Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Roger K. Bentley
As a secondary school governor, now that the fire authority no longer carry out risk assessments, I have been asked to advise on the signposting of fire evacuation routes. As I have experience of emergency planning in industry, I didn't expect any difficulty. However, I have encountered a new consideration, that although from some parts of the building there are two possible escape routes, there is an 'approved' route from each room, which avoids too many children using one staircase. The school only wants to indicate the approved routes with signs, whereas I would normally advocate signs to both (particularly as in the event of a fire one might not be useable). Has anyone met a similar situation before, and how has it been resolved?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By shaun mckeever
Roger
The fire authority never did carry out your fire risk assessments even before the changes in legislation. In fact the fire authority in GMC took a headteacher to court for failing to carry out an adequate fire risk assessment, although in her case I believe the local authority were found to be responsible.
With respect to your signage problems your fire risk assessment should identify the exit routes that are available for use in an emergency. Any route that is designated as an emergency exit route must be clearly and unambiguously signed. In some workplaces such as offices it is not always necessary to indicate routes that are in every day use because occupants are likely to be familiar with those routes, but if the building is likely to be used by persons who are unfamiliar wth the building then they must be considered and normal routes would have to be indicated. If your school is used by others e.g. social events in the evening then the signage must be for these people as well.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steven bentham
I have seen the approved routes system work well and it is a fair point that overloading staircases will probably lead to more problems.
Most kids will know the school like the back of their hands.
Approved routes will also help visitors or during evenings.
You may wish to check if they have emergency lighting on the approved routes and walk the route yourself to see if it is logical.
Then test it with a fire drill.
You may be also interested in fire prevention;
check fire doors actually work - check that bins are secure - think arsonist - check boilerhouse is not full of stored material - check science labs & CDT areas have reasonable housekeeping - check flammable liquids are minimised and securely stored.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
Not much good if the fire is on the approved route! You need to take Shaun's point and indicate all alternative exit routes and to have fire instruction notices by call-points. Occupants should normally leave by the nearest available safe exit route.
Schools usually didn't have fire certificates under the old scheme either and the Fire Precautions (Workplace) Regulations required fire risk assessment - so it should now be a matter of reviewing and updating your existing assessments in the light of the guidance associated with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.