Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 25 October 2006 18:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin Taylor All I have recently moved into the woodworking industry and have to deal with the explosion risk from wood dust. At a recent fire insurers visit I have been asked to arrange an ATEX audit for the extraction systems - by this they mean all aspects of the installation - spark detection and arrestment, flammable motors wtc. When researching on ATEX what I am finding seems to cover the equipment used within hazardous areas and not the management of the explosive atmosphere (zoning etc) which I believe is covered by DSEAR. I am missing something with respect to ATEX and is there a branch of the directive that covers the whole environment - how (if at all) does this differ from DSEAR? all advice will be useful Martin
Admin  
#2 Posted : 26 October 2006 07:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson Martin, You are current in your assumptions regarding ATEX & DSEAR. Regards Adrian
Admin  
#3 Posted : 26 October 2006 08:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The Expert I would always say yes to ATEX and no to DSEAR. It is very unfortunate that HGTM stopped production so that the KSJQ Framework capabilities of the modern TKAC are missing from most of the TELS.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 26 October 2006 09:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker I may be missing something but I thought that DSEAR covered the whole atmosphere and zoning requirements with schedule 3 of the regulations broadly covering selection of the tools to be used but in reference to the Equipment and Protective Systems Intended for Use in Potentially Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 1996 which gives the exact requirements. But then again maybe not. Andy W
Admin  
#5 Posted : 26 October 2006 10:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Brunskill Andy you are right. You should establish zoning using the DSEAR requirments. ATEX then determines which items are suitasble for use in each zone. Regards Tony
Admin  
#6 Posted : 26 October 2006 10:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smurfer I hate acronyms. The Expert - would you care to expand because that went totally over my head!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 26 October 2006 11:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By andymak Hear hear! Due to the acronyms, I too understood very little of the above postings. I do wish people would use plain English, or explain the acronyms, to enable those that may be short on knowledge in certain areas to gain a better understanding, and therefore become better informed safety people. :-)
Admin  
#8 Posted : 26 October 2006 11:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris. R. Is there any wonder that we so called H&S professionals get a bad name when we use so much 'Jargon'. Lets go mad now and again and use plain English. You never know it may help in go old Joe Public understanding that we are about 'preserving life' and not 'restricting it' as the 'conkers bonkers' brigade would have them think.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Vernon Kay There is nothing incorrect about the reply by The Expert. He probably ought to have explained the accronyms though.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker Sorry ATEX is the European ATEX 137 directive taken from the French ATmosphere EXplosible DSEAR is the Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 Hope this helps Andy W
Admin  
#11 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Blunt Which leaves us wondering what HGTM, KSJQ, TKAC and TELS mean (if anything) in this context. Do tell (provided their translation does not breach the Acceptable use Guidelines, of course) Jane
Admin  
#12 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By andymak Can anyone help decipher this bit though? "It is very unfortunate that HGTM stopped production so that the KSJQ Framework capabilities of the modern TKAC are missing from most of the TELS" Would be greatly appreciated!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker Lost me Andy W
Admin  
#14 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Vernon Kay Perhaps HGTM = highly geeklike text message!
Admin  
#15 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Brunskill DSEAR - Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regualtions 2002 ATEX - ATEX is the name commonly given to the framework for controlling explosive atmospheres and the standards of equipment and protective systems used in them. It is based on the requirements of European Directives. Directive 99/92/EC (also known as ‘ATEX 137’ or the 'ATEX Workplace Directive’) on minimum requirements for improving the health and safety protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres. Just a point guys, We addressed the question in the forum not the need for individuals professional development. Would you criticise if I used COSHH, PUWER or LOLER. Jargon is a necessary shorthand for Safety Professionals particularly amongst themselves. If you are unsure simply ask, don't get on your high horse and start writing to the Plain English Society.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Brunskill I think you will find the expert does not have a clue what they stand for either. Example of TDAI leading TBAU through AWOT. Don't Ask
Admin  
#17 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Catman Fair point Tony, but seriously can anybody clear up the rest of the acronyms in the Experts post? I am completely baffled and a bit concerned that i have missed something in my education.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker A Quick Google found these HGTM hierarchical Generative Topographic Mapping TELS Technology Enhanced Learning in Science as for TKAC who knows But what these have got to do with the original question The Expert alone knows. Andy W
Admin  
#19 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smurfer I know what DSEAR and ATEX are - it was the rest I was querying, and was worried I may have missed something (as I do get involved in DSEAR assessments from time to time)
Admin  
#20 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker May I suggest a severe case of 'tugging of the lower limb' syndrome Andy W
Admin  
#21 Posted : 26 October 2006 12:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Vernon Kay I think he is pulling a fast one!
Admin  
#22 Posted : 26 October 2006 13:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker That's funny Vernon you agreed with him earlier in the thread. Are you one and the same?
Admin  
#23 Posted : 26 October 2006 13:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Vernon Kay I agreed he was correct in the first part, but the last set of accronyms totally blew me away!
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.