Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 December 2006 09:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Andrew A colleague of mine who is a designer is trying to establish the statutory requirements (if any) for finger protection to door hinges, in particular within schools. Regards
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 December 2006 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel irrespective of statutory nor other official guidance standards; the major player in design is risk assessment i.e. the designer makes a decision then sells that decision to a client time and again I come across designers who use any arguement i.e. building standards etc to justify as against risk assessment and making desisions thereafter any designer who does not specify finger guards [via a sensible arguement/RA] in a junior school and similar undertaking is risking their neck irrespective it is the designers duty to undertake a suitable and sufficient risk assessment as well as supply a design
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 December 2006 18:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor There is no statutory requirement for these. Some schools use them. Some 'self-adhesive' type fall off. Some are pulled off by children. The screw-on type seem more robust but only protect one side of the door - unless someone has invented a better one. If you're getting incidents of trapped children's fingers, there would appear to be a good case for them at 'infant/primary' level.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 December 2006 14:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin J Morley Is there a foreseeable risk? A quick search of the web would suggest that there is! This is the guidance issued by one council to its schools: "Analysis of previous accidents shows that while all doors in schools are potentially a risk, classroom doors, toilet entrance doors and toilet cubicle doors represent the highest risk of finger trapping accidents. Past injuries have included amputations and severed fingers as well as fractured or broken fingers and crushed or bruised fingers or finger tips. Accidents have mainly involved nursery or Key Stage 1 pupils. Due to the severity of these injuries and the availability and cost of finger guarding devices, it is a requirement that guards are fitted in the first instance to classroom doors, entrances to toilets and toilet cubicle doors used by nursery or Key Stage 1 pupils. In addition an assessment should be made of the risks of entrapment from other doors. Particular attention should be paid to the following: - . Doors which pupils congregate next to · Doors which pupils queue beside for lunch or other reasons · Doors near entrances · Doors which are susceptible to strong winds · Doors which have created problems in the past (check accident records) · Heavy doors (with or without dampening mechanisms) · Areas where pupils are unsupervised" I'm sure that similar risk assessments have guided the fitting of these devices in many public facilities and commercial premises designed to attract children! martin
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.