Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stephen Dear All,
Have any of you any statistics or papers on the benefits of a reverse car parking policy at company premises?
Best regards,
Stephen
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman No stats, but a number of companies have adopted the practice of reverse parking.
Thinking is that, while it may take a bit of practice, reversing in to a parking space is, eventually, easier and quicker than trying to "drive" in. The "trolley" action of the front wheels does actually make it easier to drive past the parking space and then reverse in. Try it. Front parking may take you three goes. Reverse parking and you can do it in one.
And driving out when you have reversed parked is much safer as you have better visibility.
The only times I don't reverse-park is when we are doing the weekly shop and need to load £100 quids worth into the boot.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Packham Many chemical plants, oil refineries and oil terminals will insist on reverse parking for all vehicles on site.
The reason is that should there be an incident, then it is far quicker to evacuate vehicles if they have been reversed parked. Also there is far less of a probability of accidents than should everyone start to reverse out of parking spaces at the same time.
My experience is that on some sites you are also required to leave keys in the ignition and car unlocked. Obviously, this is only practicable when the site is "closed", i.e. not accessible to those who might wish to steal vehicles.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stupendous Man Reverse parking also has some (admittedly limited) environmental benefits. It is better to drive out of a parking space smoothly without having to engage reverse then first gear.
Certainly agree with other comments, better visibility etc. I also find it easier to judge the width of my vehicle by using mirrors while reversing.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Bannister No hard evidence, other than common sense: when arriving for work there is little incentive to rush, so reversing onto the space may be achieved quite easily. At shift-end, the rush to get away will probably be much safer for pedestrians in the car park if drivers are not reversing.
However, if the parking areas are adjacent to open windows then the exhaust fumes result in complaints from anyone inside.
As for the supermarket run, my wife always searches for a "drive-in drive-out" space, nevermind the long treck back with an overloaded trolley with its own particular steering peculiarities in the pouring rain. Mostly the space behind is then occupied so that I have to struggle to fill the car boot from a trolley at the front of the car, or leave a long crease down the adjacent car - sorry, it wasn't me you must have done that somewhere else, isn't it terrible that someone could do that and not own up!
Conclusion: retire and use t'internet to shop.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ali Turf In certain Army Regiments, it is an offence to forward park, the thinking harking back to Orson Cart days, when they could get out quicker if facing the right way. Agree totally on ease of parking and getaway after shift.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 Stephen, have you tried ROSPA or other providers of defensive driving training. I well remember being taught to use reverse parking wherever possible. It is the safer option with less risk to you, the adjacent vehicles and any passing pedestrians. At least that was the teaching at that time. Cannot remember the details but something like easier and quicker to get out of the parking space with less risk of collision in any circumstances including emergencies, the big movements are in the lower risk areas, backing into a defined space is better than reversing out into a less defined space etc etc. All I can say it does work, especially with longer and larger vehicles, like 4x4, the Merc or the Jag when trying to fit into supermarket spaces.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stephen Dear All,
Thank you for your responses. I do confess to not really seeing a true reduction in overall risk. There may be lower driving risks, but the personnal injury risk can go up if you have to try and get stuff out of your boot when someone has parked so close you need a can opener or there are curbs to trip on etc. results in much twisting and lifting. Having said that when reversing out in a pubic car park this w/e one person thought it would be good to watch me start moving, then walk behind the car, thankfully I had spotted/anticipated what they were going to do.....Happy Days
Regards,
Stephen
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Dickson No stats, but it does keep the boss happy!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Grace Stephen, Guess you are aware of the "view" (don't think there are any stats to support it) that it is safer - from perspective of personal safety - to reverse in and drive out. Less faffing about etc.
Let me tell you a (personal) story: Many years ago I went out between Christmas and New Year to visit a nearby town. I parked at the roadside, echelon style nose to kerb. I came back to the car after shopping to find lots of condensation. I ran engine, even had both front windows down with wife and I looking out sideways. As I slowly reversed out I felt a bump... I had knocked down an elderly man who was slowly (and I think it was very slowly) walking diagonally across the road. I was mortified.... Looking back there are many things I should have done: - not moved until all windows were clear - had wife get out of car and "back me out" - parked rear to kerb
And there may be others. But I know which I think is the easiest - park rear first/inwards. The only time I do not do so is when visiting supermarkets (as others have said) but it still makes me me uncomfortable, makes me recall my mistake. PS Gentleman was OK
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tabs Reverse parking calls on your spacial awareness and familiarity after a period of driving (so reasoning suggests you might be more comfortable with both as opposed to at the beginning of a driving session).
Getting things in/out of boot is safer done out of the path of passing vehicles. If large loads are involved, consider pulling up in a loading/unloading position rather than a parked position. For short periods, better places are often available for such.
However - if your parking bays are as unfriendly as my local train station's parking tightly, nearside door to nearside door is needed and that means top n' toeing.
Be prepared to provide training ;-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mike As well as the obvious large object or wall - reverse park sensors will detect pedestrians, kerbs, shrubs etc. I wouldn't be without mine now.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GSP The Porsche's and other luxury sports/super cars in my works car park would have real bother with any reversing policy due to lack of viewing space out of tiny rear windows HAHA
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor I wonder whether one is more likely to hit a pedestrian if reversing up to a footway - as there will probably be more of them there than in the carriageway.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark R. Devlin Hi Stephen,
Its should be termed "parking for forward exit" as opposed to reverse parking.
The number of times I have seen people reversing into a space that they could have driven straight into and then been able to drive straight out of......
Another one of these safety mantras that are often done for the sake of...
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.