Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 16 November 2006 11:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert Paterson Hi Quick question that needs a speedy reply if possible. Is it a legal requirement to have onsite Occupational Health Personnel or is it okay to have access to an Occupational Health nurse or service? Question been asked and I am struggling to find legislation for this. If anyone has any thoughts on it I would be grateful for any guidance. Regards Robert Paterson
Admin  
#2 Posted : 16 November 2006 11:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze Reg 6 of the Management Regs refers to "...health surveillance as is appropriate..." but then leaves the details to the company risk assessment. This makes sense as an office will have different requirements to say a paint spraying plant. Hope this helps.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 16 November 2006 11:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze The need for risk assessment falls under reg 3 of the above. So while there is no "Thou shalt provide...", the chain of responsibility is broadly laid down and the details of how to comply are left to the company.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 16 November 2006 17:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham If you have chemicals on site, then: 1) Where it is appropriate for the protection of the health of his employees who are, or are liable to be, exposed to a substance hazardous to health, the employer shall ensure that such employees are under suitable health surveillance. 2) Health surveillance shall be treated as being appropriate where- (a) the employee is exposed to one of the substances specified in Column 1 of Schedule 6 ...... (b) the exposure of an employee to a substance hazardous to health is such that- (i) an identifiable disease or adverse health effect may be related to the exposure, (ii) there is a reasonable likelihood that the disease or effect may occur under the particular conditions of his work, and (iii) there are valide techniques for detecting indications of the disease or effect, and the technique of investigation is of low risk to the employee COSHH Regulation 12 Take a look also at MS24, Medical aspects of occupational skin disease, which also sets out where skin health surveillance is required. If you consider these, then there will be few workplaces where health surveillance would not be something to at least seriously consider. How you do this is another story!!! Chris
Admin  
#5 Posted : 16 November 2006 17:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze Good point Chris. Or taken from another angle the DSE regs state that "users" should be provided with an eye test, for occ health purposes etc, etc... In practice this tends to be contracted out to an external optician, although some larger organisations may have qualified opticians on the payroll.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.