Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 24 October 2006 11:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By NatashaL Hi I was wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction? I have been given the task on sourcing a smoking shelter for our workers as it is coming up for the winter months. Can anyone advise me as to what the specific requirements are for them? i.e. the enclosures etc? Thanks Natasha
Admin  
#2 Posted : 24 October 2006 11:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By andymak Any structure can be used as a smoking shelter as long as it has sufficient air flow through it. This is achieved by having no more than 50% of the wall and ceiling areas enclosed. Most supply companies have some kind of smoking shelter available that is designed to meet the forth coming legal requirements. Try this link to see what I mean http://www.seton.co.uk/s...100026-1%20200230-2.html Happy hunting!
Admin  
#3 Posted : 24 October 2006 12:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Catman Hi Natasha Link I used when advising management http://www.south-ayrshir...alth/smokingexample2.asp This is a Scottish example and I am not sure if the guidelines are identical. Cheers TW
Admin  
#4 Posted : 24 October 2006 15:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By NatashaL Hi Thanks for your advice, so is the following shelter suitable? http://www.seton.co.uk/s...200230-2%20308919-3.html Thanks Natasha
Admin  
#5 Posted : 24 October 2006 15:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Catman Hi Natasha At a glance probably not. At least 50% of the permiter should be open which in simple terms means you can have at most a roof, rear and one side (or two half sides). The gaps at the bottom etc may reduce the closed area though and it may comply but I dont have time or enough dimension details to work it out. I am happy to be corrected though if somebody has the time to work it out. Why not ask Seton? Cheers TW
Admin  
#6 Posted : 24 October 2006 15:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Future NEBOSH Question? Smoking is unhealthy. Assisting employees to participate by providing shelter facilities is therefore contrary to the HASAWA 1974. Please discuss.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 24 October 2006 16:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Catman Hi David That + the cost of installation + the wine drinkers use at night + the customers first perception of the business being a smoking shelter + the fact that the shelter required maintenance & cleaning = The management agreed with me that twould be better to become a no smoking site inside the fence, full stop. We then provided smoking cessation advice free of charge for the employees, during working hours. Well received by some, but there were teddies thrown from prams as well. I suspect lots of sites will come to the same conclusion when the time comes. I have no crystal ball as far as legislation goes, nor am I a smoking Nazi, just thought this was the responsible option. Cheers TW
Admin  
#8 Posted : 24 October 2006 16:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By andymak Yes I have checked in the past and these ones do meet the new legislation, it is due to the gaps at the top and bottom making up 50% of the panel. There are issues with having shelters that are highly visible, as there are with other approaches where parts of the exterior of the building becomes smoking areas. There are many office blocks now that do not provide smoking areas at all and insist on the no smoking beyond the perimiter policy, but all that seems to do is keep the road sweepers busy or it causes an accumulation by the front gate!
Admin  
#9 Posted : 24 October 2006 16:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48 Natasha, we never know what trails we start when we make a post on this forum. When I read your title, it immediately took me back to days of yore. In those days I worked on a petrochem refinery that had "smoking huts" at strategic points so we could get a puff between work activity. No ventilation, small heaters for the winter and a means of ignition as we were prohibited from carrying same for obvious reasons. Chairs or oher materisla or objects were banned due to fire hazards! The smoke billowed out as you opened the door and I used to get through about 80 ciggies a day even while doing 12 hour shifts. Ah happy days! cough cough. Thanks for triggering that memory. (25 years non smoker now!) However, the reason for posting was just to say that I had not looked at this subject in detail before and found the earlier link to the Scottish site very useful. I ignored all the wonderful mathematics showing how to calculate 50% of whatever and looked at the pictures in the gallery section. They are great and give a clear picture of how to comply, North of the Border anyway. Well worth a look. As to the question posed about providing them. My initial thoughts are that as the law in Scotland does not place any duty to provide, then it seems likely that the same will apply in England. Thus the decision will be on cultural grounds and not H&S. People work safely outside so no particularly new or unknown problems re risks from that aspect, just a matter of whether a company wants to provide a facility or not. You could put it into a category alongside a creche or a gym.(although I agree that is an interesting juxtaposition) If you provide it, you assess and manage the risks it presents. One method of which is not to do it. I think most will take that option unless they have especial image concerns or large numbers of staff or regular visitors who smoke. ( a hospital a&e dept?)
Admin  
#10 Posted : 24 October 2006 16:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Chalkley Just a question - We have a duty to the health, safety and welfare of the staff. Surely a shelter would look after the poor dears and reduce the risk of a chest infection (which they are prone to) in the cold and wet weather? Hmmm... Thoughts? Richard.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 24 October 2006 17:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Chest infections in smokers - surely not!
Admin  
#12 Posted : 24 October 2006 17:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Aidan Toner Yes I am 'fascist control police' on this subject and cannot fathom any form of duty an employer might have to provide this facility------- But forgetting all about my small bias, Surely it is reckless for an employer to commit to LONG TERM provision of a smoking shelter. Should an employer not CLEARLY STATE A DECLARED REMOVAL DATE for this shelter at time of first provision.(Declared date could be 18 months or death/hospitalisation of smoking employee -whichever came first.)Possibly fix this declaration to side of shelter?? Provide several decent smoking cessation programmes and I believe an honest effort has been made to protect both 'employment contracts' and 'smokers health'. TOP TIP -MAKE YOUR SHELTER EASILY DEMOUNTABLE!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 24 October 2006 18:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48 Hi Aidan, you raise a frightening aspect, I think it is getting a little off topic for me to take it further but want to do so. I have started a new thread and hope you will respond there.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 25 October 2006 10:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By SafeDavid Message for NatashaL. I've just posted something on the other thread "Liability for smokers?" which might interest you.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 25 October 2006 11:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Brunskill I first should declare I am a smoker. As a business owner we have initiated a policy of no smoking on site. However we are a small business and this is easy to implement and enforce. However in larger sites it is my experience that banning smoking drives the practice underground. In addition it results in careless disposal of smoking materials as burning cigarettes are disposed of as the "manager" approaches. This in turn gives rise to a serious fire risk. Provide your shelters and think in risk terms not moral terms.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.