Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alison WR I'm reviewing our consultation and governance arrangements, including the director responsible for safety.
'common sense' says the responsible director should be in the same management line as the principal H&S adviser. But, there is also value in having a more independent director.
Can anyone share their experiences of having a responsible director who is outside the management line of the senior H&S adviser.
Regards
Alison
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ian G Hutchings Alison
I have worked with some very successful organisations where the director responsible for safety has been an executive director with operational responsibility. I sometimes think that the default to HR or business support is an easy option.
It can work well either way depending on whether the board see it as something that can be totally or partially delegated.
It is a funny term because the CEO/MD still holds full accountability.
Happy to help with further suggestions if you drop me an email.
All the best
Ian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brian John Abbs Many years ago, my friend joined an organisation reporting on safety to the MD. Health and safety in the organisation in general, and specifically on construction work. The organisation had a fairly good record, and was looking to achieve a 0AFR like many forward thinking companies do. As the organisation changed and people were shuffled about my friend ended up reporting to the Ops manager...... On the Ops managers own operations.
There probably aren't too many health and safety people out there that don't know what happened next.
As much as my friend tried to lead, encourage, and foster a sense of moral responsibility in the Ops manager, health and safety was merely something to talk about to gain brownie points or a set of figures to fiddled in order to achieve his bonus at the end of the year.
-Practical and practicable advice was ignored. -When several office staff became pregnant, my friend produced the relevant risk assessment only to be told "it isn't an issue". -An attempt was made not to report RIDDOR accident because "I don't believe it was an accident". -When my friend asked a member of staff to stop bring unauthorised COSHH material onto site, he told them to carry on doing it as long as my friend didn't see them doing it. -My friend was asked to use creative techniques to demonstrate a decreasing AFR when the opposite was true. -My friend raised the inadequacy of the induction on several times, to be told "You're not listening...leave it" 6no months later when he got a rebuke from the Group Safety Director over said inadequacies, Ops manager gave my friend a balling out in front of the entire office for not dealing with it. -The Ops manager -although probably not deliberately- made access to the tools of the trade (software, tools, general kit, vehicles, mobile phone, PPE) very difficult.
These are just a few of the incidents that occurred while the Ops manager claimed to be “Safety focussed”.
I’m not sure my friend will be there much longer as he’s taken to CCing the MD in on every email he sends to the Ops manager.
Having heard these stories, I have had my belief that Safety Advisors/Safety Managers should report to the MD/Chief Exec/COO in the organisation, and not the people responsible on a day to day basis. The top man is ultimately responsible for safety, yet he should be distant enough from day to day operations to see things with some objectivity. That is not true of Construction managers on the career trail.
There’s my tuppence worth.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brian John Abbs Alison Sorry, I posted without completing the summary. My post demonstrates in 1no organisation what can happen when Safety Advisor working in an independent role, has their independence removed. I too have had similar experiences, and this is why I am convinced that Safety Advisors (looking at compliance at least, it would also be helpful in design improvement as well as other areas) should remain independent of the people they are reporting on.
Bash
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By garyh I see it differently; the Safety Manager is part of the Management team - you have to be to get co operation.
In every role I have had (in very big and very small organisations) the Safety Manager eventually reports to someone responsible for production (& lots of other things).
I have also been a Manager in charge of the whole Dept (Safety, Ops, Financial, Commercial, Training, HR). You have to MANAGE things, and make defensible cost/benefit based decisions.
This concept of being pulled in 2 (or more)directions is the essence of what management is about.
If you end up in a situation where you are being ignored / undermined/ bypassed I would recommend:-
1) Put things in writing, then move on.(Make your report sharp and focussed). Don't argue endlessly. You can only do your best and life is too short.
2) Leave
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Gareth W Jones I am fortunate I report to the works manager and have had the full backing from him in all safety related issues, I think there are a lot of Health and Safety professionals who believe Health and Safety must come first!! I believe safety and production must work alongside each other, it is not relevant who the person is you report to as long as you have the full backing from all of the employees, communication,is a brilliant tool!!
Gareth
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alison WR Thanks to all who responded.
My situation is that I have strong management support and want to develop it. My preferred outcome keeps two directors [operations and audit] strongly involved [we have comparatively complex governance arrangements] - I'll see if it floats.
Many thanks
Alison
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Bramall One item you might want to make the Directors aware of is that one of your roles is to keep both the company and the directors out of hot water and possible jail time by ensuring that the organisation meets current legislation.
As a director myself it is the big stick which I sometimes haev to use on other directors but be careful that you do not use it too often otherwise it will gradually loose it's power.
regards
Chris bramall
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.