. Although it is unfortunate that someone has to be killed or seriously injured before anything is done, the same situation that you face probably occurs in many locations. In an ideal world, the finance would be available to carry out every piece of work that may be needed, but as you will be aware, all organisations have to justify their spending, and so, if your site compares favourably to several others in terms of accidents then the obvious priority is to carry out works at the worst locations first.

Yes petitions are relevant, however, I would say petition the police to enforce the thing instead of peitioning the council to re-prioritise their spending plans.

Yes there is an obvious hazard at this location, but based on the balance of risk and cost (with no KSI's) surely the cost vastly outweighs the risk whereas other sites are probably the reverse and really do need action.

Sorry it probably is not the answer you were looking for, but I did feel it was necassary to give my honest opinion.

Regards

DrB
Admin  
#3 Posted : 29 September 2006 00:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor
Have you contacted your local councillor(s)?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 29 September 2006 02:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jom
Jason.

This week in rural Victoria, Australia, we had a shocking head-on collision that took seven lives. It has raised the exact same issue you are concerned about.

Here's an extract from today's newspaper editorial:-

"The intersection has, it seems, been a cause of concern to local residents for decades. In 2000, VicRoads refused a council request to improve conditions at the intersection on the grounds it did not have a sufficiently high accident rate to qualify as a black spot. This curious reasoning — waiting for an accident to happen rather than an accident waiting to happen — has resulted in seven deaths. We assume the intersection has now earned its black spot."

The full editorial is here:-

http://www.theage.com.au...09/28/1159337281530.html

John.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 29 September 2006 16:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Mathews
I think we should all take a leaf out the highway safety book. No one killed = no need for control measures. Yep, that's the way to go, I'm sure the judge will agree with me.

Sorry, I didn't used to be cynical but I've been in this job for too many years not to be. It does seem to be that road safety and occupational health and safety work on different criteria in their risk assessments.

TFI Friday I say.

Time for a G&T

Richard
Admin  
#6 Posted : 29 September 2006 21:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Nicholls
Or if you are very serious!!! You could do what a local Engineer did. Constructed a box to look like a GATSO painted it yellow positioned it (On private property) just inside the speed limit.

Guess what it worked....no more speeding motorists.
For a while at least.
Its worth a try if every thing else fails.
Get support from your local press that should speed things along, no pun intended.

Did your council reply to you quickly or not. I have issues with ours who have up to a 10 day response time.

Best of luck Alan N

Guess what they haven't met that one either...
Admin  
#7 Posted : 01 October 2006 12:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steven bentham
Unfortunately, HASAWA cannot be used on Highways & Police if they do not fulfill their obligations on this matter.

It has already been stated that the Police have priority for enforcement on your road.

Personally, I have difficult with the Highways reaction that they have not had enough killed before they can justify looking at the problem.

As residents under Human Rights legislation you have a right to life, and you should perhaps target them under this legislation. As a Public Body they have certain duties to comply with this legislation. Usually the local press photographing mums & small kids with placards shames the Local Authorities into action, particular prior to local elections.



Admin  
#8 Posted : 01 October 2006 22:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle
If you want action on speeding, your best bet is to make a formal complaint to the local police authority who are responsible for policing the law in respect of motoring offences, not the local highways department. If you can present evidence to them too, such as video/witness statements or a petition signed by residents all the better.

If, following police intervention it can be proved that a danger exists, you will have ammunition to pass to your local authority councillors who sit on the Traffic/Transportation/Road safety Committees of your local authority with a view to getting a road safety survey completed and perhaps being able to get action taken to improve the problem.

If you do not go through the channels that are in place you will find it a lot harder to achieve your goals...

Hope this is of assistance...

Stuart
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.