Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 08 December 2006 16:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Taylor I am about to embark on a survey of which FL is the healthiest in the work place ie Diesel v Gas v Electric I know there are some obvious benefits but has anyone done this or know of a good resource site
Admin  
#2 Posted : 08 December 2006 17:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JEB I think I have something at home on this I will check and come back to you next week John
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 December 2006 11:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Scott Fisher John, If you are using it internally then you only really have one option, electric. If however you are using it outside then you need to way up the benefits i.e pollution, noise, cost of fuel and maintenance. We recently selected a gas vehicle over diesel as we agreed it was more enviromentally friendly and the running costs were less.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 12 December 2006 16:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JEB Modern LPG and diesel trucks can be used in adequately ventilated factories. John
Admin  
#5 Posted : 12 December 2006 19:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd Adequate ventilation is an emotive subject. One person can happily work alongside a diesel truck indoors, while another will feel ill in seconds. Diesel trucks should only be used indoors for short periods, in WELL ventilated buildings, and if fitted with particulate exhaust filters. LPG trucks are not much better. Never forgetting that the exhaust from diesel engines contains some of the most potent carcinogens known to man. The exhaust from an LPG fuelled liftruck contains a smaller AMOUNT of particulates BUT they are also smaller particles, so get inhaled deeper into the lungs http://www.themanufactur...lshandling/article3.html
Admin  
#6 Posted : 13 December 2006 19:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese Hi JEB That statement goes against the grain and experience, do you have any follow up I could research? We assess FLT activities and I haven't seen anything that supports using them in enclosed places. Thanks
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.